Order Following Prehearing Conference

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE MATTER OF:

PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT,

v.

LAS VIRGENES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.

OAH CASE NUMBER 2019100451

ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING CONFERENCE

On November 22, 2019, Administrative Law Judge Clifford H. Woosley, Office of Administrative Hearings, held a telephonic prehearing conference. The Administrative Law Judge is called an ALJ; the Office of Administrative Hearings is called OAH; and a prehearing conference is called a PHC.

Parent appeared on behalf of Student. Wesley B. Parsons, Attorneys at Law, appeared on behalf of Las Virgenes Unified School District. The PHC was recorded.

Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:

HEARING DATES, TIMES, AND LOCATION

DUE PROCESS HEARING

The hearing will take place on December 3, 4, and 5, 2019 and continue day to day at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 AM on the first day and at 9:00 AM on all other days, unless otherwise ordered. The parties anticipate it will take two days to complete the hearing. Additional hearing dates will be discussed with the ALJ on the first day of hearing.

HEARING LOCATION

The hearing will be held at Las Virgenes’ offices, located at 4111 N. Las Virgenes Road, Calabasas, CA 91302.

The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify. A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing good cause to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.

District facilities shall fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), and all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities. OAH requires Districts to file written certification that the facilities provided comply with these laws.

Las Virgenes filed the required certification. Las Virgenes shall notify OAH within three business days of the date of this Order if it is unable to provide facilities that comply with the laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.

Before the beginning of the hearing, Las Virgenes shall ensure that the hearing room is configured into a courtroom setting and shall contain:

• a table for Student and his representatives;

• a table for Las Virgenes’ legal representative and special education

representative;

• a table for the witness; and

• a table near an electrical outlet for the ALJ.

The same hearing room shall be used for each day of hearing and shall be available at least one hour before the beginning of the hearing each day. The hearing room shall be locked following the hearing each night. Las Virgenes shall ensure that the hearing room and access to it are in compliance with the all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.

ISSUES AND PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS

The issues at the due process hearing, and proposed resolutions, as alleged in the complaint and clarified by the parties and the ALJ during the PHC are:

ISSUES

1. Did Las Virgenes deny Student a free appropriate public education, called

a FAPE, during the 2019-2020 school year because Las Virgenes did not include the following special education eligibilities in Student’s individualized education program, called an IEP, at the August 28, 2019 and September 18, 2019, IEP team meetings:

a. Other health impairment;

b. Speech or language impairment;

c. Multiple disabilities; and/or

d. Specific learning disability?

2. Did Las Virgenes deny Student a FAPE, at the at the August 28, 2019 and

September 18, 2019 IEP team meetings, by failing to:

a. Consider the findings and implement the recommendations from

the August 21, 2019 Stein Psychological Associates independent educational evaluation report;

b. Implement the accommodations and services in Student's IEP;

and/or

c. Offer specialized academic instruction and other supports to

address Student's dyslexia, dysgraphia and dyscalculia?

3. Did Las Virgenes deny Student a FAPE, at the August 28, 2019 and

September 18, 2019 IEP team meetings, and in subsequent correspondence, by failing to:

a. Create classes at Lindero Canyon Middle School that offer Student

the proper learning environment and educational services, which are specifically designed for dyslexic students;

b. Provide Student with urgently needed educational interventions to

address his disabilities, including weekly after-school intervention by an educational therapist; and/or

c. Offer placement for extended school year at a non-public school

that specializes in dyslexia/language-based disabilities to compensate for 2019-2020 school year lack of FAPE?

PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS

The resolutions requested by Student include:

1. Adding eligibilities of other health impairment, speech and language

impairment, multiple disabilities, and specific learning disability to Student’s IEP.

2. Provide an appropriate learning environment, specialized academic

instruction and effective support services to address Student’s dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dyscalculia.

3. Las Virgenes’ creation of classes designed for dyslexic children, after-

school educational therapist intervention, one-on-one home instruction by a credentialed teacher; and extended school year at a non-public school that specialized in dyslexia.

Las Virgenes filed its response to Student’s complaint on November 14, 2019.

(M.C. v. Antelope Valley Unified School Dist. (9th Cir. 2017) 858 F.3d 1189, 1199-1200.)

EXHIBITS

BINDERS

Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring binders before the hearing.

Exhibit binders shall include a tab for each exhibit. Each binder shall contain a detailed table of contents which clearly identifies the tabs and documents. Binders should not be so full that the ALJ and witnesses cannot easily turn to the exhibit tabs and pages in the binders. Multiple binders may be submitted if necessary.

TAB AND PAGE NUMBERS

The parties must place a letter followed by a number on each tab to identify each exhibit. Student must use the letter S before the number to identify Student’s exhibits.

Las Virgenes must use the letter D before the number to identify Las Virgenes’ exhibits.

For example, S-1 means Student’s exhibit tab 1 and D-1 means Las Virgenes’ exhibit tab

1. Parties may either number each page within each tabbed exhibit or number each

page in the binder consecutively beginning with the first page of the first exhibit through the last page of the last exhibit. For example, if there are 100 total pages in the binder the first page of the first exhibit is 1 and the last page of the last exhibit in the binder is 100.

CONTENT

Each exhibit must consist of one document. Separate documents may not be combined into one exhibit. Emails or letters may be consolidated into one exhibit if they are part of a single chain of messages. Exhibits in the binders should be in chronological order.

Parties should include resumes or curriculum vitae for each witness who is expected to testify as an expert. Parties must exchange resumes not later than 24 hours before the witness is scheduled to testify and provide a copy to the ALJ before the witness testifies.

Las Virgenes’ binder must include a color copy of the school calendar for each school year in question.

COPIES OF BINDERS

The parties must serve copies of their evidence binders on each other by November 25, 2019. This exchange is required by Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). Each party must bring two additional sets of their exhibit binders to the hearing. One set will be used by the ALJ, and the other set will be used by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH before the hearing.

Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not timely exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless the ALJ rules that it is admissible.

WITNESSES

Parties are responsible for producing their own witnesses unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ. Parties shall make witnesses under their control reasonably available. The parties must schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party will be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, and at the discretion of the ALJ.

The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony. Education Code, section 56505.1, subd. (h), empowers the ALJ to set a reasonable limit on the length of the hearing after consideration of four factors. The first two factors are the issues to be heard and the complexity of facts to be proven. The second two factors are the ability of the parties or their representatives to present their respective cases and the parties’ estimates of the time needed to present their cases.

MEET AND CONFER

The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness and exhibit lists before the hearing. Evidence may be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear. The parties are ordered to meet and confer no later than November 26, 2019, at 5:00 PM, to discuss the availability of witnesses, the order of witnesses and the length of witness testimony. The parties should attempt to eliminate duplicate exhibits from their binders. The parties may discuss whether they can produce a written stipulation stating basic facts to shorten the length of time needed for the hearing.

EVIDENCE PRESENTATION

In an administrative proceeding, the burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49, 62.) In this case Student requested the hearing and bears the burden of proof. Student’s case-in-chief shall be presented first, followed by Las Virgenes.

WITNESS LISTS

The parties must provide a joint proposed witness list to the ALJ on the first day of hearing. The list should include dates and time estimates of expected testimony. In the event an agreement cannot be reached, each party shall prepare a separate written list. Las Virgenes must have witnesses available in case there is no agreement. At the beginning of the hearing, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for direct and cross-examination of each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses. The ALJ will finalize the witness schedule. Parties must be prepared at the end of each day to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the estimated time for the testimony each witness.

SCOPE OF WITNESS EXAMINATION

Each witness will be called to testify only once, except for rebuttal purposes. All parties must examine witness on all issues when the witness is first called. Requiring a witness to appear only once takes priority over the order in which parties present their case in chief.

TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY

Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall request permission to do so before the hearing. The party offering the witness must provide the witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties before the witness testifies. The binders must be exact paper copies of all of each party’s exhibits. Electronic copies are not acceptable. The party presenting the witness shall ensure the witness testifies from a private location with no other persons present. The party offering telephonic testimony shall ensure that the witness has telephone equipment that allows testimony at a volume that allows clear transmission of what the witness is saying, allows the witness’ testimony to make a clear recording, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. Las Virgenes shall ensure that the hearing room has telephone speaker equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all of these requirements have been fulfilled.

At the time of the prehearing conference, the parties did not know of a witness who needed to testify telephonically.

ELECTRONIC RECORDINGS

Audio Recording A party may request permission to make an audio recording of the hearing.

Permission to make an audio recording is subject to the ALJ’s discretion and based upon certain conditions. The conditions are:

• the OAH recording is the only official recording;

• the parties shall turn the recording device on and off at the same time that

the ALJ is on and off the record to avoid recording conversations while off the record;

• the recording device will be removed by the party recording during any

recess where the party leaves the room;

• operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay

the hearing;

• a parties’ recording may not be given, provided or played to a witness, or

potential witness; and

• the recording is subject to the same confidentiality as the due process

hearing.

The parties may audio record the hearing, subject to these conditions.

Video Recording No party, witness or anyone else may make any video recording of any part of the proceedings.

Recordings as exhibits Student proposes to introduce all or part of a recording of an individualized education program team meeting. The ALJ has discretion to admit or exclude evidence in the form of a recording. Any request to submit a recording shall be considered at the time of hearing. The ALJ may grant or deny the request, or grant the request subject to certain conditions. The party offering the recording must establish that all or a part of the recording is relevant. The ALJ may request a transcript of the portion of the recording requested or have the party offering the recording to provide an exact identifiable portion of the recording the party seeks to admit. The identities of any person speaking on the portion of the tape being introduced must be established. An ALJ may allow the opposing party to offer additional portions of a recording to establish the context, or to rebut, the recording.

COMPENSATORY EDUCATION OR REIMBURSEMENT

Any party seeking reimbursement for expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of the expenditures. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education. Documents offered as evidence to support a request for reimbursement must be separated by vendor.

MOTIONS

Las Virgenes moved to exclude four witnesses listed by Student, asserting that they were not involved in providing Student with a FAPE and are administrative in nature. Parents assert that the witnesses have relevant evidence regarding Student’s placement and services. The witnesses and rulings are as follows:

1. Angela Falk: Ms. Falk is the director of pupil services and, as such, is

allegedly not involved in the decision making of providing Student a FAPE.

However, in her prior position, she was involved with Student and is listed as a potential witness by Las Virgenes. If Parents ask Ms. Falk a question that Las Virgenes believes is irrelevant, objection can be made at hearing.

Motion to exclude is denied.

2. Eric Anholt: Mr. Anholt is principal of Student’s middle school and,

allegedly, did not attend Student’s IEP meetings and was not otherwise involved in providing FAPE to Student. Parents contend that they had direct interactions with Mr. Anholt regarding Student’s placement.

Accordingly, the question of relevance cannot be determined by motion but requires evidence that will be addressed when Mr. Anholt testifies at hearing. Motion to exclude is denied.

3 and 4: Linda Menges and Dan Stepenosky: Ms. Menges is the President of the Los Virgenes’ Board of Directors. Mr. Stepenosky is Las Virgenes’ district superintendent. Parents seek their testimony regarding the school board’s and district’s position and decisions regarding implementation of California, Ventura County, and federal laws and written guidelines. Las Virgenes argues that Ms. Menges and Mr. Stepenosky are administrative witnesses who had no involvement in the provision of a FAPE to Student.

If Parents present evidence at hearing that Ms. Menges or Mr. Stepenosky possess knowledge relevant to Las Virgenes’ provision of FAPE to Student, the ALJ would consider hearing their testimony. However, Parents have not demonstrated the relevance of their testimony. Therefore, the motion to exclude is granted as to both proposed witnesses.

No other prehearing motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion that was not filed three business days before the PHC, shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause why the motion was not timely filed.

STIPULATIONS

Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in writing.

CONDUCT OF COUNSEL AND HEARING ROOM DECORUM

Counsel, all parties, and all witnesses must conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times. Cellular phones must be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless the ALJ grants permission otherwise.

LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS

A party or participant to this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in a mediation or hearing may contact OAH at (916) 263- 0880, or send an email to OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov as soon as the need is known. The e- mail should have “Request for Accommodation” in the Subject Line. Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OAH/Services/Page-Content/Office-of-Administrative- Hearings-Services-List-Folder/Accommodations-at-OAH.

HEARING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

At Student’s request, the hearing will be open to the public. The parties, should inform the ALJ if Student expects any group or members of the press to be present during the hearing. No one may record any part of the hearing, and all electronic devices must be off or silent in the hearing room unless permitted by the ALJ.

Parents should be aware that by opening the hearing, District employees who are not witnesses, or other people that Parents might not know, may attend the hearing.

Persons disclosed on either party’s witness list, with the exception of District’s representative, will be excluded from the hearing until their testimony has been completed. The parties shall confer on November 26, 2019, as to the seating requirements for members of the public. The parties shall immediately notify each other and OAH if they are aware that there will be media attending the hearing.

Government Code, section 11425.20 empowers the ALJ to order an open hearing to be closed or make other protective orders to the extent necessary or proper to ensure a fair hearing in the circumstances of the particular case. The ALJ may also exclude persons whose actions impede the orderly conduct of the hearing, restrict attendance because of the physical limitations of the hearing facility, or take other action to promote due process or the orderly conduct of the hearing. (Tit. 1, Cal. Code Regs., § 1030.)

SETTLEMENT

The parties are encouraged to continue working together to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately if they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing.

In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880. At the same time, the parties should send the signature page of the signed agreement or a letter withdrawing the case to OAH at https://www.applications.dgs.ca.gov/oah/oahsftweb.

If a full and final written settlement agreement is reached after 4:00 p.m. the day prior to hearing, the parties shall leave a voicemail message regarding the settlement at (916) 274-6035. The parties should also leave contact information such as cellular phone numbers of each party or counsel for each party.

Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received and processed by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages before the hearing.

If the matter settles subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement, the parties shall provide the date of the next board meeting. The hearing dates will not be cancelled without this information.

FAILURE TO COMPLY

The failure to comply with this Order may result in the exclusion of evidence or other sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 22, 2019 Clifford H. Woosley Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings