California OAH special education order · December 11, 2019

Order Following Prehearing Conference; Denying Motion to Dismiss

OAH Case No. 2019080673 · ALJ Elsa H. Jones

OAH denied Long Beach Unified's motion to dismiss because it raised questions of fact and special education cases have no summary judgment procedure. OAH also set the issues and hearing for December 17-19, 2019.

This case went to decision

Student v. Long Beach Unified School District: Long Beach Unified must provide 131 compensatory hours and new assessments for failing to implement an IEP; other claims denied. (2020)

Summary

Long Beach Unified moved to dismiss Student's due process complaint, and Student opposed. At the prehearing conference, the ALJ denied the motion because it raised factual questions, and there is no summary judgment procedure in special education cases. The parties may still address the motion's issues through evidence and briefing at hearing. The order also clarified five issues for hearing: child find, assessment, the IEPs' adequacy, IEP implementation, and prior written notice. It set the hearing for December 17-19, 2019, at the district's office.

Why it matters

A district cannot use a motion to dismiss to end a case early when the claims turn on disputed facts. Those disputes must be decided at hearing on the evidence.

Key authority cited

  • Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49
  • M.C. v. Antelope Valley Unified School Dist. (9th Cir. 2017) 858 F.3d 1189
  • Ed. Code § 56505(e)(7)
  • Ed. Code § 56505.1(h)
  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082(g)

Topics

motion to dismiss summary judgment child find prehearing conference assessment prior written notice

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE MATTER OF:

PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT,

v.

LONG BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.

OAH CASE NUMBER 2019080673

ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING CONFERENCE; DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS

On December 9, 2019, Administrative Law Judge Elsa H. Jones, Office of Administrative Hearings, held a telephonic prehearing conference. The Administrative Law Judge is called an ALJ; the Office of Administrative Hearings is called OAH; and a prehearing conference is called a PHC.

Nader Nuru, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Student and Parent, who will be referred to collectively as Student. Debra K. Ferdman, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Long Beach Unified School District. The PHC was recorded. Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following Order:

HEARING DATES, TIMES, AND LOCATION

DUE PROCESS HEARING

The hearing will take place on December 17 through December 19, 2019, and shall continue day to day at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 AM on the first day and at 9:00 AM on all other days, unless otherwise ordered. At the request of Long Beach Unified’s counsel, the hearing days will end by no later than

5:00 PM.

HEARING LOCATION

The hearing will be held at Long Beach Unified’s office, located at 2221 Argonne Avenue, Long Beach, California 90815.

The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify. A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing good cause to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.

School district facilities shall fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), and all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities. OAH requires school districts to file written certification that the facilities provided comply with these laws.

Long Beach Unified filed the required certification. Long Beach Unified shall notify OAH within three business days of the date of this Order if it is unable to provide facilities that comply with the laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.

Before the beginning of the hearing, Long Beach Unified shall ensure that the hearing room is configured into a courtroom setting and shall contain:

• a table for Student and his representatives;

• a table for Long Beach Unified’s representatives;

• a table for the witness; and

• a table near an electrical outlet for the ALJ.

The same hearing room shall be used for each day of hearing and shall be available at least one hour before the beginning of the hearing each day. The hearing room shall be locked following the hearing each night. Long Beach Unified shall ensure that the hearing room and access to it are in compliance with the all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.

ISSUES AND PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS

The issues at the due process hearing, and proposed resolutions, as alleged in the complaint and clarified by the parties and the ALJ during the PHC are:

ISSUES

1. Did Long Beach Unified deny Student a free appropriate public education,

referred to as a FAPE, by failing to fulfill its child find obligations from August 16, 2017, to November 2, 2018?

2. Did Long Beach Unified deny Student a FAPE by failing to assess Student

in the area of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or by failing to appropriately assess Student in the area of emotional disturbance, from September 11, 2017, to August 16, 2019?

3. Did Long Beach Unified’s individualized education programs dated

November 2, 2018, and May 19, 2019, referred to as IEPs, deny Student a FAPE by:

a. Failing to address Student’s needs in the areas of behavior,

academics, counseling, and educationally-related mental health services;

b. Failing to provide tutoring and a one-to-one aide; and

c. Failing to provide an appropriate placement?

