California OAH special education order · February 12, 2016
Order Following Prehearing Conference
OAH Case No. 2015110053 · ALJ B. Andrea Miles
OAH set the hearing on whether San Bruno's July 21, 2015 IEP offered Student a FAPE in the least restrictive environment. It denied Parent's request for more time to exchange evidence and allowed Parent to audio-record the hearing.
This case went to decision
San Bruno Park Unified School District v. Student: San Bruno Park Unified's July 2015 kindergarten IEP, with full inclusion and a full-time aide, offered FAPE in the LRE. (2016)
Summary
After a prehearing conference in San Bruno Park School District's due process case, OAH set a four-day hearing starting February 22, 2016. The single issue is whether the district's July 21, 2015 IEP offered Student a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment. Parent, representing herself, asked for one extra day beyond the February 12 deadline to exchange her evidence binder. The ALJ denied the request, told Parent to provide the binder as soon as possible, and said she would decide at hearing whether late evidence comes in. The ALJ also granted Parent's request to audio-record the hearing on conditions, opened the hearing to the public at Student's request, and put the district first because it carries the burden of proof.
Why it matters
The five-business-day evidence exchange deadline is enforced even for self-represented parents, so families should prepare binders early or risk having exhibits excluded. Parents may ask in advance to make their own audio recording of the hearing.
Key authority cited
- Ed. Code, § 56505, subd. (e)(7)
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g)
- Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49
People named in the order
- Sue Digre, Advocate with Parca, present as moral support for Parent
- Shawn Olson Brown, Attorney for San Bruno Park School District
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
SAN BRUNO PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT, OAH Case No. 2015110053 v. ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING
CONFERENCE
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT.
On February 9, 2016, a telephonic prehearing conference was held before Administrative Law Judge B. Andrea Miles, Office of Administrative Hearings. Shawn Olson Brown, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of San Bruno Park School District.
Mother, appeared on behalf of Student. Sue Digre, an advocate with the organization, Parca, was present as moral support for Mother.1 The PHC was recorded.
Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:
1. Hearing Dates, Times, and Location. The hearing shall take place on
February 22, 23, 24, and 25, 2016, and continuing day to day, Monday through Thursday, at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall take place at John Muir Elementary School located at 130 Cambridge Lane, Room 13, San Bruno, California 94066. The hearing shall begin at 1:30 PM the first day of the hearing and at 9:00 a.m. all other days, unless otherwise ordered.
As ordered in the scheduling order, the named local educational agency shall provide a facility for the hearing that fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C.A. § 12101 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), and all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities. The named local educational agency certified that the facilities used for this case comply with the law. The local educational agency shall inform OAH within two days of the date of this order if it is unable to comply with this order.
Prior to the beginning of the hearing, District shall ensure that the hearing room is configured into a courtroom setting and shall have at a minimum (1) a table for Student and his representatives; (2) a table for District’s legal representative and special education representative; (3) a table for the witness; and (4) a table for the ALJ, near an electrical outlet. District shall provide drinking water and tissue to all parties, witnesses and the ALJ.
Ms. Digre intends to be present at the hearing only as moral support for Parent.
The same hearing room shall be used for each day of hearing and shall be available at least one hour prior to the commencement of the hearing each day. The hearing room shall be locked following the hearing each night. District shall ensure that the hearing room and access to it are in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify.
A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.
2. Issues and Proposed Resolutions. The issue at the due process hearing, and
the proposed resolutions, are listed below.
Issue: Did San Bruno’s July 21, 2015 Individualized Education Program offer Student a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment? Proposed Resolution: San Bruno seeks and order finding that its July 21, 2015 Individualized Education Program offered Student a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment.
3. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring exhibit
binders prior to the hearing. The parties shall use numbers to identify exhibits, but shall place the letter “S” or “D” in front of the exhibit to designate if it is a Student or District exhibit (for example, “S-5, S-6, or D-1, D-2”). Each exhibit shall be internally paginated by exhibit, or all of a party’s exhibits shall be Bates-stamped. Each exhibit binder shall contain a detailed table of contents. The parties shall serve their evidence binders on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7).
Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7) requires that the parties exchange their evidence five business days prior to the beginning of the hearing. In this case, under Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7), the parties are required exchange their evidence by 5:00 PM on February 12, 2016. During the PHC, Parent indicated that she would be unable to provide San Bruno with her evidence binder by 5:00 PM on February 12, 2016, and requested a one day extension. Parent’s request was denied and Parent was directed to provide San Bruno with her evidence binder as soon as possible. At the hearing, the ALJ will determine whether any evidence that not exchanged in a timely manner will be admitted into evidence.
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not timely exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless it is supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
At the hearing, each party shall supply an exhibit binder containing its exhibits for use by the ALJ, and a second exhibit binder for use by witnesses. The parties should also have an exhibit binder for their use during the hearing. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH prior to the hearing. In the event of duplicate exhibits, the most legible version will be used.
4. Witnesses. Each party is responsible for procuring the attendance at hearing
of its own witnesses. Each party shall make witnesses under its control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness lists prior to the hearing, bearing in mind that evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear.
The parties shall attempt to reach agreement on a witness list for the first day of hearing. San Bruno shall have witnesses available in case agreement on a witness list is not reached. Prior to the commencement of the due process hearing, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for direct and cross-examination of each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses, and the ALJ will finalize the witness schedule.
Additionally, the parties shall be prepared at the end of each day of hearing to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the time the testimony of each such witness is expected to take.
5. Scope of Witness Examination. Each witness shall be called to testify only
once, except for rebuttal purposes, and all parties shall examine the witness on all issues when the witness is first called. After the first direct and cross-examinations, each party shall be limited in examining the witness to only those matters raised in the immediately preceding examination. The order in which the parties present their cases in chief shall be subordinate to the need for each witness to appear only once.
6. Telephonic Testimony. Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a
matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall move in advance for leave to do so, unless the opposing party has stipulated that the witness may appear by telephone. The proponent of the witness shall provide the proposed witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties, containing all of each party’s exhibits, prior to the hearing; and shall ensure that the hearing room has sound equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all these requirements have been fulfilled.
7. Electronic Recording of Hearing.
a. Audio Recording. Parent’s motion to make an audio recording of the
hearing is granted, subject to the following conditions: 1) that OAH’s recording is the only official recording; 2) that the recording will be turned on and off at the same time as the ALJ’s recording, in order to avoid recording conversations while off the record; and 3) that operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay the hearing. If San Bruno desires to make such a recording, San Bruno shall move for leave to do so in advance of the hearing, and the same conditions shall apply.
b. Video Recording. No party, witness or anyone else present may
make any video recording of any part of the proceedings. Any person doing so shall be subject to sanctions.
8. Order of Presentation of Evidence. In an administrative proceeding, the
burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005)
546 U.S. 49, 56-62 [126 S.Ct. 528, 163 L.Ed.2d 387].) Here, San Bruno is the petitioning party. Accordingly, San Bruno shall present its case-in-chief, followed by Student.
9. Motions. Parent indicated that she may file a due process complaint against
San Bruno and move to consolidate the two cases. All motions need to be in writing and filed on the opposing party as well as OAH. Any motion filed after this date shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause as to why the motion was not made prior to or during the prehearing conference of February 12, 2016.
10. Compensatory Education/Reimbursement. Any party seeking reimbursement
of expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of expenditures, as part of its case in chief. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.
11. Stipulations. Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are
encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in written form.
12. Conduct of Counsel and Hearing Room Decorum. Counsel, all parties, and all
witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times.
Cellular phones, pagers, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless permission to the contrary is obtained from the
ALJ.
13. Special Needs and Accommodations. A party or participant to this case, such as
a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in the mediation or hearing may contact the assigned calendar staff, identified in the scheduling order, at (916) 263-0880, as soon as the need is known. Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at:
http://www.dgs.ca.gov/oah/Home/Accommodations.aspx
14. Hearing Open To the Public. At the request of Student, the hearing will be
open to the public. In the event that either party intends to have the media present during the hearing they must immediately inform OAH.
15. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue working together
to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.
IF A FULL AND FINAL WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS REACHED
AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A
VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035. THE
PARTIES SHOULD ALSO LEAVE CONTACT INFORMATION SUCH AS CELLULAR
PHONE NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY. THE
PARTIES SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY FAX THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE
SIGNED AGREEMENT OR A LETTER WITHDRAWING THE CASE TO THE OAH AT
THE FAXINATION LINE at 916-376-6319.
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.
16. Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of evidence or
other sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: February 12, 2016 /s/
B. ANDREA MILES
Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
