California OAH special education order · October 4, 2013

Order Following Pre-Hearing Conference

OAH Case No. 2013071241 · ALJ June R. Lehrman

OAH excluded District witnesses from the hearing except while testifying, but allowed District a designated representative and denied Student's requests to tape record and to require a non-testifying designee.

Granted in part Evidence and witnesses

This case went to decision

Student v. Los Angeles Unified School District: Los Angeles Unified prevails: claims about missed OT and no 2013 IEP meeting were barred by a settlement agreement's FAPE waiver. (2013)

Summary

At the prehearing conference, Student asked to tape record the conference and hearing, to exclude District witnesses except when testifying, and to require District's designated representative to be someone not expected to testify. The ALJ denied the recording request and granted witness exclusion. District may still keep one designated representative in the room for the whole hearing, and that person need not be a non-witness. The ALJ also dismissed Student's breach of contract claim as outside OAH jurisdiction and set two FAPE issues, about occupational therapy and a missed annual IEP meeting, for hearing October 14 to 17, 2013.

Why it matters

Parents can ask OAH to keep witnesses out of the hearing room until they testify, but the district may still keep a designated representative present even if that person will testify. Breach of contract claims belong in another forum, not OAH.

Key authority cited

  • Ed. Code § 56505, subd. (e)(7)

Topics

prehearing conference witness exclusion designated representative breach of contract jurisdiction occupational therapy annual iep

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In the Matter of:

PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH CASE NO. 2013071241

v. ORDER FOLLOWING PRE-HEARING

CONFERENCE

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT.

On October 4, 2013, a telephonic prehearing conference (PHC) was held before Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) June Lehrman, Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Vanessa Jarvis, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Student. Patrick Balucan, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of District. The PHC was recorded.

1. Hearing Dates, Times, and Location.

The hearing shall take place on October 14, 15 16 and 17, 2013, at the OAH offices located at 15350 Sherman Way, Ste. 300, Van Nuys CA 91406. The hearing shall begin at 1:30 p.m. the first day of the hearing and at 9:30 a.m. all other days, unless otherwise ordered. The hearing will continue thereafter, Monday through Thursday, as needed at the discretion of the ALJ, until completed.

The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify.

A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.

2. Issues and Proposed Resolutions. 1 The issues at the due process hearing are

listed below.

1) Did District deny Student a free appropriate public education (FAPE) during the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 school years by failing to provide appropriate occupational therapy? 2) Did District deny Student a FAPE during the 2012-2013 school year by failing to convene an annual individualized educational program (IEP) team meeting for Student? Student’s issue number 3, for “breach of contract,” is dismissed as outside OAH jurisdiction.

3. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring exhibit

binders prior to the hearing. The parties shall use numbers to identify exhibits, but shall place the letter “S” or “D” in front of the exhibit to designate if it is a Student or District exhibit (for example, “S-5, S-6, or D-1, D-2”). Each exhibit shall be internally paginated by exhibit, or all of a party’s exhibits shall be Bates-stamped. Each exhibit binder shall contain a detailed table of contents. The parties shall serve their evidence binders on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). At the hearing, each party shall supply an exhibit binder containing its exhibits for use by the ALJ, and a second exhibit binder for use by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH prior to the hearing. In the event of duplicate exhibits, the most legible version will be used.

Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not included in the exhibit lists and not previously exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless it is supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and the ALJ rules that it is admissible.

4. Witnesses. Each party is responsible for procuring the attendance at hearing

of its own witnesses. Each party shall make witnesses under its control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not disclosed in the party’s prehearing conference statement except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.

The parties are ordered to meet and confer by October 10, 2013, as to the schedule of witnesses, to coordinate the availability and order of testimony of witnesses, to ensure that there is a witness available to testify at all times during the hearing, and to ensure that the hearing is completed as scheduled.

The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness lists prior to the hearing, bearing in mind that evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear.

5. Scope of Witness Examination. After the first direct and cross-examinations,

each party shall be limited in examining the witness to only those matters raised in the immediately preceding examination.

6. Telephonic Testimony. None anticipated.

7. Timely Disclosure of Witnesses/Exhibits. Education Code section 56505,

subdivision (e)(7), provides for disclosure of witnesses and exhibits at least five business days prior to the hearing.

8. Order of Presentation of Evidence. The order of presentation of evidence shall

be as follows: Student’s evidence followed by District’s, however witnesses to be called by both sides will be questioned on all issues whenever first called to the stand.

9. Motions. Student’s motion to tape record the PHC and the hearing is denied.

Student’s motion to exclude District witnesses from the hearing except when testifying is granted, except that District may designate a designated representative who may attend the hearing in its entirety. Student’s motion to require District to designate as its designee a person who is not expected to testify is denied.

At present no other prehearing motions are pending or contemplated.

10. Stipulations. Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are

encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in written form.

11. Conduct of Counsel and Hearing Room Decorum. Counsel, all parties, and all

witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times.

Cellular phones, pagers, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless permission to the contrary is obtained from the

ALJ.

12. Compensatory Education/Reimbursement. Any party seeking reimbursement

of expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of expenditures, as part of its case in chief. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.

13. Special Needs and Accommodations.

At present neither party anticipates the need for special accommodation for any witness or party, or for translation services.

14. Hearing Closed To the Public.

15. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue working together

to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.

IF A FULL AND FINAL WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS REACHED

AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A

VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035. THE

PARTIES SHOULD ALSO LEAVE CONTACT INFORMATION SUCH AS CELLULAR

PHONE NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY. THE

PARTIES SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY FAX THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE

SIGNED AGREEMENT OR A LETTER WITHDRAWING THE CASE TO THE OAH AT

THE FAXINATION LINE at 916-376-6319.

Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.

16. Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of evidence or

other sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 04, 2013 /s/

JUNE R. LEHRMAN

Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings