California OAH special education order · April 8, 2019
Order Following Prehearing Conference and Granting Los Angeles' Request for Continuance
OAH Case No. 2019030744 · ALJ Cole Dalton
OAH granted Los Angeles' request for a brief continuance over Parent's objection, finding good cause based on witness unavailability in a newly filed case, and reset the hearing to April 30, 2019.
This case went to decision
Los Angeles Unified School District v. Student: Los Angeles Unified may not implement its August 2018 IEP without parent consent; ALJ finds three procedural violations. (2019)
Summary
After a telephonic prehearing conference, OAH ruled on Los Angeles' timely motion to continue its own due process hearing because of witness unavailability. Parent objected that a continuance would further delay a decision. The ALJ found good cause for reasons stated on the record, noting the district sought only a brief continuance on a newly filed matter. All prior dates were vacated, with a new prehearing conference set for April 22, 2019 and hearing for April 30 through May 2, 2019 in Van Nuys.
Why it matters
Continuances are disfavored, but OAH may grant a short one for witness unavailability over a parent's objection, especially early in a newly filed case. Parties must notify or subpoena their witnesses, or the witness will not count as unavailable for a later continuance request.
Key authority cited
- 34 C.F.R. § 300.515(a), (c)
- Ed. Code § 56502, subd. (f)
- Ed. Code § 56505, subd. (f)(3)
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1020
- Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL OAH Case No. 2019030744
DISTRICT,
ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING
v. CONFERENCE AND GRANTING LOS
ANGELES’ REQUEST FOR
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT. CONTINUANCE
On April 8, 2019, a telephonic prehearing conference was held before Administrative Law Judge Cole Dalton, Office of Administrative Hearings. Patrick Balucan, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Los Angeles Unified District. Parent appeared on behalf of Student. The PHC was recorded.
Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:
1. Los Angeles’ Motion to Continue. On March 19, 2019, Los Angeles filed a
motion to continue the hearing based upon witness unavailability. Parent objected on the ground a continuance would further delay a hearing decision.
A due process hearing must be conducted and a decision rendered within 45 days of receipt of the due process notice unless an extension is granted for good cause. (34 C.F.R. § 300.515(a) & (c) (2006); Ed. Code, §§ 56502, subd. (f), 56505, subd. (f)(3); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1020.) As a result, continuances are disfavored. Good cause may include the unavailability of a party, counsel, or an essential witness due to death, illness or other excusable circumstances; substitution of an attorney when the substitution is required in the interests of justice; a party’s excused inability to obtain essential testimony or other material evidence despite diligent efforts; or another significant, unanticipated change in the status of the case as a result of which the case is not ready for hearing. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332(c).) OAH considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including the proximity of the hearing date; previous continuances or delays; the length of continuance requested; the availability of other means to address the problem giving rise to the request; prejudice to a party or witness as a result of a continuance; the impact of granting a continuance on other pending hearings; whether trial counsel is engaged in another trial; whether the parties have stipulated to a continuance; whether the interests of justice are served by the continuance;
and any other relevant fact or circumstance. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332(d).)
Los Angeles has shown good cause for the continuance for reasons stated on the record. Los Angeles seeks a brief continuance on a newly filed matter. Los Angeles’ motion was timely filed and is granted.
All previous dates are vacated. Dates are reset as follows:
Prehearing Conference: April 22, 2019, at 3:00 p.m.
Hearing: April 30, 2019, May 1, 2019, and May 2, 2019, continuing day to day, at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 a.m. the first day of hearing and at 9:00 a.m. all other days, unless otherwise ordered.
The hearing shall take place at OAH offices located at 15350 Sherman Way, Suite 300, Van Nuys, CA 91406.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify.
A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.
All other matters shall be discussed at the continued prehearing conference.
2. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue working together
to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.
IF A FULL AND FINAL WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS REACHED
AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A
VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035. THE
PARTIES SHOULD ALSO LEAVE CONTACT INFORMATION SUCH AS CELLULAR
PHONE NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY. THE
PARTIES SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY EMAIL THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE
SIGNED AGREEMENT OR A LETTER WITHDRAWING THE CASE TO THE OAH AT
https://www.applications.dgsapps.dgs.ca.gov/oah/oahsftweb .
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: April 08, 2019
COLE DALTON
Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
