California OAH special education order · October 3, 2016

Order Following Prehearing Conference of October 3, 2016

OAH Case No. 2016030188, 2016070924 · ALJ Darrell Lepkowsky

OAH set three issues for Student's hearing against Dehesa and its charter school. It refused to expand the behavior issue to cover academic instruction because neither complaint mentioned those services.

Issues set for hearing Prehearing conference orders

This case went to decision

Student v. Dehesa Elementary School District et al.: Dehesa Elementary and Community Montessori Charter changed a kindergartner's placement without consent or notice; $500, 42 compensatory hours, training ordered. (2016)

Summary

After a telephonic prehearing conference, ALJ Darrell Lepkowsky set Student's three issues for hearing: Parent participation and prior written notice, behavioral services, and extended school year services. He granted Student's motion to move the hearing to OAH's San Diego office, allowed witness Leigh Brown to testify by telephone because of a medical condition, and allowed counsel to make audio recordings of the hearing. He denied Student's request to add specialized academic instruction to the issues because neither complaint raised it, denied Districts' request to present Brown's testimony by affidavit, and dismissed on OAH's own motion Student's request for attorney's fees as beyond OAH's jurisdiction.

Why it matters

Hearing issues are limited to what the written complaint actually alleges, so parents must plead every service they want to challenge, such as academic instruction. OAH also cannot award attorney's fees in a due process decision.

Key authority cited

  • Ed. Code § 56505(e)(7)
  • Ed. Code § 56505(e)(8)
  • Ed. Code § 56505.1(h)
  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082(g)
  • Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49

People named in the order

  • Leigh Brown, Districts' witness (permitted to testify telephonically)
  • Terri Novacek, Executive Director, Element Education (appeared for Districts)

Topics

prehearing conference scope of issues telephonic testimony attorney's fees venue change charter school

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In the Matter of:

PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH Case Nos. 2016030188 and 2016070924 v.

ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING

DEHESA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONFERENCE OF OCTOBER 3, 2016

DISTRICT and COMMUNITY

MONTESSORI CHARTER SCHOOL.

On October 3, 2016, a telephonic prehearing conference was held before Administrative Law Judge Darrell Lepkowsky, Office of Administrative Hearings.

Meagan M. Nuñez and Jennifer Varga, Attorneys at Law, appeared on behalf of Student.

Deborah R.G. Cesario, Attorney at Law, and Terri Novacek, Executive Director for Element Education, appeared on behalf of the Dehesa Elementary School District and the Community Montessori Charter School (collectively Districts). The ALJ recorded the PHC.

Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:

1. Hearing Dates and Times. The hearing shall take place on October 11, 13, 17,

and 18, 2016, and will continue day to day, Monday through Thursday, at the discretion of the ALJ.

2. Hearing Location. Student’s motion to change the venue of the hearing is

granted. The hearing shall now take place at the Office of Administrative Hearings, 1350 Front Street, Suite 3005, San Diego, California, 92101. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 a.m. on October 11, 2016, and at 9:00 a.m. all other days, unless otherwise ordered.

The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify.

A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.

3. Issues and Proposed Resolutions. The issues at the due process hearing, and

the proposed resolutions, are listed below.1 Student’s Issues:2 A. Did Districts deny Student a free appropriate public education from February 3, 2016, to May 23, 2016, by preventing Parents from meaningfully participating in Student’s individualized education program process by:

i. Unilaterally changing Student’s placement without Parents’ consent;

and, ii. Failing to provide prior written notice regarding the change in placement? B. From February 3, 2016, to May 23, 2016, did Districts deny Student a FAPE by failing offer him behavioral services and supports tailored to his unique needs or reasonably calculated to provide him with educational benefit?3 C. Did Districts deny Student a FAPE by failing to offer him extended school year services for summer 2016? Student’s Proposed Resolutions:4 1) An order that Districts fund compensatory education for Student and any further relief the ALJ deems appropriate.

4. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring exhibit binders

prior to the hearing. The parties shall use numbers to identify exhibits, but shall place the letter “S” or “D” in front of the exhibit to designate if it is a Student or District exhibit (for example, “S-5, S-6,” or “D-1, D-2”). Each exhibit shall be internally paginated by exhibit, or In their prehearing conference statement, as confirmed at the PHC, Districts withdrew their complaint in case number 2016050107, without prejudice, based upon Student’s enrollment in another school district.

Student has withdrawn all other issues alleged in his two complaints.

Student’s request to expand this issue to include a denial of appropriate specialized academic instruction is denied based upon the lack of reference to those services in either of Student’s complaints.

Student’s request for attorney’s fees is beyond the jurisdiction of OAH and is sua sponte dismissed for purposes of any decision OAH may issue in this matter.

all of a party’s exhibits shall be Bates-stamped. Each exhibit binder shall contain a detailed table of contents. The parties shall serve their evidence binders on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). At the hearing, each party shall supply an exhibit binder containing its exhibits for use by the ALJ, and a second exhibit binder for use by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH prior to the hearing.

To the extent practicable, exhibits in the exhibit binders shall be in chronological order.

In the event of duplicate exhibits, the most legible version will be used. The parties shall meet and confer by 5:00 p.m. on October 6, 2016, to delete duplicate exhibits from the exhibit binders. The parties are not required to renumber exhibits if they delete exhibits after the exchange of documents.

The parties shall exchange resumes for each witness who is expected to testify as to their professional credentials. Notwithstanding the requirements of Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7), the parties shall exchange resumes and curriculum vitae by 5:00 p.m. on October 6, 2016.

If the parties intend to rely on IEP’s, the parties shall attach all pages of the IEP(s), including copies of all actual signatures on the IEP(s) and any typewritten or handwritten notes or comments, if any, written on the IEP(s). Excerpts of an audio record of an IEP team meeting, if any, should, in addition to the audio record offered, be transcribed and offered as documentary evidence; that portion of the audio record transcribed shall be provided to the opposing party along with the transcript to allow an opportunity to verify the accuracy of the transcription. Transcriptions need not be prepared by a certified court reporter.

Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not timely exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless it is supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and the ALJ rules that it is admissible. Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(8), affords each party the right to prohibit the introduction of any evidence at the hearing that has not been timely exchanged.

5. Witnesses. Each party is responsible for procuring the attendance at hearing

of its own witnesses, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify. Each party shall make witnesses under its control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order.

The parties shall comply with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). No party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ. Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(8), affords each party the right to prohibit the introduction of any evidence at the hearing that has not been timely disclosed.

During the Prehearing Conference, the parties were ordered to meet and confer by no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 6, 2016, at 5:00 p.m., and identify the witnesses the witness lists who cannot be produced at hearing without a subpoena and provide the witnesses contact information to opposing counsel so that subpoenas can be issued. As part of the meet and confer process, Districts’ counsel shall inform Student’s counsel as to whether the witnesses on Student’s witness list are employed by or otherwise under the control of District and will be produced at hearing, and if not, shall provide Student’s counsel with the most recent contact information for that witness no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 6, 2016, at 5:00 p.m.

On the first day of hearing before the first witness testifies, the parties shall provide the ALJ with one joint detailed hour-by-hour schedule of all witnesses expected to testify at hearing, which list shall also include an estimate of time for each party’s direct and cross- examination. The parties shall meet and confer each day of hearing to revise the witness schedule as needed.

Each witness will only be called once to testify, except for rebuttal purposes, and all parties shall examine the witness when the witness is first called. District shall have witnesses available in case agreement on a witness list is not reached. The parties shall be prepared at the end of each day of hearing to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the time the testimony each witness is expected to take.

The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness lists prior to the hearing, bearing in mind that evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear such evidence. The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony. Education Code, section 56505.1, subdivision (h), empowers the ALJ presiding at a due process hearing to set a reasonable limit on the length of the hearing after consideration of all of the following: (i) issues to be heard, (ii) complexity of facts to be proven, (iii) ability of the parties or their representatives to present their respective cases, and (iv) estimates of the parties as to the time needed to present their respective cases.

6. Scope of Witness Examination. Each witness shall be called to testify only

once, except for rebuttal purposes, and all parties shall examine the witness on all issues when the witness is first called. After the first direct and cross-examinations, each party shall be limited in examining the witness to only those matters raised in the immediately preceding examination. The order in which the parties present their cases in chief shall be subordinate to the need for each witness to appear only once. Unless otherwise ordered, only one round of redirect and/or re-cross examination shall be permitted.

7. Telephonic Testimony. Districts indicated that witness Leigh Brown has a

medical condition that prevents her from testifying in person. The parties therefore have requested that she testify telephonically.5 The request is granted.

Districts’ request to present Ms. Brown’s testimony by affidavit is denied.

Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Prior to the hearing, the proponent of the witness shall provide the proposed witness with a complete set of duplicate copies of the exhibit binders from all parties, containing all of each party’s exhibits and shall instruct the witness not to remove any documents from the exhibit binders. Physical copies in binders must be provided. Faxed or electronic copies are unacceptable.

8. Electronic Recording of Hearing.

a. Audio Recording. The ALJ shall record the hearing and the ALJ’s

recording is the only official record of the hearing. No person shall record or photograph the proceedings unless otherwise permitted by the ALJ.

The parties’ motion to make an audio recording of the hearing is granted. Student’s counsel and Districts’ counsel shall be permitted to make an audio recording subject to the following conditions: 1) OAH’s recording is the only official recording; 2) the recording will be turned on and off at the same time as the ALJ’s recording, to avoid recording conversations while off the record; 3) operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay the hearing; 4) such recording shall be for counsel’s personal use only and only for review and preparation of the hearing; 5) the recording device shall be turned on only when the ALJ states that the matter is on the record, and shall be turned off when the ALJ states that the matter is off the record; 6) counsel shall not play any part of the recording for any prospective witness and the recording shall not be disseminated to anyone other than counsel; 7) the parties shall not use the recording in any subsequent due process hearing or other proceeding; 8) No more than one person for each party may record the hearing; and 9) the parties shall destroy the unofficial recording when the decision in this case becomes final and/or all appeals are exhausted.

Any recording made by counsel is not the official record and is permitted as a courtesy, unless otherwise ordered by the hearing ALJ.

b. Video Recording/Photography. No party, witness or anyone else

present may make any video recording or take any photographs of any part of the proceedings. Any person doing so shall be subject to sanctions.

9. Order of Presentation of Evidence. In an administrative proceeding, the

burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005)

546 U.S. 49, 56-62 [126 S.Ct. 528, 163 L.Ed.2d 387].) Student will therefore present his case first, followed by Districts, subject to the order in Item 6 above.

10. Motions. The ALJ granted the following motions during the PHC:

1) Student’s motion to change venue; 2) the parties’ motion to take the testimony of Ms.

Brown telephonically; and, 3) the parties’ motion to record the hearing.

Student’s motion for administrative notice of the order granting Student’s motion for stay put in this case is denied as unnecessary as that order is a part of the record of this case.

Any other motion filed after the date of this PHC shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause as to why the motion was not made prior to or during the prehearing conference of October 3, 2016.

11. Compensatory Education/Reimbursement. Any party seeking reimbursement

of expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of expenditures, as part of its case in chief. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.

12. Stipulations. Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are

encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in written form.

The parties shall meet and confer by 5:00 p.m. on October 6, 2016, to determine legal and factual stipulations, if any, to be submitted at hearing.

13. Conduct of Counsel and Hearing Room Decorum. Counsel, all parties, and all

witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times.

Cellular phones, pagers, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off during the hearing unless permission to the contrary is obtained from the ALJ. There shall be no texting permitted while the hearing is in session, unless otherwise permitted by the hearing ALJ. No eating is permitted in the hearing room while the ALJ is on the record.

14. Special Needs and Accommodations. Student has withdrawn his request for a

Spanish language interpreter.

Neither party requested any additional accommodations. A party or participant to this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in the mediation or hearing may contact the assigned calendar staff, identified in the scheduling order, at (916) 263- 0880, as soon as the need is known. Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at:

http://www.dgs.ca.gov/oah/Home/Accessibility.aspx.

15. The Hearing Will Be Closed To the Public.

16. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue working together

to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.

IF A FULL AND FINAL WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS REACHED

AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A

VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035. THE

PARTIES SHOULD ALSO LEAVE CONTACT INFORMATION SUCH AS CELLULAR

PHONE NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY. THE

PARTIES SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY FAX THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE

SIGNED AGREEMENT OR A LETTER WITHDRAWING THE CASE TO THE

OAH AT THE FAXINATION LINE at 916-376-6319.

Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.

If the parties settle the matter subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement as noted above, the parties shall submit a request for a status conference and provide the date of the next board meeting. OAH will not cancel the hearing dates without this information.

17. Failure to Comply. The failure to comply with this order may result in the

exclusion of evidence or other sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: October 3, 2016

DARRELL LEPKOWSKY

Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings