California OAH special education order · August 26, 2019
Order Following Prehearing Conference
OAH Case No. 2019041141 · ALJ Adrienne L. Krikorian
OAH set a September 4, 2019 hearing on whether Upland may assess Student without consent, and moved the hearing to the SELPA offices only if Upland cannot provide a larger room at its own offices.
This case went to decision
Upland Unified School District v. Student: Upland Unified may reassess a 14-year-old student with ADHD without parental consent under its March 2019 assessment plan. (2019)
Summary
After a telephonic prehearing conference with a Spanish interpreter, OAH confirmed one issue: whether Upland may assess Student under its March 15, 2019 assessment plan without parental consent. Upland asked to move the hearing to the West End SELPA offices to get a larger, compliant room, and Parent objected because Upland's offices are closer to her home. The ALJ ordered Upland to make reasonable efforts to provide a larger compliant room at its own offices, with the SELPA as the fallback location. Student's pending stay put motion will be decided in a separate order, and Upland's request for official notice of a prior OAH decision was deferred to the hearing.
Why it matters
A parent's objection to a farther hearing location can lead the ALJ to require the district to first try to accommodate the hearing at the closer site. Self-represented parents get an OAH-provided interpreter and may audio-record the hearing under set conditions.
Key authority cited
- Ed. Code, § 56505, subd. (e)(7)
- Ed. Code, § 56505.1, subd. (h)
- Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g)
- Gov. Code, § 11515
People named in the order
- Jonathon Read, Attorney for Upland Unified School District
- Giovanna Wormsbecker, Spanish interpreter
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE MATTER OF:
UPLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
v.
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT.
OAH CASE NUMBER 2019041141
ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING CONFERENCE
On August 26, 2019, Administrative Law Judge Adrienne L. Krikorian, Office of Administrative Hearings, held a telephonic prehearing conference, referred to as PHC.
The Administrative Law Judge will be referred to as an ALJ. The Office of Administrative Hearings will be referred to as OAH. Prehearing Conference is referred to as PHC.
Jonathon Read, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Upland Unified School District. Mother represented Student. Giovanna Wormsbecker interpreted the PHC from English to Spanish and from Spanish to English. The PHC was recorded. Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order.
HEARING DATES, TIMES, AND LOCATION
DUE PROCESS HEARING
The hearing will take place on September 4 and 5, 2019, and continue day to day at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin at 10:00 AM on the first day of the hearing and at 9:30 AM on all other days, unless otherwise ordered.
HEARING LOCATION
Upland moved to change the location of the hearing from 390 N. Euclid Avenue, Upland, California 91786 to the West End Special Education Local Plan Area, referred to as SELPA, located at 8265 Aspen Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91370. The basis for the request was to provide a compliant and larger hearing room than what was available at Upland’s offices. Parents’ home is approximately five miles from Upland’s offices. The SELPA offices are located approximately nine miles from Parent’s home, and approximately five and one half miles from Upland’s offices. Parent objected on the ground that Upland’s offices were closer to her home.
District facilities shall fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), and all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities. Districts are required to file written certification with OAH that the facilities District provides comply with these laws.
Upland filed the required certification as to the original location identified for hearing.
The ALJ took the matter under submission, and ordered Upland’s attorney to make reasonable efforts to provide a larger hearing room at Upland’s offices that are compliant.
If Upland cannot provide a larger hearing room at 390 N. Euclid Avenue, Upland California, the hearing will take place at the West End Special Education Local Plan Area, located at 8265 Aspen Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91784. Upland shall notify OAH and Parents of the final location for the hearing no later than 3:00 p.m. on August 28, 2019. Upland shall also file a certificate of compliance with OAH, certifying that the new hearing location, if applicable, is compliant by 4:00 p.m. on August 29, 2019.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify. A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing good cause to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.
Before the beginning of the hearing, Upland shall ensure that the hearing room is configured into a courtroom setting and shall contain:
• a table for Student and his representatives;
• a table for Upland’s legal representative and special education
representative;
• a table for the witness;
• a table for the ALJ, near an electrical outlet with a chair that adjusts to an
appropriate height for typing at the table provided; and
• water and tissue available for the participants.
