California OAH special education order · August 15, 2018

Order Denying Motion to Compel Tehachapi to Confirm That It Will Consider Settling All Claims in This Matter, or in the Alternative, That It Waive the Resolution Session

OAH Case No. 2018070708 · ALJ Cynthia Fritz

OAH denied Student's motion to compel Tehachapi to confirm it could settle all claims or to waive the resolution session. OAH does not force parties to consider settlement or to waive the mandatory resolution session.

This case went to decision

Student v. Tehachapi Unified School District: Tehachapi Unified must provide 44 hours of speech therapy, social skills sessions and two IEEs; most other claims denied. (2018)

Summary

Student asked OAH to order Tehachapi to confirm it could settle the whole case, because Parent's spouse is a Tehachapi school board trustee. In the alternative, Student asked OAH to order Tehachapi to waive the resolution session. OAH denied both requests. It explained that each party decides for itself whether it can settle, and that Tehachapi had already stated its settlement position in writing. OAH also found that a resolution session is mandatory unless both sides agree in writing to waive it, and Student cited no authority giving OAH power to compel either result.

Why it matters

Families cannot use OAH to force a district to discuss settlement or to skip the resolution session. A waiver requires the district's written agreement, or both sides can agree to go to mediation instead.

Key authority cited

  • 34 C.F.R. § 300.510(a)
  • 34 C.F.R. § 300.510(c)

Topics

resolution session settlement waiver motion to compel school board conflict

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In the Matter of:

PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH Case No. 2018070708 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

COMPEL TEHACHAPI TO CONFIRM

TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL THAT IT WILL CONSIDER SETTLING

DISTRICT. ALL CLAIMS IN THIS MATTER, OR

IN THE ALTERANTIVE, THAT IT

WAIVE THE RESOLUTION SESSION

On July 16, 2018, Parent on behalf of Student, filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings a Request for Due Process Hearing, naming Tehachapi Unified School District.

On August 7, 2018, Parent on behalf of Student, filed a Motion to Compel, seeking an order confirming that Tehachapi can settle this matter in its entirely, or in the alternative, an order compelling Tehachapi to waive the resolution session. Student contends that Parent’s spouse is a Tehachapi school board trustee and there is a question if Tehachapi can fully settle the case. If Tehachapi cannot confirm this, Student requests OAH compel it to waive the resolution session.

APPLICABLE LAW AND DISCUSSION

A school district, or local education agency, must convene a meeting to discuss the issues raised in a due process complaint in order to attempt to resolve the dispute. (34 C.F.R.

§ 300.510 (a)(1),(2).) This meeting is commonly known as a resolution session. A resolution session need not be held if the parent and school district agree in writing to waive it (Id. at § 300.510 (a)(3)(i)) or if the parent and school district agree to use mediation instead of a resolution session (Id. at § 300.510 (a)(3)(ii)). If the parties agree to waive the resolution session, the 45-day timeline for a due process hearing begins the day after the waiver. (Id. at § 300.510(c)(1).) However, the timeline does not automatically begin if the parties agree to use mediation instead of a resolution session. (Id. at § 300.510(c).)

While OAH encourages settlement, it is up to each party to determine if it can settle all portions of a case. Here, Tehachapi reiterated its position regarding settlement to Student in its August 7, 2018, correspondence. Further, OAH does not compel parties to consider settling a case, regardless of the circumstances or ability for a party to settle. Moreover, Student failed to provide any authority supporting her position that OAH can compel a party to confirm that they can fully settle a case.

Additionally, OAH does not compel parties to waive their mandatory resolution session. A resolution session is mandatory unless both parties agree to waive it, and Student failed to cite any law that OAH has jurisdiction to waive a party’s resolution session. For these reasons, Student’s motion to compel is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: August 15, 2018

CYNTHIA FRITZ

Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings