California OAH special education order · May 4, 2016
Order of Determination of Sufficiency of Due Process Complaint
OAH Case No. 2016050118 · ALJ Joy Redmon
OAH found Student's complaint insufficient because its claim that the placement was "unsafe" did not connect to special education issues under the IDEA, and its proposed resolution was vague.
Summary
Antelope Valley challenged the sufficiency of Student's due process complaint. The complaint alleged that Student's placement was "unsafe" because of improper supervision and a need for more security, and asked only for "the children to be safe." OAH found the complaint insufficient because it did not explain how the safety concerns related to special education claims under the IDEA, and its proposed resolution was not well defined. Student was given 14 days to file an amended complaint or face dismissal, and all dates were vacated.
Why it matters
A complaint about school safety must tie the concern to the student's disability, IEP, placement, or FAPE, and should propose a specific remedy. Self-represented parents can ask OAH for a mediator to help identify issues and remedies before amending.
Key authority cited
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(7)(A)
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(c)(2)(D)
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(c)(2)(E)(i)(II)
- Ed. Code, § 56505
- Sen. Rep. No. 108-185 (2003)
- 71 Fed.Reg. 46540-46541, 46699 (Aug. 14, 2006)
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH Case No. 2016050118 v. ORDER OF DETERMINATION OF
SUFFICIENCY OF DUE PROCESS
ANTELOPE VALLEY UNION HIGH COMPLAINT
SCHOOL DISTRICT.
On May 3, 2016, Student filed a due process hearing request naming Antelope Valley Union High School District as Respondent. On May 3, 2016, Antelope Valley filed a Notice of Insufficiency regarding the issues and proposed resolutions contained in Student’s complaint.
APPLICABLE LAW
The named parties to a due process hearing request have the right to challenge the sufficiency of the complaint. (20 U.S.C. § 1415(b) & (c).) The party filing the complaint is not entitled to a hearing unless the complaint meets the requirements of title 20 United States Code section 1415(b)(7)(A).
A complaint is sufficient if it contains: (1) a description of the nature of the problem of the child relating to the proposed initiation or change concerning the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the child, or the provision of a free appropriate public education to the child; (2) facts relating to the problem; and (3) a proposed resolution of the problem to the extent known and available to the party at the time. (20 U.S.C.
§ 1415(b)(7)(A)(ii)(III) & (IV).) These requirements prevent vague and confusing complaints, and promote fairness by providing the named parties with sufficient information to know how to prepare for the hearing and how to participate in resolution sessions and mediation. (See H.R.Rep. No. 108-77, 1st Sess. (2003), p. 115; Sen. Rep. No. 108-185, 1st Sess. (2003), pp. 34-35.)
The complaint provides enough information when it provides “an awareness and understanding of the issues forming the basis of the complaint.” (Sen. Rep. No. 108-185, supra, at p. 34.) The pleading requirements should be liberally construed in light of the broad remedial purposes of the IDEA and the relative informality of the due process hearings it authorizes. (Alexandra R. ex rel. Burke v. Brookline School Dist. (D.N.H., Sept. 10, 2009, CIV. 06-CV-0215-JL) 2009 WL 2957991[nonpub. opn.]; Escambia County Bd. of Educ. v.
Benton (S.D. Ala. 2005) 406 F.Supp.2d 1248, 1259-1260; Sammons v. Polk County School Bd. (M.D. Fla., Oct. 28, 2005, 8:04CV2657T24EAJ) 2005 WL 2850076 [nonpub. opn.]; but cf. M.S.-G v. Lenape Regional High School Dist. Bd. of Educ. (3d Cir. 2009) 306 Fed.Appx.
772, 775 [nonpub. opn.].) Whether the complaint is sufficient is a matter within the sound discretion of the Administrative Law Judge. (Assistance to States for the Educ. of Children with Disabilities & Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities (Aug. 14, 2006) 71 FR 46,540-46541, 46699.)
DISCUSSION
Student’s complaint is insufficiently pled in that it fails to provide Antelope Valley with the required notice of a description of the problem and the facts relating to the problem.
Student generally alleges that her placement is “unsafe.” The facts supporting this contention include improper supervision and the need for more security. It does not contain specific information regarding how this contention relates to special education claims arising under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Students only proposed resolution is the desire for “the children to be safe.” A complaint is required to include proposed resolutions to the problem, to the extent known and available to the party at the time. (20 U.S.C. §1415(b)(7)(A)(ii)(IV).) The proposed resolution stated in Student’s complaint is not well defined.
A parent who is not represented by an attorney may request that the Office of Administrative Hearings provide a mediator to assist the parent in identifying the issues and proposed resolutions that must be included in a complaint. (Ed. Code, § 56505.) Parents are encouraged to contact OAH for assistance if they intend to amend their due process hearing request.
ORDER
1. Student’s complaint is insufficiently pled under section title 20 United States
Code 1415(c)(2)(D).
2. Student shall be permitted to file an amended complaint under title 20 United
States Code section 1415(c)(2)(E)(i)(II).1
3. The amended complaint shall comply with the requirements of title 20 U.S.C.
section 1415(b)(7)(A)(ii), and shall be filed not later than 14 days from the date of this order.
1 The filing of an amended complaint will restart the applicable timelines for a due process hearing.
4. If Student fails to file a timely amended complaint, the complaint will be
dismissed.
5. All dates previously set in this matter are vacated.
DATE: May 4, 2016
JOY REDMON
Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings