California OAH special education order · January 8, 2013
Order Granting District's Peremptory Challenge
OAH Case No. 2012110503 · ALJ Bob Varma
OAH granted District's timely peremptory challenge to ALJ Rebecca Freie and reassigned the case to ALJ Troy K. Taira.
This case went to decision
Student v. Clovis Unified School District: Clovis Unified's blended special day class and general education middle school placement upheld; all of Student's claims denied. (2013)
Summary
On January 7, 2013, District filed a peremptory challenge to the assigned ALJ, Rebecca Freie. Each party may disqualify one assigned ALJ without stating a reason. The challenge must be made before the hearing starts, and before the prehearing conference if an ALJ is already assigned by then. OAH found District's challenge timely, granted it, and reassigned the matter to ALJ Troy K. Taira.
Why it matters
Each side gets one no-reason challenge to the assigned ALJ, but it must be filed before the prehearing conference or hearing begins, so parents should decide early whether to use it.
Key authority cited
- Gov. Code, § 11425.40, subd. (d)
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1034
People named in the order
- Rebecca Freie, Administrative Law Judge (challenged)
- Troy K. Taira, Administrative Law Judge (reassigned)
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH CASE NO. 2012110503
v. ORDER GRANTING DISTRICT’S
PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE
CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
On January 7, 2013, the Clovis Unified School District (District) filed a notice of peremptory challenge to Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Rebecca Freie in the above captioned matter. District’s peremptory challenge is made pursuant to Government Code section 11425.40, subdivision (d), of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), and California Code of Regulations, title 1, section 1034.
Government Code section 11425.40, subdivision (d), establishes the criteria for disqualification of the presiding officer. A party is entitled to one peremptory challenge (disqualification without cause) to an ALJ assigned to an Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) hearing. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1034, subds. (a) & (b); Gov. Code, § 11425.40, subd. (d).) In no event will a peremptory challenge be allowed if it is made after the hearing has commenced. In addition, if at the time of a scheduled prehearing conference, an ALJ has been assigned to the Hearing, any challenge to the assigned ALJ shall be made no later than commencement of that prehearing conference. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1034, subd. (c).) A peremptory challenge is not allowed on reconsideration or remand, and cannot be made after a hearing has begun. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1034, subd. (a).)
District’s peremptory challenge is timely made and is granted pursuant to Government section 11425.40, subdivisions (a) and (d), and California Code of Regulations, title 1, section 1034, subdivision (c). The matter is reassigned to ALJ Troy K. Taira.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 8, 2013 /s/
BOB VARMA
Presiding Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