The same hearing room shall be used for each day of hearing and shall be available at least one hour before the beginning of the hearing each day. The hearing room shall be locked following the hearing each night. Upland shall ensure that the hearing room and access to it are in compliance with all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.
Upland has agreed to set aside one parking space on each hearing day for each of the following: the ALJ, the interpreter, Parent, Upland’s attorneys, and witnesses.
ISSUE AND PROPOSED RESOLUTION
The issue at the due process hearing, and proposed resolution, as alleged in the complaint and confirmed by the parties and the ALJ during the prehearing conference are:
ISSUE
Is Upland entitled to conduct the assessments proposed in the March 15, 2019 assessment plan without parental consent?
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
Upland seeks an order permitting it to assess Student in accordance with the March 15, 2019 assessment plan without parental consent.
EXHIBITS
BINDERS
Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring binders before the hearing.
Exhibit binders shall include a tab for each exhibit. Each binder shall contain a detailed table of contents which clearly identifies the tabs and documents. The ALJ and witnesses must be able to easily turn to exhibit tabs and to turn pages in the binders.
Multiple binders may be submitted if necessary.
TAB AND PAGE NUMBERS
The parties shall place a letter followed by a number on each tab to identify each exhibit. Student shall use the letter S before the number to identify Student’s exhibits.
Upland shall use the letter D before the number to identify Upland’s exhibits. For example, S-1 means Student’s exhibit tab 1 and D-1 means Upland’s exhibit tab 1. Each page of each binder shall be numbered consecutively from the first page of the first exhibit to the last page of the last exhibit in the binder. Parties may use a Bates-stamp type system for numbering.
CONTENT
Each exhibit shall consist of one document. Separate documents may not be combined into one exhibit. Emails or letters may be consolidated into one exhibit if they are part of a single chain of messages. Exhibits in the binders should be in chronological order.
Parties should include resumes or curriculum vitae for each witness who is expected to testify as to their professional credentials. Notwithstanding the requirements of Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7), the parties shall exchange resumes not later than twenty-four hours before the witness is scheduled to testify.
Upland’s binder shall include a color copy of the school calendar for each school year in question and shall have witnesses available to explain the calendar if necessary.
COPIES OF BINDERS
The parties shall serve copies of their evidence binders on each other. This exchange is required by Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). Each party shall bring two additional sets of the binders containing their exhibits to the hearing.
One set will be used by the ALJ, and the other set will be used by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH before the hearing.
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not timely exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
WITNESSES
Parties are responsible for producing their own witnesses unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ. Parties shall make witnesses under their control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony. Education Code, section 56505.1, subd. (h), empowers the ALJ to set a reasonable limit on the length of the hearing after consideration of four factors. The first two factors are the issues to be heard and the complexity of facts to be proven. The second two factors are the ability of the parties or their representatives to present their respective cases and the parties’ estimates of the time needed to present their cases.
MEET AND CONFER
The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness and exhibit lists before the hearing. Evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear. The parties agreed to and shall meet and confer on August 27, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall discuss the availability of witnesses, the order of witnesses and the length of witness testimony.
The parties should attempt to eliminate duplicate exhibits from their binders. The parties may combine exhibits into one notebook if practical. The parties may discuss whether they can produce a written stipulation stating basic facts to shorten the length of time needed for the hearing.
EVIDENCE PRESENTATION
In an administrative proceeding, the burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49, 62.) In this case Upland requested the hearing and Upland’s case-in-chief shall be presented first, followed by Student.
WITNESS LISTS
The parties shall give the ALJ a joint proposed witness list for the first day of hearing. The list should include dates and time estimates of expected testimony. The proposed schedule should take into consideration breaks and lunch. In the event an agreement cannot be reached, each party shall prepare a separate written list. Upland shall have witnesses available in case there is no agreement. Before the hearing begins, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for direct and cross- examination of each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses. The ALJ will finalize the witness schedule. Parties shall be prepared at the end of each day to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the estimated time the testimony each witness is expected to take.
SCOPE OF WITNESS EXAMINATION
Each witness shall be called to testify only once, except for rebuttal purposes. All parties shall examine witness on all issues when the witness is first called. Requiring a witness to appear only once takes precedence over the order in which parties presents their case in chief.
TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY
Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall request for leave to do so before the hearing, unless the opposing party has stipulated that the witness may appear by telephone. The party offering the witness shall provide the witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties before the hearing. The binders must be exact paper copies of all of each party’s exhibits. Electronic copies are not acceptable. The party presenting the witness shall ensure the witness testifies from a private location with no other persons present. The party offering telephonic testimony shall ensure that the witness has telephone equipment that allows clear testimony at a volume that allows clear transmission of what the witness is saying, allows the witness’ testimony to make a clear recording, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. Upland shall ensure that the hearing room has telephone speaker equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all these requirements have been fulfilled.
ELECTRONIC RECORDINGS
Audio Recording A party may request permission to make an audio recording of the hearing.
Permission to make an audio recording is subject to the ALJ’s discretion and based upon certain conditions. Such requests are routinely granted on the following conditions:
• the OAH recording is the only official recording;
• the parties shall turn the recording device on and off at the same time
that the ALJ is on and off the record to avoid recording conversations while off the record;
• the recording device will be removed by the party recording during any
recess where the party leaves the room;
• operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay
the hearing;
• a parties’ recording may not be used to prepare the testimony of a witness
in the hearing;
• the recording shall not be shared with any non-party, possible witness, or
through social media;
• the parties shall not use the recording in any subsequent due process
hearing;
• the recording is subject to the same confidentiality as the due process
hearing; and
• the parties shall dispose of the unofficial recording when the time for filing
an appeal has passed or, in the event of an appeal, when the time for submission of the record on appeal has passed.
Student requested to record the hearing. Both parties may record the hearing, subject to these conditions.
Video Recording No party, witness or anyone else may make any video recording of any part of the proceedings. Any person doing so shall be subject to sanctions.
Recordings as exhibits Excerpts of an audio record of an individualized education program team meeting must be transcribed and offered as documentary evidence. The portion of the audio record transcribed shall be provided to the opposing party with the transcript to allow an opportunity to verify the accuracy of the transcription. Transcription need not be done by a certified court reporter. Electronic recording of the excerpts of the audio record shall be included with the transcript, at the ALJ’s discretion, to allow the ALJ to listen to the recording as well as read the transcript.
MOTIONS
Student filed a stay put motion on August 21, 2019. Student seeks stay put based upon a 2014 individualized education program. A separate order will be issued ruling on the motion.
Upland requested that the ALJ take official notice, pursuant to Government Code section 11515, of the Decision issued in OAH Case Number 2018120181. Upland’s request is taken under submission. The ALJ will rule on the request at hearing based upon the relevance of the prior Decision.
No other prehearing motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion that was not filed three business days before the Prehearing Conference, shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause why the motion was not timely filed.
STIPULATIONS
Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in writing.
CONDUCT OF COUNSEL AND HEARING ROOM DECORUM
Counsel, all parties, and all witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times. Cellular phones, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless the ALJ grants permission otherwise. No one shall engage in text messaging while the hearing is on the record. No food or drinks other than water will be permitted in the hearing room during the hearing.
LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
A Spanish language interpreter is required. OAH will provide the interpreter.
A party or participant to this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in a mediation or hearing may contact OAH at (916) 263- 0880, or send an email to OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov as soon as the need is known. The e- mail should have “Request for Accommodation” in the Subject Line. Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OAH/Services/Page-Content/Office-of- Administrative-Hearings-Services-List-Folder/Accommodations-at-OAH.
HEARING OPEN OR CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC
The hearing is closed to the public. Special Education hearings are closed to the public unless Student requests the hearing to be open to the public.
SETTLEMENT
The parties are encouraged to continue working together to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately if they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing.
In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880. At the same time, the parties should send the signature page of the signed agreement or a letter withdrawing the case to OAH at https://www.applications.dgs.ca.gov/oah/oahsftweb.
If a full and final written settlement agreement is reached after 4:00 p.m. the day prior to hearing, the parties shall leave a voicemail message regarding the settlement at (916) 274-6035. The parties should also leave contact information such as cellular phone numbers of each party or counsel for each party.
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages before the hearing.
If the matter settles subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement, the parties shall provide the date of the next board meeting. The hearing dates will not be cancelled without this information.
FAILURE TO COMPLY
The failure to comply with this Order may result in the exclusion of evidence or other sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 26, 2019 Adrienne L. Krikorian Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
