California OAH special education order · November 19, 2014

Order Following Prehearing Conference; Granting Motion to Continue; Resetting Hearing Dates

OAH Case No. 2014070308, 2014080441 · ALJ Paul H. Kamoroff

OAH denied Student's requests for two doctors to testify by telephone because both live in the county where the hearing is held and Student showed no good cause. OAH also granted Student's continuance.

Summary

At the prehearing conference in these consolidated cases, OAH granted Student's motion to continue and reset the hearing to December 8, 2014, at District offices. It denied Student's motions to let Dr. Naser Elbalalesy and Dr. Ying Peng testify by telephone, because both live in the county where the hearing is held and Student gave no good cause. The ALJ also dismissed Student's Section 504 claim on his own initiative because OAH lacks jurisdiction over it. The order lists the issues for hearing and requires a Spanish interpreter.

Why it matters

A party who wants a witness to testify by phone must show good cause, and local witnesses will usually be expected to appear in person. Section 504 claims cannot be heard at OAH, so families should not rely on OAH to resolve them.

Key authority cited

  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g)
  • Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49
  • Ed. Code, § 56505, subd. (e)(7)

People named in the order

  • Dr. Naser Elbalalesy, Student's proposed witness
  • Dr. Ying Peng, Student's proposed witness
  • Maureen Graves, Student's attorney
  • Lauri A. Arrowsmith, District's attorney

Topics

telephonic testimony continuance section 504 consolidated cases prehearing conference interpreter

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In the Consolidated Matters of:

PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH Case No. 2014070308 v.

TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,

TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, OAH Case No. 2014080441 v. ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING

CONFERENCE; GRANTING MOTION

PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT. TO CONTINUE; RESETTING HEARING

DATES

On November 17, 2014, a telephonic prehearing conference was held before Administrative Law Judge Paul H. Kamoroff, Office of Administrative Hearings.

Maureen Graves, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Parent on behalf of Student. Lauri A. Arrowsmith, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of the Tustin Unified School District.

The PHC was recorded.

Based on discussion of the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:

1. Hearing Dates, Times, and Location. The hearing is continued on motion of

Student and shall take place on December 8, 9, 10, and 11, and continuing day to day, Monday through Thursday as needed at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin each day at 9:00 a.m., with the exception of the first day of hearing, on which day the hearing shall begin at 1:00 p.m., unless otherwise ordered.

The hearing shall take place at District’s offices located at 15400 Lansdowne Rd., Room 604, Tustin, CA 92782.

District shall ensure that the hearing room is configured into a courtroom setting and shall have at a minimum 1) a table for Parents and their representatives; 2) a table for District’s legal representative and special education representative; 3) a table for the witness;

and 4) a table for the ALJ, near an electrical outlet. District shall provide drinking water and tissue to all parties, witnesses and the ALJ. The same hearing room shall be used for each day of hearing and shall be available at least one hour prior to the commencement of the hearing each day. The hearing room shall be locked following the hearing each night.

District shall ensure that the hearing room and access to it are in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify.

A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.

2. Issues. The issues at the due process hearing are listed below.

Student’s Issues:

Whether District denied Student a free appropriate public education from April 2013 to the present, due to the following: 1 a) Failing to provide an adequate educational assessment:

b) Failing to offer appropriate speech and language goals;

c) Failing to offer appropriate speech and language services;

d) Failing to offer appropriate behavior intervention services;

e) Failing to offer parent training;

f) Failing to provide direct home and community based behavioral supports;

g) Failing to address Student’s daily living deficits;

h) Failing to employ research based therapies in Student’s educational placement;

i) Failing to meet Student’s social needs;

j) Failing to meet Student’s fine motor needs;

k) Failing to offer the least restrictive environment;

l) Failing to offer an appropriate placement; and The undersigned ALJ dismissed Student’s claim that District violated his rights under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, sua sponte, because OAH lacks jurisdiction for this claim.

m) Failing to offer extended school year service for the 2013 summer.

District’s Issues:

Whether District appropriately assessed Student pursuant to the following assessments:

a) Student’s initial assessment in April 2013; and b) Student’s psychological assessment on Spring 2014, as amended on May 30, 2014.

3. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring exhibit

binders prior to the hearing. The parties shall use numbers to identify exhibits, but shall place the letter “S” or “D” in front of the exhibit to designate if it is a Student or District exhibit (for example, “S-5, S-6,” or “D-1, D-2”). Each exhibit shall be internally paginated by exhibit, or all of a party’s exhibits shall be Bates-stamped. Each exhibit binder shall contain a detailed table of contents. The parties shall serve their evidence binders on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). At the hearing, each party shall supply an exhibit binder containing its exhibits for use by the ALJ, and a second exhibit binder for use by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH prior to the hearing. In the event of duplicate exhibits, the most legible version will be used.

Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not included in the exhibit lists and not previously exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless it is supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and the ALJ rules that it is admissible.

4. Witnesses. Each party is responsible for procuring the attendance at hearing

of its own witnesses. Each party shall make witnesses under its control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not disclosed in the party’s prehearing conference statement except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.

The parties are ordered to meet and confer by close of business on December 4, 2014, as to the schedule of witnesses. The parties shall coordinate the availability and order of testimony of witnesses to ensure that there is a witness available to testify at all times during the hearing, and to ensure that the hearing is completed as scheduled.

The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness lists prior to the hearing, bearing in mind that evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear.

The parties shall attempt to reach agreement on a witness list for the first day of hearing. District shall have witnesses available in case agreement on a witness list is not reached. The parties shall be prepared at the end of each day of hearing to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the time the testimony of each such witness is expected to take. The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony.

5. Scope of Witness Examination. After the first direct and cross-examinations,

each party shall be limited in examining the witness to only those matters raised in the immediately preceding examination.

6. Telephonic Testimony. Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a

matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall move in advance for leave to do so, unless the opposing party has stipulated that the witness may appear by telephone. The proponent of the witness shall provide the proposed witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties, containing all of each party’s exhibits, prior to the hearing; and shall ensure that the hearing room has sound equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all these requirements have been fulfilled.

Student’s motions to allow Dr. Naser Elbalalesy and Dr. Ying Peng to testify telephonically are denied. Each witness resides within the county where the hearing is being convened, and Student failed to cite good cause why these witnesses should be permitted to appear telephonically.

7. Order of Presentation of Evidence. In an administrative proceeding, the

burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005)

546 U.S. 49, 56-62 [126 S.Ct. 528, 163 L.Ed.2d 387].) Here, the matter is consolidated.

Accordingly, Student shall present his case-in-chief for his issues, followed by District for its issues. If a witness is to be called by more than one party, each party shall ask questions of the witness so that the witness does not need to return for testimony.

8. Motions. No pretrial motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion filed

after this date shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause as to why the motion was not made prior to or during the prehearing conference of November 17, 2014.

9. Stipulations. Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are

encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in written form.

10. Conduct of Counsel and Hearing Room Decorum. Counsel, all parties, and all

witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times.

Cellular phones, pagers, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless permission to the contrary is obtained from the

ALJ.

11. Compensatory Education/Reimbursement. Any party seeking reimbursement

of expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of expenditures, as part of its case in chief. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.

12. Special Needs and Accommodations. A Spanish language interpreter is

required.

13. Hearing Open To the Public. At the request of the parent, the hearing will be

open to the public.

14. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue working together

to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.

IF A FULL AND FINAL WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS REACHED

AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A

VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035. THE

PARTIES SHOULD ALSO LEAVE CONTACT INFORMATION SUCH AS CELLULAR

PHONE NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY. THE

PARTIES SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY FAX THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE

SIGNED AGREEMENT OR A LETTER WITHDRAWING THE CASE TO THE OAH AT

THE FAXINATION LINE at 916-376-6319.

Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.

15. Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of evidence or

other sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: November 19, 2014

/ S/

PAUL H. KAMOROFF

Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings