California OAH special education order · October 7, 2013
Order Following Prehearing Conference
OAH Case No. 2013060620 · ALJ Judith L. Pasewark
OAH dismissed Student's Section 504, ADA, and civil rights claim as beyond due process jurisdiction and set three IDEA issues for an October 2013 hearing against Newport-Mesa Unified.
This case went to decision
Student v. Newport-Mesa Unified School District: Newport-Mesa Unified violated Child Find for a senior with a brain injury; must fund $2,600 in tutoring and two assessments. (2014)
Summary
After a telephonic prehearing conference, the ALJ set the hearing to begin October 15, 2013, at the District's offices. The issues set for hearing are child find and identifying Student's needs through the IEP process, procedural violations of the IDEA, and denial of FAPE from December 2011 through the June 17, 2013 filing date. The ALJ dismissed Student's fourth issue, whether the denial of FAPE also violated her rights under Section 504, the ADA, and civil rights law, because it is outside the jurisdiction of a special education due process hearing. The order also sets rules for exhibits, witnesses, telephonic testimony, late motions, and settlement notice, and closes the hearing to the public at Parent's request.
Why it matters
OAH due process hearings decide only IDEA and related special education claims, so Section 504, ADA, and civil rights claims must be brought in another forum. The order is also a reminder that undisclosed witnesses or exhibits, and motions filed after the prehearing conference, can be excluded unless good cause is shown in a sworn declaration.
Key authority cited
- Ed. Code § 56505, subd. (e)(7)
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g)
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH CASE NO. 2013060620
v. ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING
CONFERENCE
NEWPORT-MESA UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT.
On October 7, 2013, a telephonic prehearing conference (PHC) was held before Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Judith L. Pasewark, Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Tania L. Whiteleather, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Parent on behalf of Student (Student). S. Daniel Harbottle, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of the Newport-Mesa Unified School District (District). The PHC was not recorded.
Based on discussion of the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:
1. Hearing Dates, Times, and Location. The hearing shall take place on October
15, and 16, 2013, and shall continue thereafter on dates determined by the ALJ. 1 The hearing shall take place at the District’s offices located at 220 23rd Street, Building D, Costa Mesa, CA 92627.. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 a.m. the first day of the hearing and at 9:30 a.m. all other days unless otherwise ordered. The parties are ordered to meet and confer to select additional hearing dates which accommodate counsel and witnesses. In the event, the parties have not agreed upon additional dates, the ALJ shall select dates as needed.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify.
A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.
2. Issues and Proposed Resolutions. The issues at the due process hearing are
listed below.
a) Whether the District failed in its child find duty and failed to identify and address Student’s unique educational needs through the IEP process;
The parties have a calendar conflict on October 17, 2013.
b) Whether the District failed to comply with basic procedural requirements of IDEA and whether those requirements denied Student a FAPE; and c) Whether the District failed to offer Student a FAPE during the period from December 2011 through the date of filing this complaint (June 17, 2013). 2
3. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring exhibit
binders prior to the hearing. The parties shall use numbers to identify exhibits, but shall place the letter “S” or “D” in front of the exhibit to designate if it is a Student or District exhibit (for example, “S-5, S-6, or D-1, D-2”). Each exhibit shall be internally paginated by exhibit, or all of a party’s exhibits shall be Bates-stamped. Each exhibit binder shall contain a detailed table of contents. The parties represent that they have served their evidence binders on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7).
At the hearing, each party shall supply an exhibit binder containing its exhibits for use by the ALJ, and a second exhibit binder for use by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH prior to the hearing. In the event of duplicate exhibits, the most legible version will be used.
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not included in the exhibit lists and not previously exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless it is supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
4. Witnesses. Each party is responsible for procuring the attendance at hearing
of its own witnesses. Each party shall make witnesses under its control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not disclosed in the party’s prehearing conference statement except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
The parties are ordered to meet and confer by October 11, 2013, to determine the schedule of witnesses. The parties shall coordinate the availability and order of testimony of witnesses to ensure that there is a witness available to testify at all times during the hearing, and to ensure that the hearing is completed as scheduled.
The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness lists prior to the hearing, bearing in mind that evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear. The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony.
Student’s 4th issue of whether the District’s denial of FAPE for Student resulted in denials of her rights under Section 504, ADA and civil rights law, is beyond the jurisdiction of this due process hearing, and is therefore dismissed.
5. Scope of Witness Examination. After the first direct and cross-examinations,
each party shall be limited in examining the witness to only those matters raised in the immediately preceding examination.
6. Telephonic Testimony. Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a
matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall move in advance for leave to do so, unless the opposing party has stipulated that the witness may appear by telephone. The proponent of the witness shall provide the proposed witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties, containing all of each party’s exhibits, prior to the hearing; and shall ensure that the hearing room has sound equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all these requirements have been fulfilled.
7. Motions. No pretrial motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion filed
after this date shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause as to why the motion was not made prior to or during the prehearing conference of October 7, 2013.
8. Stipulations. Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are
encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in written form.
9. Conduct of Counsel and Hearing Room Decorum. Counsel, all parties, and all
witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times.
Cellular phones, pagers, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless permission to the contrary is obtained from the
ALJ.
10. Compensatory Education/Reimbursement. Any party seeking reimbursement
of expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of expenditures, as part of its case in chief. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.
11. Special Needs and Accommodations. At present neither party anticipates the
need for special accommodation for any witness or party, or for translation services.
12. Hearing Closed To the Public. At the request of the parent, the hearing will be
closed to the public.
13. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue working together
to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.
IF A FULL AND FINAL WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS REACHED
AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A
VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035. THE
PARTIES SHOULD ALSO LEAVE CONTACT INFORMATION SUCH AS CELLULAR
PHONE NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY. THE
PARTIES SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY FAX THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE
SIGNED AGREEMENT OR A LETTER WITHDRAWING THE CASE TO THE OAH AT
THE FAXINATION LINE at 916-376-6319.
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.
14. Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of evidence or
other sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 07, 2013 /s/
JUDITH PASEWARK
Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