4. Did Long Beach Unified deny Student a FAPE by failing to implement the

accommodations and services in his IEPs of November 2, 2018, and May 29, 2019? By no later than 5:00 PM on December 10, 2019, Student is to file and serve a statement listing the specific services and accommodations that are the subject of this issue.

5. Did Long Beach Unified deny Student a FAPE by failing to provide prior

written notice with respect to Student’s change of placement in May 2019?

PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS

The resolutions requested by Student include: assessments in all areas of suspected disability; transportation services; an appropriate behavior support plan and behavior services; counseling services; and compensatory education provided by a nonpublic agency.

Long Beach Unified filed its response to Student’s complaint on August 29, 2019.

(M.C. v. Antelope Valley Unified School Dist. (9th Cir. 2017) 858 F.3d 1189, 1199-1200.)

EXHIBITS

BINDERS

Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring binders before the hearing.

Exhibit binders shall include a tab for each exhibit. Each binder shall contain a detailed table of contents which clearly identifies the tabs and documents. Binders should not be so full that the ALJ and witnesses cannot easily turn to the exhibit tabs and pages in the binders. Multiple binders may be submitted if necessary.

TAB AND PAGE NUMBERS

The parties must place a letter followed by a number on each tab to identify each exhibit. Student must use the letter S before the number to identify Student’s exhibits.

Long Beach Unified must use the letter D before the number to identify its exhibits. For example, S-1 means Student’s exhibit tab 1 and D-1 means Long Beach Unified’s exhibit tab 1. Parties may either number each page within each tabbed exhibit or number each page in the binder consecutively beginning with the first page of the first exhibit through the last page of the last exhibit. For example, if there are 100 total pages in the binder the first page of the first exhibit is 1 and the last page of the last exhibit in the binder is 100.

CONTENT

Each exhibit must consist of one document. Separate documents may not be combined into one exhibit. Emails or letters may be consolidated into one exhibit if they are part of a single chain of messages. Exhibits in the binders should be in chronological order.

Parties should include resumes or curriculum vitae for each witness who is expected to testify as an expert. Parties must exchange resumes not later than 24 hours before the witness is scheduled to testify and provide a copy to the ALJ before the witness testifies.

Long Beach Unified’s binder must include a color copy of the school calendar for each school year in question.

COPIES OF BINDERS

The parties must serve copies of their evidence binders on each other. This exchange is required by Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). Each party must bring two additional sets of their exhibit binders to the hearing. One set will be used by the ALJ, and the other set will be used by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH before the hearing.

Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not timely exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless the ALJ rules that it is admissible.

WITNESSES

Parties are responsible for producing their own witnesses unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ. Parties shall make witnesses under their control reasonably available. The parties must schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party will be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, and at the discretion of the ALJ.

The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony. Education Code, section 56505.1, subd. (h), empowers the ALJ to set a reasonable limit on the length of the hearing after consideration of four factors. The first two factors are the issues to be heard and the complexity of facts to be proven. The second two factors are the ability of the parties or their representatives to present their respective cases and the parties’ estimates of the time needed to present their cases.

MEET AND CONFER

The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness and exhibit lists before the hearing. Evidence may be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear. The parties are ordered to meet and confer no later than December 11, 2019, at 10:00 AM to discuss the availability of witnesses, the order of witnesses and the length of witness testimony. The parties should attempt to eliminate duplicate exhibits from their binders. The parties may discuss whether they can produce a written stipulation stating basic facts to shorten the length of time needed for the hearing.

EVIDENCE PRESENTATION

In an administrative proceeding, the burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49, 62.) In this case Student requested the hearing and bears the burden of proof. Student’s case-in-chief shall be presented first.

WITNESS LISTS

The parties must provide a joint proposed witness list to the ALJ on the first day of hearing. The list should include dates and time estimates of expected testimony. In the event an agreement cannot be reached, each party shall prepare a separate written list. Long Beach Unified must have witnesses available in case there is no agreement. At the beginning of the hearing, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for direct and cross-examination of each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses. The ALJ will finalize the witness schedule. Parties must be prepared at the end of each day to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the estimated time for the testimony each witness.

SCOPE OF WITNESS EXAMINATION

Each witness will be called to testify only once, except for rebuttal purposes. All parties must examine witness on all issues when the witness is first called. Requiring a witness to appear only once takes priority over the order in which parties present their case-in-chief.

TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY

Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall request permission to do so before the hearing. The party offering the witness must provide the witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties before the witness testifies. The binders must be exact paper copies of all of each party’s exhibits. Electronic copies are not acceptable. The party presenting the witness shall ensure the witness testifies from a private location with no other persons present. The party offering telephonic testimony shall ensure that the witness has telephone equipment that allows testimony at a volume that allows clear transmission of what the witness is saying, allows the witness’ testimony to make a clear recording, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all of these requirements have been fulfilled.

ELECTRONIC RECORDINGS

AUDIO RECORDING

A party may request permission to make an audio recording of the hearing.

Permission to make an audio recording is subject to the ALJ’s discretion and based upon certain conditions. The conditions are:

• the OAH recording is the only official recording;

• the parties shall turn the recording device on and off at the same time that

the ALJ is on and off the record to avoid recording conversations while off the record;

• the recording device will be removed by the party recording during any

recess where the party leaves the room;

• operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay

the hearing;

• a parties’ recording may not be given, provided or played to a witness, or

potential witness; and

• the recording is subject to the same confidentiality as the due process

hearing.

Neither party has made a request to audio record the hearing to date. If either party wants to record the hearing, the request must be made before the hearing.

VIDEO RECORDING

No party, witness or anyone else may make any video recording of any part of the proceedings.

COMPENSATORY EDUCATION OR REIMBURSEMENT

Any party seeking reimbursement for expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of the expenditures. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education. Documents offered as evidence to support a request for reimbursement must be separated by vendor.

MOTIONS

Long Beach Unified timely filed a Motion to Dismiss. Student opposed the motion. The ALJ heard argument on the motion at the PHC, and denied the motion on the grounds that the motion raised questions of fact, and there is no summary judgment procedure in special education cases. However, the parties may address the issues raised by the motion to dismiss during their presentation of evidence at hearing, and the parties may further brief the issues raised by the motion to dismiss.

No additional prehearing motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion that was not filed three business days before the PHC shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause why the motion was not timely filed.

STIPULATIONS

Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in writing.

CONDUCT OF COUNSEL AND HEARING ROOM DECORUM

Counsel, all parties, and all witnesses must conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times. Cellular phones must be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless the ALJ grants permission otherwise.

LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS

No party has requested language interpretation or translation services.

A party or participant to this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in a mediation or hearing may contact OAH at (916) 263- 0880, or send an email to OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov as soon as the need is known. The e- mail should have “Request for Accommodation” in the Subject Line. Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OAH/Services/Page-Content/Office-of-Administrative- Hearings-Services-List-Folder/Accommodations-at-OAH.

HEARING OPEN OR CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC

The hearing is closed to the public. Special Education hearings are closed to the public unless Student requests the hearing to be open to the public.

SETTLEMENT

The parties are encouraged to continue working together to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately if they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing.

In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880. At the same time, the parties should send the signature page of the signed agreement or a letter withdrawing the case to OAH at https://www.applications.dgs.ca.gov/oah/oahsftweb.

If a full and final written settlement agreement is reached after 4:00 p.m. the day prior to hearing, the parties shall leave a voicemail message regarding the settlement at (916) 274-6035. The parties should also leave contact information such as cellular phone numbers of each party or counsel for each party.

Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received and processed by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages before the hearing.

If the matter settles subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement, the parties shall provide the date of the next board meeting. The hearing dates will not be cancelled without this information.

FAILURE TO COMPLY

The failure to comply with this Order may result in the exclusion of evidence or other sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 11, 2019 Elsa H. Jones Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings