California OAH special education order · May 18, 2015
Order Following Prehearing Conference
OAH Case No. 2015021006 · ALJ Laurie Gorsline
OAH set a June 2015 hearing on whether the Charter Schools violated their child find duties, and allowed three Charter Schools witnesses to testify by telephone.
This case went to decision
Student v. Aveson Charter Schools et al.: Aveson charter schools must give staff 40 hours of training after a flawed 2012 assessment and IEP meeting; other claims denied. (2015)
Summary
After a telephonic prehearing conference, the ALJ framed one issue for hearing: whether the Charter Schools denied Student a free appropriate public education between February 19, 2013 and December 2014 by failing to meet their child find obligations. Student seeks Lindamood Bell programs as compensatory education or, as an alternative, reimbursement for tutoring. The ALJ granted the Charter Schools' request for three witnesses to testify by telephone. Because Student was ready to stipulate that Aveson Charter Schools is the correct respondent and the Charter Schools were not ready to address it, the ALJ ordered the parties to meet and confer and address the question on the first day of hearing.
Why it matters
Families seeking compensatory education or reimbursement must bring proof of costs and evidence of the type, amount, and duration of services they need. When a charter school's legal name is unclear, the correct respondent should be confirmed before hearing.
Key authority cited
- Ed. Code, § 56505, subd. (e)(7)
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g)
- 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
- 29 U.S.C. § 794
- Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.
People named in the order
- Francisca Mendoza, Charter Schools witness (telephonic)
- Craig Cotter, Charter Schools witness (telephonic)
- Casey Rasmussen, Charter Schools witness (telephonic)
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH Case No. 2015021006 v. ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING
CONFERENCE
AVESON SCHOOL OF LEADERS AND
AVESON GLOBAL LEADERSHIP
ACADEMY (CHARTER SCHOOLS).
On May 18, 2015, a telephonic prehearing conference was held before Administrative Law Judge Laurie Gorsline, Office of Administrative Hearings. Carolyn Olson, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Student. Michael Ohira, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Aveson School of Leaders and Aveson Global Leadership Academy (Charter Schools). The PHC was recorded.
Based on discussion of the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:
1. Hearing Dates, Times, and Location. The hearing shall take place on June 8,
9, 10, and 11, 2015, and will continue day to day, Monday through Thursday as needed at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin each day at 9:00 a.m. with the exception of June 8, 2015, on which day the hearing shall begin at 1:30 p.m., unless otherwise ordered.
The hearing shall take place at Aveson School of Leaders, 1919 East Pinecrest Drive, Altadena, California 91001. Charter Schools will ensure that parking is available for Student and his representatives and the ALJ. Charter Schools shall provide facilities that fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), and all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify.
A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.
2. Issues and Proposed Resolutions. The issue at the due process hearing is:
Did Charter Schools deny Student a free appropriate public education between February 19, 2013 and December 2014 when Student qualified for special education, by failing to comply with their child find obligations? Proposed Resolutions:
Student seeks the following:
(1) For Charter Schools to fund the program Seeing Stars and Visualization and Verbalization at Lindamood Bell in Pasadena for nine weeks, four hours per day, five days per week;
(2) For Charter Schools to fund the program Cloud-9 at Lindamood Bell in Pasadena for three weeks, four hours per day, five days per week; or (3) As an alternative to compensatory education, for Charter Schools to reimburse Parents for tutoring costs.
3. Respondents. In the caption of the complaint, Student named Aveson School
of Leaders and Aveson Global Leadership Academy, and in the body of the complaint, Student indicates that Aveson Charter Schools is the local educational agency responsible for Student which operates Aveson School of Leaders and Aveson Global Leadership Academy.
At the PHC, Student was prepared to stipulate that Aveson Charter Schools is the correct respondent. Charter Schools was not prepared to address this issue at the PHC. The parties shall meet and confer by May 28, 2015, and be prepared to address the matter on the first day of hearing.
4. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring exhibit binders
prior to the hearing. Except as permitted herein or otherwise ordered by the ALJ, the parties shall use numbers to identify exhibits, but shall place the letter “S” or “C” in front of the exhibit to designate if it is a Student or Charter Schools exhibit (for example, “S-5, S-6, or C- 1, C-2). Each exhibit shall be internally paginated by exhibit, or all of a party’s exhibits shall be Bates-stamped. Each exhibit binder shall contain a detailed table of contents.
Each exhibit shall consist of one document; separate documents may not be combined into one exhibit. Excerpts of an audio record of an individualized education program team meeting should be transcribed and offered as documentary evidence; that portion of the audio record transcribed shall be provided to the opposing party with the transcript to allow an opportunity to verify the accuracy of the transcription. Transcription need not be done by a certified court reporter.
The parties shall serve their evidence binders on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). At the hearing, each party shall supply an exhibit binder containing its exhibits for use by the ALJ, and a second exhibit binder for use by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH prior to the hearing.
In the event of duplicate exhibits, the most legible version will be used. The parties shall meet and confer by June 3, 2015 to delete duplicate exhibits from the exhibit binders.
The parties shall exchange resumes for each witness who is expected to testify as to their professional credentials. Notwithstanding the requirements of Education Code section 56505, subd. (e)(7), the parties shall exchange resumes and curriculum vitae not later than 24 hours before the witness is scheduled to testify.
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not included in the exhibit lists and not previously exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless it is supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
5. Witnesses. Each party is responsible for procuring the attendance at hearing
of its own witnesses. Each party shall make witnesses under its control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order.
The parties shall comply with Education Code section 56505 (e)(7). No party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
The parties shall meet and confer by June 3, 2015, as to the schedule of witnesses and coordinate the availability and order of witnesses to ensure that there is a witness available to testify at all times during the hearing and to ensure that the hearing is completed as scheduled.
On the first day of hearing before the first witness testifies, the parties shall provide the ALJ with one detailed hour-by-hour schedule of all witnesses expected to testify at hearing, which list shall also include an estimate of time for each party’s direct and cross- examination.
Each witness will only be called once to testify, except for rebuttal purposes, and all parties shall examine the witness when the witness is first called. The District shall have witnesses available in case agreement on a witness list is not reached. The parties shall be prepared at the end of each day of hearing to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the time the testimony each witness is expected to take.
The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness lists prior to the hearing, bearing in mind that evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear such evidence. The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony.
6. Telephonic Testimony. Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a
matter within the discretion of the ALJ. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g). Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall move in advance for leave to do so, unless the opposing party has stipulated that the witness may appear by telephone. Prior to the hearing, the proponent of the witness shall provide the proposed witness with a complete set of duplicate exhibit binders from all parties, containing all exhibits from each party, and instruct the witness not to remove any documents from the exhibit binders. The hearing room shall have sound equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and the witness to hear objections and rulings. Unless otherwise ordered, the witness shall testify on a land- line telephone while alone in a private room. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all these requirements have been fulfilled.
Charter Schools’ request to have Francisca Mendoza, Craig Cotter and Casey Rasmussen testify telephonically is granted if they are called as witnesses by Charter Schools and permitted to testify at the hearing. Charter Schools shall provide each witness with a complete set of duplicate tabbed exhibit binders from all parties, containing all exhibits from each party, and instruct the witness not to remove any documents from the exhibit binders.
Unless otherwise ordered, the witness shall testify on a land-line telephone while alone in a private room. Charter Schools shall ensure that the hearing room has sound equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and the witness to hear objections and rulings.
7. Motions. At present no prehearing motions are pending or contemplated. Any
prehearing motion filed after the prehearing conference shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause why the motion was not made prior to or at the prehearing conference.
8. Stipulations. Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are
encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in written form.
The parties shall meet and confer by June 3, 2015 to determine legal and factual stipulations, if any, to be submitted at hearing.
9. Conduct of Counsel and Hearing Room Decorum. Counsel, all parties, and all
witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times.
Cellular phones, pagers, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off during the hearing unless permission to the contrary is obtained from the ALJ.
There shall be no texting permitted while the hearing is in session.
10. Compensatory Education/Reimbursement. Any party seeking reimbursement
of expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of expenditures, as part of its case in chief. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.
11. Special Needs and Accommodations. At present neither party anticipates the
need for special accommodation for any witness or party, or for translation services.
A party or participant to this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in the hearing may contact the assigned calendar clerk at (916) 263-0880 or the OAH ADA Coordinator at OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov or (916) 263-0880 as soon as the need is made known. Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at http://www.dgs.ca.gov/oah/Home/Accommodations.aspx.
12. Hearing Open To the Public. At the request of Student, the hearing will be
open to the public.
13. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue working together
to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.
IF A FULL AND FINAL WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS REACHED
AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A
VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035. THE
PARTIES SHOULD ALSO LEAVE CONTACT INFORMATION SUCH AS CELLULAR
PHONE NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY. THE
PARTIES SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY FAX THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE
SIGNED AGREEMENT OR A LETTER WITHDRAWING THE CASE TO THE
OAH AT THE FAXINATION LINE at 916-376-6319.
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.
If the matter settles subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement as noted above, the parties shall submit a request for a status conference and provide the date of the next board meeting. The hearing dates will not be cancelled without this information.
14. Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of evidence or
other sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: May 18, 2015
/ S/
LAURIE GORSLINE
Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
