California OAH special education order · December 30, 2019
Order Following December 30, 2019 Prehearing Conference Denying Request for Continuance
OAH Case No. 2019101075 · ALJ Rommel P. Cruz
OAH denied Parents' request to continue the District's due process hearing for a speech-language reassessment, because no assessment was underway or agreed to and Parents waited nearly two months to ask.
This case went to decision
Garvey School District v. Student: Garvey School District may exit a kindergartner from special education without parental consent after assessments showed he no longer qualified. (2020)
Summary
Garvey School District filed for due process seeking an order that it may exit Student from special education without parental consent. Parents asked to continue the hearing so Student could be reassessed in speech and language and so settlement talks could continue, and the District opposed. The ALJ denied the continuance. The requested assessment was not in progress and the District had not agreed to it, Parents gave no reason for waiting nearly two months to ask, and the District said it did not want a second mediation. The order set the hearing for January 7–9, 2020, framed the single issue, and arranged a Cantonese interpreter for Parents.
Why it matters
Continuances are disfavored, and a wish for an assessment the district has not agreed to is not good cause to delay a hearing. Parents who want a new assessment before hearing should ask for it early and get the district's agreement in writing.
Key authority cited
- 34 C.F.R. § 300.515(a), (c)
- Ed. Code, § 56502, subd. (f)
- Ed. Code, § 56505, subd. (f)(3)
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1020
- Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332(d)
- Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49
People named in the order
- Geoffrey Winterowd, Attorney for Garvey School District
- Dr. Laura McDonald, Ph.D., District witness (possible telephonic testimony)
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE MATTER OF:
GARVEY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
v.
PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT.
OAH CASE NUMBER 2019101075
ORDER FOLLOWING DECEMBER 30, 2019 PREHEARING CONFERENCE
DENYING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
On December 30, 2019, Administrative Law Judge Rommel P. Cruz, Office of Administrative Hearings, held a telephonic prehearing conference. The Administrative Law Judge is called an ALJ; the Office of Administrative Hearings is called OAH; and a prehearing conference is called a PHC.
Attorney Geoffrey Winterowd appeared on behalf of Garvey School District.
Father appeared on behalf of Student. Father was assisted by a certified Cantonese interpreter. The PHC was recorded. Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:
HEARING DATES, TIMES, AND LOCATION
CONTINUANCE
On December 24, 2019, Parents on behalf of Student filed with OAH a request to continue the due process hearing to allow for a reassessment of Student in the area of speech and language and for the parties to continue settlement negotiations. On December 27, 2019, Garvey School District filed an opposition to the request for continuance.
A due process hearing must be conducted and a decision rendered within 45 days of receipt of the due process notice unless an extension is granted for good cause. (34 C.F.R. § 300.515(a) & (c) (2006); Ed. Code, §§ 56502, subd. (f), 56505, subd.
(f)(3); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1020.) As a result, continuances are disfavored. OAH considers all relevant facts and circumstances in determining whether good cause exists to grant an extension. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332(d).)
The request for continuance is denied. The assessment Student seeks for Garvey School District to conduct is not in progress, nor has Garvey School District agreed to conduct such assessment. Delaying the hearing to allow for an assessment that has yet to be agreed upon by the parties does not constitute good cause. In addition, no explanation was provided by Student as to why Parents waited nearly two months from the date Garvey School District filed its request for a due process hearing to request a reassessment of Student. Furthermore, Garvey School District indicated during the PHC that it did not wish to participate in a second mediation.
DUE PROCESS HEARING
The hearing will take place on January 7, 8, and 9, 2020, and continue day to day at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 AM on the first day and at 9:00 AM on all other days, unless otherwise ordered.
HEARING LOCATION
The hearing will be held at Garvey School District’s offices located at 2730 Del Mar Avenue, Rosemead, CA 91770.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify. A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing good cause to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.
School district facilities shall fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), and all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities. School districts are required to file written certification with OAH that the facilities the school district provides comply with these laws.
Garvey School District filed the required certification. Garvey School District shall notify OAH within three business days of the date of this Order if it is unable to provide facilities that comply with the laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.
Before the beginning of the hearing, Garvey School District shall ensure that the hearing room is configured into a courtroom setting and shall contain:
• a table for Student and his representatives;
• a table for Garvey School District’s legal representative and special
education representative;
• a table for the witness; and
• a table near an electrical outlet for the ALJ.
The same hearing room shall be used for each day of hearing and shall be available at least one hour before the beginning of the hearing each day. The hearing room shall be locked following the hearing each night. Garvey School District shall ensure that the hearing room and access to it are in compliance with the all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.
ISSUE AND PROPOSED RESOLUTION
The issue at the due process hearing, and proposed resolution, as alleged in the complaint and clarified by the parties and the ALJ during the PHC are:
ISSUE
1. May Garvey School District exit Student from special education without
parental consent based on its determination at the September 18, 2019 individualized education program team meeting that Student was no longer an individual with exceptional needs?
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
Garvey School District seeks a finding that Student is not an individual with exceptional needs and requests an order that it may exit Student from special education without parental consent.
EXHIBITS
BINDERS
Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring binders before the hearing.
Exhibit binders shall include a tab for each exhibit. Each binder shall contain a detailed table of contents which clearly identifies the tabs and documents. Binders should not be so full that the ALJ and witnesses cannot easily turn to the exhibit tabs and pages in the binders. Multiple binders may be submitted if necessary.
TAB AND PAGE NUMBERS
The parties must place a letter followed by a number on each tab to identify each exhibit. Student must use the letter S before the number to identify Student’s exhibits.
Garvey School District must use the letter D before the number to identify Garvey School District’s exhibits. For example, S-1 means Student’s exhibit tab 1 and D-1 means Garvey School District’s exhibit tab 1. Parties may either number each page within each tabbed exhibit or number each page in the binder consecutively beginning with the first page of the first exhibit through the last page of the last exhibit. For example, if there are 100 total pages in the binder the first page of the first exhibit is 1 and the last page of the last exhibit in the binder is 100.
CONTENT
Each exhibit must consist of one document. Separate documents may not be combined into one exhibit. Emails or letters may be consolidated into one exhibit if they are part of a single chain of messages. Exhibits in the binders should be in chronological order.
Parties should include resumes or curriculum vitae for each witness who is expected to testify as an expert. Parties must exchange resumes not later than 24 hours before the witness is scheduled to testify and provide a copy to the ALJ before the witness testifies.
Garvey School District’s binder must include a color copy of the school calendar for each school year in question.
COPIES OF BINDERS
The parties must serve copies of their evidence binders on each other. This exchange is required by Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7), which provides that parties have the right to receive from the other parties, at least five business days before the hearing, a copy of all documents and a list of all witnesses the parties intend to present at the hearing. Each party must bring two additional sets of their exhibit binders to the hearing. One set will be used by the ALJ, and the other set will be used by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH before the hearing.
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not timely exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
WITNESSES
Parties are responsible for producing their own witnesses unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ. Parties shall make witnesses under their control reasonably available. The parties must schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party will be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony. Education Code, section 56505.1, subd. (h), empowers the ALJ to set a reasonable limit on the length of the hearing after consideration of four factors. The first two factors are the issues to be heard and the complexity of facts to be proven. The second two factors are the ability of the parties or their representatives to present their respective cases and the parties’ estimates of the time needed to present their cases.
MEET AND CONFER
The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness and exhibit lists before the hearing. Evidence may be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear. The parties are ordered to meet and confer no later than 5:00 PM on January 3, 2020, to discuss the availability of witnesses, the order of witnesses and the length of witness testimony. The parties should attempt to eliminate duplicate exhibits from their binders. The parties may discuss whether they can produce a written stipulation stating basic facts to shorten the length of time needed for the hearing.
EVIDENCE PRESENTATION
In an administrative proceeding, the burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49, 62.) Here, Garvey School District requested the hearing and bears the burden of proof. Garvey School District’s case-in-chief shall be presented first, followed by Student.
WITNESS LISTS
The parties must provide a joint proposed witness list to the ALJ on the first day of hearing. The list should include dates and time estimates of expected testimony. In the event an agreement cannot be reached, each party shall prepare a separate written list. Garvey School District must have witnesses available in case there is no agreement.
At the beginning of the hearing, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for direct and cross-examination of each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses. The ALJ will finalize the witness schedule. Parties must be prepared at the end of each day to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the estimated time for the testimony each witness.
SCOPE OF WITNESS EXAMINATION
Each witness will be called to testify only once, except for rebuttal purposes. All parties must examine witness on all issues when the witness is first called. Requiring a witness to appear only once takes priority over the order in which parties present their case in chief.
TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY
Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall request permission to do so before the hearing. The party offering the witness must provide the witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties before the witness testifies. The binders must be exact paper copies of all of each party’s exhibits. Electronic copies are not acceptable. The party presenting the witness shall ensure the witness testifies from a private location with no other persons present. The party offering telephonic testimony shall ensure that the witness has telephone equipment that allows testimony at a volume that allows clear transmission of what the witness is saying, allows the witness’ testimony to make a clear recording, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. Garvey School District shall ensure that the hearing room has telephone speaker equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all of these requirements have been fulfilled.
The witness shall be informed of the privacy and confidentiality rules pertaining to the information contained in the binders and of the proper procedure for disposal of the evidence binder following completion of the witness’ testimony.
ELECTRONIC RECORDINGS
Audio Recording The parties’ request to audio record the hearing is granted, subject to the following conditions:
• the OAH recording is the only official recording;
• the parties shall turn the recording device on and off at the same time that
the ALJ is on and off the record to avoid recording conversations while off the record;
• the recording device will be removed by the party recording during any
recess where the party leaves the room;
• operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay
the hearing;
• a parties’ recording may not be given, provided or played to a witness, or
potential witness; and
• the recording is subject to the same confidentiality as the due process
hearing.
Video Recording No party, witness or anyone else may make any video recording of any part of the proceedings.
Recordings as Exhibits The ALJ has discretion to admit or exclude evidence in the form of a recording.
Any request to submit a recording shall be considered at the time of hearing. The ALJ may grant or deny the request, or grant the request subject to certain conditions. The party offering the recording must establish that all or a part of the recording is relevant.
The ALJ may request a transcript of the portion of the recording requested or have the party offering the recording to provide an exact identifiable portion of the recording the party seeks to admit. The identities of any person speaking on the portion of the tape being introduced must be established. An ALJ may allow the opposing party to offer additional portions of a recording to establish the context, or to rebut, the recording.
COMPENSATORY EDUCATION OR REIMBURSEMENT
Any party seeking reimbursement for expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of the expenditures. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education. Documents offered as evidence to support a request for reimbursement must be separated by vendor.
MOTIONS
Garvey School District may file a motion for the telephonic testimony of Dr. Laura McDonald, Ph.D. No other prehearing motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion that was not filed three business days before the PHC, shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause why the motion was not timely filed.
STIPULATIONS
Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in writing.
CONDUCT OF COUNSEL AND HEARING ROOM DECORUM
Counsel, all parties, and all witnesses must conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times. Cellular phones must be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless the ALJ grants permission otherwise.
LANGUAGE INTERPRETER AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
A Cantonese language interpreter is required to assist Parents. OAH will provide the interpreter. No other accommodations were requested by the parties.
A party or participant to this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in a mediation or hearing may contact OAH at (916) 263- 0880, or send an email to OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov as soon as the need is known. The e- mail should have “Request for Accommodation” in the Subject Line. Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OAH/Services/Page-Content/Office-of-Administrative- Hearings-Services-List-Folder/Accommodations-at-OAH.
HEARING CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC
The hearing is closed to the public. Special Education hearings are closed to the public unless Student requests the hearing to be open to the public.
SETTLEMENT
The parties are encouraged to continue working together to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately if they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing.
In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880. At the same time, the parties should send the signature page of the signed agreement or a letter withdrawing the case to OAH at https://www.applications.dgs.ca.gov/oah/oahsftweb.
If a full and final written settlement agreement is reached after 4:00 p.m. the day prior to hearing, the parties shall leave a voicemail message regarding the settlement at (916) 274-6035. The parties should also leave contact information such as cellular phone numbers of each party or counsel for each party.
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received and processed by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages before the hearing.
If the matter settles subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement, the parties shall provide the date of the next board meeting. The hearing dates will not be cancelled without this information.
FAILURE TO COMPLY
The failure to comply with this Order may result in the exclusion of evidence or other sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 30, 2019 Rommel P. Cruz Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
