California OAH special education order · November 13, 2017
Order of Determination of Sufficiency of Due Process Complaint
OAH Case No. 2017101198 · ALJ Judith Pasewark
OAH found Student's complaint against Antioch and Spectrum sufficient, ruling that Antioch's objections were defenses to the claims rather than a failure to give notice of the issues.
Summary
Antioch filed a notice of insufficiency challenging Student's due process complaint against Antioch and Spectrum Center Schools, Delta Campus. OAH found that the complaint identified its issues and gave enough related facts for the District to respond and take part in a resolution session and mediation. The ALJ ruled that Antioch's arguments were defenses to the claims, not a lack of notice, and deemed all four claims sufficient. All mediation, prehearing conference, and hearing dates were confirmed.
Why it matters
A sufficiency challenge only tests whether the complaint gives fair notice of the issues. Disagreeing with the merits of a parent's claims is a defense for the hearing, not a reason to find the complaint insufficient.
Key authority cited
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(7)(A)
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(c)(2)(C)
- Ed. Code § 56502, subd. (d)(1)
- Sen. Rep. No. 108-185
- Escambia County Bd. of Educ. v. Benton (S.D. Ala. 2005) 406 F.Supp.2d 1248
- 71 Fed. Reg. 46540-46541, 46699
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH Case No. 2017101198 v. ORDER OF DETERMINATION OF
SUFFICIENCY OF DUE PROCESS
ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPLAINT
AND SPECTRUM CENTER SCHOOLS,
DELTA CAMPUS.
On October 25, 2017, Student filed a Due Process Hearing Request1 (complaint) with the Office of Administrative Hearings naming Antioch Unified School District (Antioch) and Spectrum Center Schools, Delta Campus (Spectrum). On November 9, 2017, Antioch filed a [Notice of Insufficiency as to Student’s complaint.
APPLICABLE LAW
The named parties to a due process hearing request have the right to challenge the sufficiency of the complaint. (20 U.S.C. § 1415(b) & (c).) The party filing the complaint is not entitled to a hearing unless the complaint meets the requirements of title 20 United States Code section 1415(b)(7)(A).
A complaint is sufficient if it contains: (1) a description of the nature of the problem of the child relating to the proposed initiation or change concerning the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the child, or the provision of a free appropriate public education to the child; (2) facts relating to the problem; and (3) a proposed resolution of the problem to the extent known and available to the party at the time. (20 U.S.C.
§ 1415(b)(7)(A)(ii)(III) & (IV).) These requirements prevent vague and confusing complaints, and promote fairness by providing the named parties with sufficient information to know how to prepare for the hearing and how to participate in resolution sessions and mediation. (See H.R.Rep. No. 108-77, 1st Sess. (2003), p. 115; Sen. Rep. No. 108-185, 1st Sess. (2003), pp. 34-35.)
A request for a due process hearing under Education Code section 56502 is the due process complaint notice required under title 20 U.S.C. section 1415(b)(7)(A).
The complaint provides enough information when it provides “an awareness and understanding of the issues forming the basis of the complaint.” (Sen. Rep. No. 108-185, supra, at p. 34.) The pleading requirements should be liberally construed in light of the broad remedial purposes of the IDEA and the relative informality of the due process hearings it authorizes. (Alexandra R. ex rel. Burke v. Brookline School Dist. (D.N.H., Sept. 10, 2009, CIV. 06-CV-0215-JL) 2009 WL 2957991[nonpub. opn.]; Escambia County Bd. of Educ. v.
Benton (S.D. Ala. 2005) 406 F.Supp.2d 1248, 1259-1260; Sammons v. Polk County School Bd. (M.D. Fla., Oct. 28, 2005, 8:04CV2657T24EAJ) 2005 WL 2850076 [nonpub. opn.]; but cf. M.S.-G v. Lenape Regional High School Dist. Bd. of Educ. (3d Cir. 2009) 306 Fed.Appx.
772, 775 [nonpub. opn.].) Whether the complaint is sufficient is a matter within the sound discretion of the Administrative Law Judge. (Assistance to States for the Educ. of Children with Disabilities & Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities (Aug. 14, 2006) 71 FR 46,540-46541, 46699.)
DISCUSSION
The facts alleged in Student’s complaint are sufficient to put the District on notice of the issues forming the basis of the complaint. Student’s complaint identifies the issues and adequate related facts about the problem to permit District/Student to respond to the complaint and participate in a resolution session and mediation. District’s contentions regarding Student’s complaint represent defenses to Student’s complaint, rather than a failure to provide an awareness of the issues forming the basis of Student’s complaint.
Therefore, Student’s statement of the four claims is sufficient.
ORDER
1. The complaint is deemed sufficient under title 20 United States Code section
1415(c)(2)(C) and Education Code section 56502, subdivision (d)(1).
2. All mediation, prehearing conference, and hearing dates in this matter are
confirmed.
DATE: November 13, 2017
JUDITH PASEWARK
Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings