California OAH special education order · December 5, 2014
Order Following Prehearing Conference
OAH Case No. 2014110335 · ALJ Joy Redmon
OAH dismissed Student's claims about the SARB process, anti-bullying policies, and discrimination because they do not arise under the IDEA, and set hearing on three placement and accommodation issues.
This case went to decision
Student v. Dixie Elementary School District: Dixie Elementary need not provide partial home instruction, shortened days, or requested accommodations; all three of Student's claims denied. (2015)
Summary
At a telephonic prehearing conference, the ALJ narrowed Student's complaint against Dixie to three issues for the 2014-2015 school year: a shortened-day placement with home instruction, hard copies of assignments, and a positive or neutral tone from adults. The ALJ determined that Student's other claims, about the Student Attendance Review Board process, Dixie's anti-bullying policies, and discrimination, do not arise under the IDEA. Those claims fall outside OAH's jurisdiction and were dismissed. The order also set hearing dates and rules for exhibits, witnesses, and courtroom procedure.
Why it matters
OAH can hear only claims tied to a student's identification, evaluation, placement, or FAPE under the IDEA. Families raising attendance board (SARB), bullying-policy, or discrimination complaints should frame them around how they denied FAPE, or pursue them in another forum.
Key authority cited
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(6)
- Ed. Code, § 56501, subd. (a)
- Wyner v. Manhattan Beach Unified Sch. Dist. (9th Cir. 2000) 223 F.3d 1026
- Ed. Code, § 56505, subd. (e)(7)
People named in the order
- Joy Redmon, Administrative Law Judge
- Alejandra Leon, Attorney for Dixie Elementary School District
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH Case No. 2014110335 v. ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING
CONFERENCE
DIXIE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT.
On December 5, 2014, a telephonic prehearing conference (PHC) was held before Administrative Law Judge Joy Redmon, Office of Administrative Hearings. Mother appeared on Student’s behalf. Attorney Alejandra Leon appeared on Dixie’s behalf. The PHC was recorded.
Based on discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following orders:
1. Hearing Dates, Times, and Location. The hearing shall take place at 380
Nova Albion Way, San Rafael, CA 94903. It is scheduled for December 16 and 17, 2014, and continuing day-to-day thereafter, Monday through Thursday, at the discretion of the ALJ.
On December 16, 2014, the hearing shall begin at 9:30 a.m. and end at 5:00 p.m., and shall begin at 9:00 a.m. and end at 5:00 p.m. on remaining days, unless otherwise ordered. Dixie shall ensure that the facility for the hearing fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), and all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.
The parties shall immediately provide hearing dates to proposed witnesses, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure their availability. Failing to properly notify or subpoena a witness does not constitute good cause for their unavailability.
2. Issues and Proposed Resolutions. The issues below were discussed at the PHC
and reworded for clarity:
Issue: Has Dixie denied Student a free appropriate public education during the 2014- 2015 school year by failing to offer and provide:
a. an appropriate placement that would include three shortened school days of no
more than six periods and two days of home instruction per week;
b. an accommodation requiring teachers to provide Student hard copies of
assignments rather than requiring him to obtain documents off School Link;
and
c. an accommodation requiring adults who interact with Student at school to
utilize a positive or neutral tone when speaking with him? Proposed Resolutions: Student’s IEP will be modified to include three shortened school days of no more than six periods and two days of home instruction per week; an accommodation for hard copies of written assignments, and the use of positive or neutral tone when school personnel speak with Student; and as compensatory education, five hours per week of a homeschool teacher until Student has caught up with missed work, and brought up grades to a passing level.
3. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring exhibit
binders prior to the hearing. The parties shall number exhibits in a way that clearly identifies the party offering the exhibit (for example “S-1” for Student or “D-1” for District). All pages of a party’s exhibit binder shall be consecutively numbered. Each exhibit will consist of one document or short series of documents that are related (for example, each IEP shall have its own exhibit rather than a single exhibit for all IEP’s). Each exhibit binder shall contain a detailed table of contents. Each party shall serve an exhibit binder containing its respective exhibits on the other party in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). At the hearing, each party shall supply an exhibit binder containing its exhibits for use by the ALJ, and a second exhibit binder for use by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH prior to the hearing. In the event of duplicate exhibits, the most legible version will be used.
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not included in the exhibit lists and not previously exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless it is supported by a written declaration under penalty of perjury, and the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
4. Witnesses.
a) Each party is responsible for procuring their own witnesses; however, the parties shall make witnesses under its control reasonably available to the other party.
Witnesses shall be scheduled in a way that avoids delays and minimizes or eliminates having to call a witness twice or out of order. Only witnesses disclosed in a party’s prehearing conference statement may testify, except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
b) The parties are ordered to meet and confer to develop a proposed joint witness schedule. The proposed schedule will be presented to the ALJ at the beginning of the hearing. Prior to commencing the hearing, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the proposed witness schedule and address scheduling issues for individual witnesses, before the schedule is finalized. The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses and the length of their testimony.
5. Scope of Witness Examination. After the first direct and cross-examinations,
each party shall only question the witness on matters raised in the immediately preceding examination. Parties shall be required to establish their cases in chief (conducting both direct and cross) so that each witness only appears once.
6. Telephonic Testimony. A party must ask in advance if it intends to present a
witness via telephone; if granted, the party shall provide the proposed witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties, prior to the hearing; and shall ensure that the hearing room has sound equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and the witness to hear objections and rulings. Neither party has requested telephonic testimony.
7. Electronic Recording of Hearing.
a. Audio Recording. At present, neither party intends to record the hearing. If a
request is made, the following conditions would apply to any recording: 1) that OAH’s recording is the only official recording; 2) that the recorder will be turned on and off at the same time as the ALJ’s recording, to avoid recording conversations while off the record; and 3) the operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay the hearing.
b. Video Recording. No party, witness or anyone else present may make any
video recording of any part of the proceedings. Any person doing so shall be subject to sanctions.
8. Motions. Student’s complaint raised several claims in addition to those
identified above in the issues section including objections to the Student Attendance Review Board (SARB) process, Dixie’s anti-bullying policies, and discrimination claims. Parents and public agencies have the right to present a complaint “with respect to any matter relating to the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the child, or the provision of a free appropriate public education to such child.” (20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(6); Ed. Code, § 56501, subd. (a).) OAH has jurisdiction to hear due process claims arising under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (Wyner v. Manhattan Beach Unified Sch. Dist.
(9th Cir. 2000) 223 F.3d 1026, 1028-1029 [hereafter Wyner].) It was determined that the allegations regarding the SARB process, anti-bullying policies, and discrimination claims do not arise under the IDEA and are outside of OAH’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, these claims were dismissed and will not be heard as part of this due process matter.
At this time, no other prehearing motions are pending or contemplated. Any other motion filed after this date shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause why the motion was not made prior to or during this prehearing conference.
9. Stipulations. Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are
encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in written form.
10. Compensatory Education and Reimbursement. Any party seeking
reimbursement of expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of expenditures, as part of its case in chief. Any party seeking compensatory education shall provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.
11. Conduct and Hearing Room Decorum. Counsel, all parties, and all witnesses
shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times. Cellular phones, pagers, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless permission to the contrary is obtained from the ALJ.
12. Special Needs and Accommodations. At present neither party anticipates the
need for any special accommodation for any witness or party. A party or participant to this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in the hearing may contact the assigned calendar clerk at (916) 263-0880, the OAH ADA Coordinator at OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov or 916-263-0880 as soon as the need is made known. Additional information concerning a requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at http://www.dgs.ca.gov/oah/Home/Accommodations.aspx.
13. Hearing Closed To the Public. The hearing will be closed to the public.
14. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue their attempts to reach an
agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. If a settlement is reached five days or fewer than five days before the due process hearing is scheduled to begin, the parties shall, in addition, immediately inform OAH of that fact by telephone at (916) 263-0880. IF A FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT IS
REACHED AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE BUSINESS DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE
PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE
SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035, AND SHALL ALSO LEAVE CELLULAR PHONE
NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY.
Dates for hearing will not be vacated until OAH receives a letter of withdrawal, or those portions of the signed agreement withdrawing the case, with signatures. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.
15. Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of evidence or
other sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: December 5, 2014
/ S/
JOY REDMON
Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
