California OAH special education order · July 1, 2019
Order Following Prehearing Conference for Expedited Hearing
OAH Case No. 2019060591 · ALJ Rommel P. Cruz
OAH set an expedited hearing on whether Empire Springs Charter illegally expelled Student, and dismissed Student's charter-school statute claim as outside OAH's jurisdiction without objection.
This case went to decision
Student v. Empire Springs Charter School: Empire Springs Charter School did not expel student by disenrolling him for skipping mandatory annual testing; all relief denied. (2019)
Summary
After a prehearing conference with Parents and Empire Springs Charter School, OAH set a three-day expedited hearing for July 9 to 11, 2019. The single issue is whether the charter school expelled Student in violation of 20 U.S.C. section 1415(k) and Education Code section 48900. OAH dismissed Student's claim under Education Code section 47605(b)(5)(J)(iii) as outside its jurisdiction, and neither party objected. The order also set rules for exhibits, witnesses, recording, and a public hearing, which Student requested.
Why it matters
Parents challenging a charter school's removal of a child should frame their claims under the IDEA's discipline protections. OAH will not hear claims that rest only on the charter school statute's suspension and expulsion procedures.
Key authority cited
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(k)
- Ed. Code § 48900
- Ed. Code § 47605(b)(5)(J)(iii)
- M.C. v. Antelope Valley Unified School Dist. (9th Cir. 2017) 858 F.3d 1189
- Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49
- Ed. Code § 56505.1(h)
People named in the order
- Kathy Cox, Ph.D., Special education director, Empire Springs Charter School
- Robert Hennings, Assistant superintendent, Empire Springs Charter School
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE MATTER OF:
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT,
v.
EMPIRE SPRINGS CHARTER SCHOOL.
OAH CASE NUMBER 2019060591
ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING CONFERENCE FOR EXPEDITED
HEARING
On July 1, 2019, Administrative Law Judge Rommel P. Cruz, Office of Administrative Hearings, held a telephonic prehearing conference. The Administrative Law Judge will be referred to as an ALJ. The Office of Administrative Hearings will be referred to as OAH.
Mother and Father, appeared on behalf of Student. Attorney Jim Sanft appeared on behalf of Empire Springs Charter School. Special education director, Kathy Cox, Ph.D., and assistant superintendent, Robert Hennings, appeared on behalf of Empire Springs Charter. The PHC was recorded. Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:
HEARING DATES, TIMES, AND LOCATION
DUE PROCESS HEARING
The hearing will take place on July 9, 10, and 11, 2019, and continue day to day at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 AM on the first day of the hearing and at 9:00 AM on all other days, unless otherwise ordered.
HEARING LOCATION
The hearing will be held at 8968 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify. A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing good cause to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.
School district facilities shall fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), and all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities. School districts are required to file written certification with OAH that the facilities the school district provides comply with these laws.
Empire Springs Charter filed the required certification. Empire Springs Charter shall notify OAH within three business days of the date of this Order if it is unable to provide facilities that comply with the laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.
Before the beginning of the hearing, Empire Springs Charter shall ensure that the hearing room is configured into a courtroom setting and shall contain:
• a table for Student and his representatives;
• a table for Empire Springs Charter’s legal representative and special
education representative;
• a table for the witness;
• a table for the ALJ, near an electrical outlet with a chair that adjusts to an
appropriate height for typing at the table provided; and
• water and tissue available for the participants.
The same hearing room shall be used for each day of hearing and shall be available at least one hour before the beginning of the hearing each day. The hearing room shall be locked following the hearing each night. Empire Springs Charter shall ensure that the hearing room and access to it are in compliance with the all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.
Empire Springs Charter shall also provide a meeting room for Student’s representatives to be available a half hour prior to the start of the hearing, during hearing breaks, and during the lunch break.
Empire Springs Charter shall also ensure that one parking space is available on each hearing day for each of the following: the ALJ, Parents, Empire Springs Charter’s attorneys, and witnesses.
ISSUES AND PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS
The issues at the due process hearing, and proposed resolutions, as alleged in the complaint and clarified by the parties and the ALJ during the prehearing conference are:
ISSUES
1. Did Empire Springs Charter expel Student in violation of 20 United States
Code section 1415(k) and Education Code section 48900? Student’s claim regarding Empire Springs Charter’s alleged violation of Education Code section 47605(b)(5)(J)(iii) is dismissed as outside OAH’s jurisdiction. Neither party objected.
PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS
Student seeks an order compelling Empire Springs Charter not to dis-enroll Student and to hold a manifestation determination review meeting. Student further requests that Empire Springs Charter be ordered to complete its assessments of Student and to convene an individualized education program team meeting to determine his eligibility for special education and related services.
Empire Springs Charter filed its response to Student’s complaint on June 24,
2019. (M.C. v. Antelope Valley Unified School Dist. (9th Cir. 2017) 858 F.3d 1189, 1199-
1200.)
EXHIBITS
BINDERS
Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring binders before the hearing.
Exhibit binders shall include a tab for each exhibit. Each binder shall contain a detailed table of contents which clearly identifies the tabs and documents. The ALJ and witnesses must be able to easily turn to exhibit tabs and to turn pages in the binders.
Multiple binders may be submitted if necessary.
TAB AND PAGE NUMBERS
The parties shall place a letter followed by a number on each tab to identify each exhibit. Student shall use the letter S before the number to identify Student’s exhibits.
Empire Springs Charter shall use the letter D before the number to identify Empire Springs Charter’s exhibits. For example, S-1 means Student’s exhibit tab 1 and D-1 means Empire Springs Charter’s exhibit tab 1. Each page of each binder shall be numbered consecutively from the first page of the first exhibit to the last page of the last exhibit in the binder. Parties may use a Bates-stamp type system for numbering.
CONTENT
Each exhibit shall consist of one document. Separate documents may not be combined into one exhibit. Emails or letters may be consolidated into one exhibit if they are part of a single chain of messages. Documents offered as evidence to support a request for reimbursement must be separated by vendor and should be internally chronological where possible. Exhibits in the binders should be in chronological order.
Parties should include resumes or curriculum vitae for each witness who is expected to testify as to their professional credentials. Notwithstanding the requirements of Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7), the parties shall exchange resumes not later than 24 hours before the witness is scheduled to testify.
Empire Springs Charter’s binder shall include a color copy of the school calendar for each school year in question and shall have witnesses available to explain the calendar if necessary.
COPIES OF BINDERS
The parties shall serve copies of their evidence binders on each other no later than July 1, 2019, taking into account the Fourth of July federal and state holiday.
This exchange is required by Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). Each party shall bring two additional sets of the binders containing their exhibits to the hearing. One set will be used by the ALJ, and the other set will be used by witnesses.
The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH before the hearing.
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not timely exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
WITNESSES
Each party is responsible for producing their own witnesses unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ. Each party shall make witnesses under their control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony. Education Code, section 56505.1, subd. (h), empowers the ALJ to set a reasonable limit on the length of the hearing after consideration of four factors. The first two factors are the issues to be heard and the complexity of facts to be proven. The second two factors are the ability of the parties or their representatives to present their respective cases and the parties’ estimates of the time needed to present their cases.
MEET AND CONFER
The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness and exhibit lists before the hearing. Evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear. The parties are ordered to meet and confer no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 5, 2019. The parties shall discuss the availability of witnesses, the order of witnesses and the length of witness testimony.
The parties should attempt to eliminate duplicate exhibits from their binders and to review the legibility and completeness of exhibits. The parties may discuss whether they can produce a written stipulation stating basic facts to shorten the length of time needed for the hearing.
EVIDENCE PRESENTATION
In an administrative proceeding, the burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49, 62.) In this case Student requested the hearing and shall present his case-in-chief first, followed by Empire Springs Charter.
WITNESS LISTS
On the first day of hearing, before the first witness testifies, the parties shall provide the ALJ with a joint proposed witness list, with a detailed hour-by-hour schedule of all witnesses expected to testify at the hearing. The list shall also include an estimate of time for each party’s direct and cross-examination. In the event an agreement cannot be reached, each party shall prepare a separate written list. Empire Springs Charter shall have witnesses available in case there is no agreement. Before the hearing begins, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for direct and cross- examination of each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses. The ALJ will finalize the witness schedule. Parties shall be prepared at the end of each day to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the estimated time the testimony each witness is expected to take.
SCOPE OF WITNESS EXAMINATION
Each witness shall be called to testify only once, except for rebuttal purposes. All parties shall examine witness on all issues when the witness is first called. Requiring a witness to appear only once takes precedence over the order in which a party presents their case in chief.
TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY
Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall request for leave to do so before the hearing, unless the opposing party has stipulated that the witness may appear by telephone. The party offering the witness shall provide the witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties before the hearing. The binders must be exact paper copies of all of each party’s exhibits. Electronic copies are not acceptable. The party presenting the witness shall ensure the witness testifies from a private location with no other persons present. The party offering telephonic testimony shall ensure that the witness has telephone equipment that allows clear testimony at a volume that allows clear transmission of what the witness is saying, allows the witness’ testimony to make a clear recording, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. Empire Springs Charter shall ensure that the hearing room has telephone speaker equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all these requirements have been fulfilled.
ELECTRONIC RECORDINGS
Audio Recording Parties may make an audio recording of the hearing, subject to the following conditions:
• the OAH recording is the only official recording;
• the parties shall turn the recording device on and off at the same time
that the ALJ is on and off the record to avoid recording conversations while off the record;
• the recording device will be removed by the party recording during any
recess where the party leaves the room;
• operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay
the hearing;
• a parties’ recording may not be used to prepare the testimony of a witness
in the hearing;
• the recording shall not be shared with any non-party, possible witness, or
through social media;
• The parties shall not use the recording in any subsequent due process
hearing;
• the recording is subject to the same confidentiality as the due process
hearing; and
• the parties shall dispose of the unofficial recording when the time for filing
an appeal has passed or, in the event of an appeal, when the time for submission of the record on appeal has passed.
Video Recording No party, witness or anyone else may make any video recording of any part of the proceedings. Any person doing so shall be subject to sanctions.
Recordings as Exhibits Excerpts of an audio record of an individualized education program team meeting must be transcribed and offered as documentary evidence. The portion of the audio record transcribed shall be provided to the opposing party with the transcript to allow an opportunity to verify the accuracy of the transcription. Transcription need not be done by a certified court reporter. Electronic recording of the excerpts of the audio record shall be included with the transcript, at the ALJ’s discretion, to allow the ALJ to listen to the recording as well as read the transcript.
COMPENSATORY EDUCATION OR REIMBURSEMENT
Any party seeking reimbursement for expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of the expenditures. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.
MOTIONS
No prehearing motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion that was not filed three business days before the July 1, 2019 Prehearing Conference, shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause why the motion was not timely filed.
STIPULATIONS
Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in writing.
CONDUCT OF COUNSEL AND HEARING ROOM DECORUM
Counsel, all parties, and all witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times. Cellular phones, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless the ALJ grants permission otherwise. No food or drinks other than water will be permitted in the hearing room during the hearing.
LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
Neither party indicated a need for any accommodations in this case. A party or participant to this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in a mediation or hearing may contact OAH at (916) 263-0880, or send an email to OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov as soon as the need is known. The e-mail should have “Request for Accommodation” in the Subject Line. Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at:
https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OAH/Services/Page-Content/Office-of-Administrative-Hearings- Services-List-Folder/Accommodations-at-OAH.
HEARING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
At Student’s request, the hearing will be open to the public. The parties should inform the ALJ if Student expects any group or members of the press to be present during the hearing. No one may record any part of the hearing, and all electronic devices must be off or silent in the hearing room unless permitted by the ALJ.
Parents should be aware that by opening the hearing, Empire Springs Charter employees who are not witnesses, or other people that Parents might not know, may attend the hearing. Any person disclosed on either party’s witness list, with the exception of Empire Springs Charter’s representative, will be excluded from the hearing until their testimony has been completed. The parties shall confer on July 5, 2019, as to the seating requirements for members of the public. The parties shall immediately notify each other and OAH if they are aware that there will be media attending the hearing.
Government Code section 11425.20 empowers the ALJ to order an open hearing to be closed or make other protective orders to the extent necessary or proper to ensure a fair hearing in the circumstances of the particular case. The ALJ may also exclude persons whose actions impede the orderly conduct of the hearing, restrict attendance because of the physical limitations of the hearing facility, or take other action to promote due process or the orderly conduct of the hearing. (Tit. 1, Cal. Code Regs., § 1030.)
SETTLEMENT
The parties are encouraged to continue working together to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately if they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing.
In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880. At the same time, the parties should send the signature page of the signed agreement or a letter withdrawing the case to OAH at https://www.applications.dgs.ca.gov/oah/oahsftweb.
If a full and final written settlement agreement is reached after 4:00 p.m. the day prior to hearing, the parties shall leave a voicemail message regarding the settlement at (916) 274-6035. The parties should also leave contact information such as cellular phone numbers of each party or counsel for each party.
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages before the hearing.
If the matter settles subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement, the parties shall provide the date of the next board meeting. The hearing dates will not be cancelled without this information.
FAILURE TO COMPLY
The failure to comply with this Order may result in the exclusion of evidence or other sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: July 1, 2019 Rommel P. Cruz Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
