California OAH special education order · July 5, 2017

Order to Show Cause Why Costs Should Not Be Shifted and Matter Dismissed for Failing to Appear at Status Conference, Setting OSC Hearing and Continuing Status Conference

OAH Case No. 2017020711 · ALJ Margaret Gibson

OAH ordered Student's attorney to show cause why costs should not be shifted and the case dismissed after she failed to appear at a status conference set to track a pending settlement.

Order to show cause issued Sanctions and cost-shifting

Summary

The parties had reported a settlement pending school board approval, vacated hearing dates, and asked for a status conference after the board meeting. Student's attorney, Kathleen Loyer, did not appear at the July 5, 2017 status conference and could not be reached by phone. On its own motion, OAH ordered her to file a declaration explaining her absence by July 7, 2017 and to appear at a July 12, 2017 order to show cause hearing on cost-shifting and dismissal. The status conference was continued to follow that hearing, and the District was told it could seek costs by filing a declaration and appearing.

Why it matters

Even when a case has settled pending board approval, the attorney of record must attend every scheduled OAH conference or tell OAH the case is resolved. Missing an appearance can lead to dismissal of the complaint and cost-shifting against the attorney.

Key authority cited

  • Gov. Code, § 11455.30
  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3088
  • Code Civ. Proc., § 128.5
  • Levy v. Blum (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 625
  • West Coast Development v. Reed (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 693
  • 20 U.S.C. § 1415(f)(1)(B)(ii)

People named in the order

  • Kathleen Loyer, Student's attorney
  • Margaret Gibson, Presiding Administrative Law Judge

Topics

order to show cause failure to appear status conference cost shifting pending settlement dismissal

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In the Matter of:

PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH Case No. 2017020711 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

COSTS SHOULD NOT BE SHIFTED

PLACENTIA-YORBA LINDA UNIFIED AND MATTER DISMISSED FOR

SCHOOL DISTRICT. FAILING TO APPEAR AT STATUS

CONFERENCE, SETTING OSC

HEARING AND CONTINUING

STATUS CONFERENCE

On July 5, 2017, a telephonic status conference was scheduled at the request of the parties. The parties had notified the Office of Administrative Hearings on June 2, 2017 that they had reached a settlement pending the approval of the school board. As such, the parties requested that the hearing dates be vacated and a status conference set after the date on which the board was set to consider the settlement agreement. Student did not notify OAH prior to the settlement conference that the settlement was approved and to dismiss the case, therefore the status conference remained on calendar for the purpose of setting hearing dates or rescheduling the status conference because the board had failed to consider the settlement.

Student’s attorney Kathleen Loyer failed to appear for the status conference. Ms.

Loyer was called at both her office telephone number and her cell number. There was no answer at either number.

APPLICABLE LAW

If the parent and local education agency have not resolved the due process complaint within 30 days of the receipt of the complaint, OAH is required to issue a decision within the next 45 days, unless a continuance is granted for good cause. (20 U.S.C. § 1415(f)(1)(B)(ii);

34 C.F.R. § 300.51; Ed. Code, § 56502, subd. (f).)

An ALJ presiding over a hearing may “order a party, the party’s attorney or other authorized representative, or both, to pay reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by another party as a result of bad faith actions or tactics that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay.” (Gov. Code, § 11455.30, subd. (a); Cal. Code. Regs., tit. 5, § 3088, subd. (a).) An order to pay expenses is enforceable in the same manner as a money judgment or by seeking a contempt of court order. (Gov. Code, § 11455.30, subd.

(b).)

“Actions or tactics” is defined as including, but not limited to, making or opposing motions or filing and serving a complaint. (Gov. Code, §11455.30, subd. (a); Code Civ.

Proc., § 128.5, subd. (b)(1).) “Frivolous” means totally and completely without merit or for the sole purpose of harassing an opposing party. (Gov. Code, § 11455.30, subd. (a); Code Civ. Proc., § 128.5, subd. (b)(2).) “Whether an action is frivolous is governed by an objective standard: any reasonable attorney would agree it is totally and completely without merit [citations].” (Levy v. Blum (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 625, 635.) In addition, there must be a showing of improper purpose. (Ibid.) A finding of “bad faith” does not require a determination of evil motive. (West Coast Development v. Reed (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 693, 702.)

DISCUSSION

Given the short time frames applicable to this case, it is critical that the parties follow orders issued by OAH and participate in advancing the matter to hearing or resolution.

Student’s counsel’s non-compliance with procedure and failure to participate put the timely resolution of this matter in doubt. As the attorney of record, Ms. Loyer is responsible for understanding and following OAH’s procedures, including making all required appearances.

Failure to do so may result in the complaint being dismissed and/or costs being shifted.

Ms. Loyer must file a declaration with an explanation as to why she failed to appear at the status conference no later than 5:00 p.m. Friday, July 7, 2017. Ms. Loyer is also ordered to appear telephonically at 1:00 p.m. on July 12, 2017, at which time the order to show cause will be heard.

The Status Conference is continued and shall immediately follow the order to show cause hearing, unless the matter has been dismissed prior. Respondent’s attorney may participate in the order to show cause hearing, but is not ordered to do so. However, if Respondent wishes to seek cost shifting, the attorney must file a declaration and appear at the order to show cause hearing detailing such costs. The attorney should advise OAH in this regard. Otherwise, Respondent’s attorney shall be contacted telephonically by OAH following the order to show cause hearing.

ORDER

1. An order to show cause hearing shall be convened telephonically by OAH at

1:00 p.m. on July 12, 2017. Student’s attorney is ordered to appear.

2. The Status Conference is continued to July 12, 2017, and shall begin immediately

following the order to show cause hearing, should Student’s attorney provide an acceptable explanation for her failure to appear at the status conference on July 5, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATE: July 5, 2017

MARGARET GIBSON

Presiding Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings