California OAH special education order · September 19, 2016

Order Granting Motion to Allow Expert's Observation

OAH Case No. 2016060105 · ALJ Elsa H. Jones

OAH granted Student's motion and ordered that Student's behavioral expert may observe Student for a full school day, including unstructured time, because District no longer disputed the full-day observation.

Summary

Student asked OAH to allow Student's expert, Dr. Jeffery Hayden, to observe Student for a full school day. Earlier, District had limited his observation to an hour and a half after Student gave one day's notice and did not say how long the visit would last. Bonita Unified opposed the motion as unnecessary because it was willing to allow a full-day observation. Since the parties agreed a full day was appropriate, OAH ordered the observation at Ekstrand Elementary on September 21, 2016, or another agreed date.

Why it matters

Parents who plan an independent expert's school observation should give the district reasonable advance notice, including the date, time, and length of the visit. Last-minute or vague requests can lead to a shortened observation and an avoidable motion.

People named in the order

  • Jeffery Hayden, Ph.D., Student's expert (behavioral assessment)

Topics

expert observation independent assessment behavior classroom observation school access

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In the Matter of:

PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH Case No. 2016060105 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

ALLOW EXPERT’S OBSERVATION

ARCADIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT;

BONITA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

On September 12, 2016, Student filed a Motion to Allow Expert’s Observation, on the grounds that District did not permit Student’s expert to observe Student at school for a full day on September 7, 2016. Student contends that Student’s behavior is at issue in this matter, and Student’s expert, Jeffery Hayden, Ph.D., must observe Student for a full day as part of his behavioral assessment of Student. On September 15, 2016, Bonita Unified School District filed an opposition to the motion, on the grounds that the motion was unnecessary, as District was willing to permit Student’s expert to observe Student for a full day. District’s opposition papers further proposed that the observation occur on either September 16, September 19, or September 21, 2016.

The parties’ papers reflect that, for a variety of reasons, mostly involving the unavailability of another expert Student had retained, the Labor Day weekend, and Dr.

Hayden’s availability to perform an observation, Student did not give notice to District of the observation planned for September 7 until September 6. Student’s notice of the planned observation did not include a proposed time of day for the observation, or any indication of the length of the proposed observation. District did not agree that the observation could occur on September 7, 2016. However, in response to Student’s notification, District proposed that the observation occur on September 8 or September 9. Student insisted that Dr. Hayden’s observation occur on September 7. Dr. Hayden appeared at Student’s school on September 7, and he was permitted to observe Student’s classroom for one-and-one half hours. District did not learn until Dr. Hayden’s arrival at the school that he required a full day for his observation, and District did not permit Dr. Hayden a full day for the observation.

At this time, the parties do not dispute that Dr. Hayden may observe Student for a full day. Therefore, OAH orders as follows:

Dr. Hayden may observe Student at Student’s school, Ekstrand Elementary School, for a full school day, including during unstructured time, on September 21, 2016, or on any other date to which the parties agree.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: September 19, 2016

ELSA H. JONES

Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings