California OAH special education order · December 12, 2014
Order Following Expedited Prehearing Conference
OAH Case No. 2014100290 · ALJ Adrienne L. Krikorian
OAH denied Student's oral motion to move the expedited hearing to January 6, 2015, finding no good cause, and kept the hearing on December 17–19, 2014, limited to discipline claims against Panama.
This case went to decision
Student v. Panama-Buena Vista Union School District: Panama-Buena Vista Union must fund 35 hours of counseling and tutoring for a seven-week child find failure; other claims denied. (2015)
Summary
At an expedited prehearing conference, Student asked to continue the expedited hearing to January 6, 2015. Student argued that date was the 20th school day after the amended complaint was filed. The ALJ denied the request for lack of good cause and set the hearing for December 17–19, 2014. The order framed three issues against Panama: whether Panama had a basis of knowledge of Student's disability, whether it followed discipline protections before changing his placement on November 14, 2014, and whether his conduct was a manifestation of his disability. It also let Student's expert testify by phone, with conditions, and noted that Bakersfield is not a party to the expedited claims.
Why it matters
Expedited discipline hearings move fast and OAH will not easily push them back, so families should be ready to try the case within days. Students who were not yet found eligible can still claim IDEA discipline protections if the district had a 'basis of knowledge' of a disability.
Key authority cited
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(k)
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(k)(5)
- Ed. Code § 56505, subd. (e)(7)
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g)
People named in the order
- Dr. Delaina Martinez, Student's expert witness
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH Case No. 2014100290 v. ORDER FOLLOWING EXPEDITED
PREHEARING CONFERENCE
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND
BAKERSFIELD CITY SCHOOL
DISTRICT.
On December 12, 2014, Administrative Law Judge Adrienne L. Krikorian, Office of Administrative Hearings held a telephonic expedited prehearing conference. Attorney Nicole Hodge Amey appeared on Student’s behalf. Attorney Stacy Inman appeared on behalf of Panama-Buena Vista Unified School District (Panama). Attorney Jennifer Rowe Gonzalez appeared on behalf of Bakersfield City School District (Bakersfield). The PHC was recorded. Based on discussion of the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:
1. Expedited Hearing Dates, Times, and Location. Student’s oral motion to
continue the expedited hearing to January 6, 2015, which she contended is the 20th school day from the filing of the amended due process complaint, was denied for lack of good cause.
The expedited hearing shall take place on December 17, 18, and 19, 2014, and continuing day to day, Monday through Thursday as needed at the discretion of the ALJ.
The hearing shall begin on December 17, 2014 at 9:30 a.m., and on all other days at 9:00 a.m. unless otherwise ordered.
The hearing shall take place at Panama’s offices located at 3100 Actis Street, Bakersfield, California 93309. Panama shall provide a facility for the hearing that fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794 ), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), and all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify.
A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.
2. Issues for Expedited Hearing. The issues at the expedited due process hearing
are:
a) Is Student entitled to the protections of title 20 United States Code section 1415(k) for suspensions from school from August 18, 2014 until the filing of the amended complaint because Panama had a basis of knowledge under section 1415(k)(5)(b) that Student was a child with a disability entitling him to the protections of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? b) If Panama had a basis of knowledge that Student was a child with a disability entitling him to the protections of title 20 United States Code section 1415(k), did Panama fail to comply with section 1415(k) before changing his placement on November 14, 2014? c) Was Student’s behavior on November 14, 2014, caused by, or did it have a direct and substantial relationship to, his disability? Ms. Amey acknowledged on the record that the expedited issues and related remedies are limited to the 2014-2015 school year, and the remedies sought are limited only to Panama. Bakersfield is not a party to the claims at the expedited hearing, but may attend and question witnesses if it chooses to do so.
3. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring exhibit
binders prior to the hearing. The parties shall use numbers to identify exhibits, but shall place the letter “S” in front of Student’s exhibits, and P in front of Panama’s exhibits (for example, “S-5, S-6, or D-1, D-2”). Each exhibit shall be internally paginated by exhibit, or all of a party’s exhibits shall be Bates-stamped. Each exhibit binder shall contain a detailed table of contents, including the exhibit number, date and title of the document. All documents with separate dates must be separately identified as an exhibit, unless they are part of one chain of documents, such as responsive emails.
The parties shall serve their evidence binders on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). At the hearing, each party shall supply an exhibit binder containing its exhibits, as described above, for use by the ALJ, and a second exhibit binder for use by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH prior to the hearing. In the event of duplicate exhibits, the most legible version will be used.
The parties shall meet and confer at 8:00 a.m. on Monday, December 15, 2014, to discuss the scope of exhibits in light of the narrow issues in this expedited matter, to delete duplicate exhibits from the exhibit binders and to consolidate exhibits where possible.
The parties shall exchange resumes or curriculum vitae for each witness who is expected to testify as to their professional credentials. Notwithstanding the requirements of Education Code section 56505, subd. (e)(7), the parties shall exchange resumes not later than 24 hours before the witness is scheduled to testify.
Panama shall provide an authenticated copy of the 2014-2015 school calendar as one of its exhibits.
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not included in the exhibit lists and not previously exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless it is supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
4. Witnesses. Each party is responsible for procuring the attendance at hearing
of its own witnesses. Each party shall make witnesses under its control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not disclosed in the party’s prehearing conference statement except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
The parties have agreed and are ordered to meet and confer on December 15, 2014 at 8 a.m. as to the scope and schedule of witnesses. On the first day of hearing, the parties shall provide the ALJ with a detailed schedule which shall include an estimate of time for each side’s direct and cross examination. The schedule shall include the time contemplated for telephonic witnesses, as listed discussed below.
Each witness will only be called once to testify, except for rebuttal purposes, and both parties shall examine the witness on all issues when the witness is first called. Panama shall have witnesses available in case agreement on a witness list is not reached. The parties shall be prepared at the end of each day of hearing to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the time the testimony of each such witness is expected to take.
The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness lists prior to the hearing, bearing in mind that evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear.
Prior to the commencement of the due process hearing, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for cross-examination of each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses, and the ALJ will finalize the witness schedule. The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony.
5. Scope of Witness Examination. After the first direct and cross-examinations,
each party shall be limited in examining the witness to only those matters raised in the immediately preceding examination.
6. Telephonic Testimony. Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a
matter within the discretion of the ALJ. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g). Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall move in advance for leave to do so, unless the opposing party has stipulated that the witness may appear by telephone. The proponent of the witness shall provide the proposed witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties, containing all of each party’s exhibits, prior to the hearing; and shall ensure that the hearing room has sound equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all these requirements have been fulfilled.
Student’s motion to allow his expert witness, Dr. Delaina Martinez, to testify telephonically is granted. Student shall provide Dr. Martinez with a complete exhibit binder from each party, containing all of each party’s exhibits, prior to the hearing, and shall ensure in cooperation with Panama that the hearing room has sound equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness. The witness shall testify from a landline phone and in a room that is private and she shall be the only person in the room during her testimony.
Telephonic testimony shall be limited in time to no more than 1 1/2 hours. The parties shall consider that time limitation when preparing their witness schedule.
7. Order of Presentation of Evidence. Student is the petitioning party and shall
present his case first, subject to the provisions of paragraph 4 regarding witness scheduling.
8. Motions. No pretrial motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion filed
after this date shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause as to why the motion was not made prior to or during the PHC of December 12, 2014.
9. Stipulations. Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are
encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be signed by counsel for all parties and shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in written form.
10. Conduct of Counsel and Hearing Room Decorum. Counsel, all parties, and all
witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times.
Cellular phones, pagers, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless permission to the contrary is obtained from the ALJ. No one in the hearing room shall be permitted to engage in text messaging while the hearing is on the record.
11. Compensatory Education/Reimbursement. Any party seeking reimbursement
of expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of expenditures, as part of its case in chief. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.
12. Special Needs and Accommodations. A Spanish language interpreter is
required. A party or participant to this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in the hearing may contact the assigned calendar clerk at (916)
263-0880, the OAH ADA Coordinator at OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov or 916-263-0880 as soon as the need is made known. Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at http://www.dgs.ca.gov/oah/Home/Accommodations.aspx.
13. Closed To the Public. The hearing will be closed to the public.
14. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue working together
to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.
IF A FULL AND FINAL WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS REACHED
AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A
VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035. THE
PARTIES SHOULD ALSO LEAVE CONTACT INFORMATION SUCH AS CELLULAR
PHONE NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY. THE
PARTIES SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY FAX THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE
SIGNED AGREEMENT OR A LETTER WITHDRAWING THE CASE TO OAH AT THE
FAXINATION LINE at 916-376-6319.
If the parties contemplate that the matter may settle on the last business day before the start of the expedited hearing, they shall telephonically inform OAH staff of the status of settlement negotiations, and leave a message for the hearing ALJ on the settlement hotline, including phone numbers where counsel can be reached after hours.
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.
Because this is an expedited hearing, the hearing dates will not be vacated if a settlement is reached subject to board approval. Student must either withdraw the expedited claim, or proceed to hearing.
15. Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of evidence or
other sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: December 12, 2014
/ S/
ADRIENNE L. KRIKORIAN
Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
