California OAH special education order · February 21, 2020

Order Following Prehearing Conference

OAH Case No. 2019120390 · ALJ Adrienne L. Krikorian

OAH denied Parent's motion to appoint a receiver over Long Beach Unified because OAH lacks that power. It also denied a 'Motion for Foreclosure' because OAH does not grant summary judgment.

This case went to decision

Long Beach Unified School District v. Student: Long Beach Unified's speech-language and occupational therapy assessments upheld; parent's request for publicly funded independent evaluations denied. (2020)

Summary

Long Beach Unified filed for due process to defend its speech and language and occupational therapy assessments against Parent's requests for independent educational evaluations at public expense. Before hearing, Parent, representing Student without a lawyer, filed a 'Motion for Foreclosure' asking OAH to dismiss the District's case. Parent also filed a motion asking OAH to appoint a receiver over the District's special education program under Code of Civil Procedure section 564. The ALJ denied both motions: OAH does not grant summary judgments, so both sides get to present facts at hearing, and OAH's jurisdiction is limited to claims about a specific student's identification, evaluation, placement, or FAPE, so it has no power to appoint a receiver. The order also set the issues, hearing dates, and procedures for the hearing.

Why it matters

OAH can only decide disputes about one student's IDEA rights, so requests for district-wide remedies such as a receivership must go elsewhere. A defense to a district's assessment case is made by presenting evidence at hearing, not through a summary dismissal motion.

Key authority cited

  • 20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(6)
  • Ed. Code, § 56501, subd. (a)
  • Code Civ. Proc., § 564
  • Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49
  • Ed. Code, § 56505.1, subd. (h)
  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g)

People named in the order

  • Debra Ferdman, Attorney for Long Beach Unified School District
  • Amy H. Larsen, Educational advocate (author of compliance complaint filed by Student)

Topics

receiver oah jurisdiction summary judgment independent educational evaluation self-represented parent assessment

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE MATTER OF:

LONG BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,

v.

PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT.

OAH CASE NUMBER 2019120390

ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING CONFERENCE

FEBRUARY 21, 2020

On February 21, 2020, Administrative Law Judge Adrienne L. Krikorian, Office of Administrative Hearings held a telephonic prehearing conference. The Administrative Law Judge is called an ALJ. The Office of Administrative hearings is called OAH. The prehearing conference is called a PHC. Attorney Debra Ferdman appeared on behalf of Long Beach Unified School District. Student’s father appeared on Student’s behalf. The PHC was recorded. Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order.

HEARING DATES, TIMES, AND LOCATION

DUE PROCESS HEARING

The hearing will take place on March 3, 4 and 5, 2020, and continue day to day at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 AM on the first day and at 9:00 AM on all other days, unless otherwise ordered. Additional hearing dates, if needed, will be discussed with the ALJ on the first day of hearing.

HEARING LOCATION

The hearing will be held at Benjamin F. Tucker Elementary, Bungalow 24, 2221 Argonne Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90815.

The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify. A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing good cause to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.

District facilities shall fully comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.), and all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities. OAH requires Districts to file written certification that the facilities provided comply with these laws.

Long Beach Unified filed the required certification. Long Beach Unified shall notify OAH within three business days of the date of this Order if it is unable to provide facilities that comply with the laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.

Before the beginning of the hearing, Long Beach Unified shall ensure that the hearing room is configured into a courtroom setting and shall contain:

• a table for Student and his representatives;

• a table for Long Beach Unified’s legal representative and special education

representative;

• a table for the witness; and

• a table near an electrical outlet for the ALJ.

The same hearing room shall be used for each day of hearing and shall be available at least one hour before the beginning of the hearing each day. The hearing room shall be locked following the hearing each night. Long Beach Unified shall ensure that the hearing room and access to it are in compliance with the all laws governing accessibility of government facilities to persons with disabilities.

ISSUES AND PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS

The issues at the due process hearing, and proposed resolutions, as alleged in the complaint and clarified by the parties and the ALJ during the PHC are:

ISSUES

1. Was Long Beach Unified’s October 17, 2019 speech and language

assessment appropriate and conducted in accordance with applicable law such that Student is not entitled to an independent educational evaluation in speech and language at public expense?

2. Was Long Beach Unified’s October 18, 2019 occupational therapy

assessment appropriate and conducted in accordance with applicable law such that Student is not entitled to an independent educational evaluation in occupational therapy at public expense?

PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS

The resolutions requested by Long Beach Unified are orders finding Long Beach appropriately conducted the assessments at issue such that Student is not entitled to an independent educational evaluation at public expense.

EXHIBITS

BINDERS

Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring binders before the hearing.

Exhibit binders shall include a tab for each exhibit. Each binder shall contain a detailed table of contents which clearly identifies the tabs and documents. Binders should not be so full that the ALJ and witnesses cannot easily turn to the exhibit tabs and pages in the binders. Multiple binders may be submitted if necessary.

TAB AND PAGE NUMBERS

The parties must place a letter followed by a number on each tab to identify each exhibit. Student must use the letter S before the number to identify Student’s exhibits.

Long Beach Unified must use the letter D before the number to identify Long Beach Unified’s exhibits. For example, S-1 means Student’s exhibit tab 1 and D-1 means Long Beach Unified’s exhibit tab 1. Parties may either number each page within each tabbed exhibit or number each page in the binder consecutively beginning with the first page of the first exhibit through the last page of the last exhibit. For example, if there are 100 total pages in the binder the first page of the first exhibit is 1 and the last page of the last exhibit in the binder is 100.

CONTENT

Each exhibit must consist of one document. Separate documents may not be combined into one exhibit. Emails or letters may be consolidated into one exhibit if they are part of a single chain of messages. Exhibits in the binders should be in chronological order.

Parties should include resumes or curriculum vitae for each witness who is expected to testify as an expert. Parties must exchange resumes not later than 24 hours before the witness is scheduled to testify and provide a copy to the ALJ before the witness testifies.

Long Beach Unified’s binder must include a color copy of the school calendar for each school year in question.

COPIES OF BINDERS

The parties must serve copies of their evidence binders on each other. This exchange is required by Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). Each party must bring two additional sets of their exhibit binders to the hearing. One set will be used by the ALJ, and the other set will be used by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH before the hearing.

Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not timely exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless the ALJ rules that it is admissible.

WITNESSES

Parties are responsible for producing their own witnesses unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ. Parties shall make witnesses under their control reasonably available. The parties must schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party will be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, and at the discretion of the ALJ.

The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony. Education Code, section 56505.1, subd. (h), empowers the ALJ to set a reasonable limit on the length of the hearing after consideration of four factors. The first two factors are the issues to be heard and the complexity of facts to be proven. The second two factors are the ability of the parties or their representatives to present their respective cases and the parties’ estimates of the time needed to present their cases.

MEET AND CONFER

The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness and exhibit lists before the hearing. Evidence may be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear. The parties are ordered to meet and confer no later than the close of business on February 27, 2020, to discuss the availability of witnesses, the order of witnesses and the length of witness testimony.

The parties should attempt to eliminate duplicate exhibits from their binders. The parties may discuss whether they can produce a written stipulation stating basic facts to shorten the length of time needed for the hearing.

EVIDENCE PRESENTATION

In an administrative proceeding, the burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49, 62.) In this case Long Beach Unified requested the hearing and bears the burden of proof. Long Beach Unified’s case-in-chief shall be presented first, followed by Student.

WITNESS LISTS

The parties must provide a joint proposed witness list to the ALJ on the first day of hearing. The list should include dates and time estimates of expected testimony. In the event an agreement cannot be reached, each party shall prepare a separate written list. Long Beach Unified must have witnesses available in case there is no agreement. At the beginning of the hearing, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for direct and cross-examination of each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses. The ALJ will finalize the witness schedule. Parties must be prepared at the end of each day to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the estimated time for the testimony each witness.

SCOPE OF WITNESS EXAMINATION

Each witness will be called to testify only once, except for rebuttal purposes. All parties must examine witness on all issues when the witness is first called. Requiring a witness to appear only once takes priority over the order in which parties present their case in chief.

TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY

Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall request permission to do so before the hearing. The party offering the witness must provide the witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties before the witness testifies. The binders must be exact paper copies of all of each party’s exhibits. Electronic copies are not acceptable. The party presenting the witness shall ensure the witness testifies from a private location with no other persons present. The party offering telephonic testimony shall ensure that the witness has telephone equipment that allows testimony at a volume that allows clear transmission of what the witness is saying, allows the witness’ testimony to make a clear recording, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. Long Beach Unified shall ensure that the hearing room has telephone speaker equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and allows the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all of these requirements have been fulfilled.

The ALJ will consider requests for telephonic testimony on the first day of hearing.

ELECTRONIC RECORDINGS

AUDIO RECORDING

A party may request permission to make an audio recording of the hearing.

Permission to make an audio recording is subject to the ALJ’s discretion and based upon certain conditions. The conditions are:

• the OAH recording is the only official recording;

• the parties shall turn the recording device on and off at the same time that

the ALJ is on and off the record to avoid recording conversations while off the record;

• the recording device will be removed by the party recording during any

recess where the party leaves the room;

• operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay

the hearing;

• a parties’ recording may not be given, provided or played to a witness, or

potential witness; and

• the recording is subject to the same confidentiality as the due process

hearing.

Both parties may record the hearing subject to these conditions.

VIDEO RECORDING

No party, witness or anyone else may make any video recording of any part of the proceedings.

RECORDINGS AS EXHIBITS

The ALJ has discretion to admit or exclude evidence in the form of a recording.

Any request to submit a recording shall be considered at the time of hearing. The ALJ may grant or deny the request, or grant the request subject to certain conditions. The party offering the recording must establish that all or a part of the recording is relevant.

The ALJ may request a transcript of the portion of the recording requested or have the party offering the recording to provide an exact identifiable portion of the recording the party seeks to admit. The identities of any person speaking on the portion of the tape being introduced must be established. An ALJ may allow the opposing party to offer additional portions of a recording to establish the context, or to rebut, the recording.

MOTIONS

On February 18, 2020, Student filed a number of communications with OAH, only some of which refer to service of those communications upon Long Beach Unified.

Student filed two motions with OAH:

1. Student filed a “Motion for Foreclosure” which is, essentially, a motion to

dismiss Long Beach Unified’s Due Process Complaint. Student contends in one sentence that Long Beach Unified “failed to follow procedural safeguards” under title 20 United States Code section 1415. OAH does not grant summary judgments, which is the essence of Student’s request. Both parties have the right to present facts at the hearing to develop a factual record, before the hearing ALJ can make rulings on the merits of Long Beach Unified’s complaint. Accordingly, the Motion for Foreclosure is denied.

2. Student also filed a Motion for Appointment of Receiver. Student makes

her motion pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 564 et seq., which she supports with a separate Memorandum in Support of Motion for Appointment of a Receiver. The motion seeks the appointment of a receiver to “protect equity in the education of all children with disabilities” at Long Beach Unified under title 5 California Code of Regulations and title 34 Code of Federal Regulations section 300 et. seq. This motion seeks actions by OAH over which it has no jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of OAH is limited to the adjudication of claims relating to a specific student arising under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Those claims are limited to any matter relating to “the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the child, or the provision of a free appropriate public education to such child.” (20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(6);

Ed. Code, § 56501, subd. (a).). OAH has no authority under Code of Civil Procedure section 564 to appoint a receiver for any purpose. Accordingly, the Motion for Appointment of Receiver is denied.

Student also filed several documents that did not seek action by OAH.

Accordingly, no action is taken on these documents. If Student seeks to offer any of these documents as evidence at hearing, Student must follow the procedures in this Order, including timely disclosure to and exchange with Long Beach Unified:

1. Student’s Timeline

2. Letter from Inspector General

3. Notice of District’s Refusal

4. Notice of District Reply

5. OAH Quarterly Statistics Report

6. OAH Quarterly Statistics Report 2016-2017

7. Commission on Teacher Credentialing Complaint

8. Request to Dismiss Compliance Complaint

9. Undated unsigned compliance complaint by educational advocate Amy H.

Larsen

10. Correspondence by OAH staff counsel to Parent

No other prehearing motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion that was not filed three business days before the PHC shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause why the motion was not timely filed.

STIPULATIONS

Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in writing.

CONDUCT OF COUNSEL AND HEARING ROOM DECORUM

Counsel, all parties, and all witnesses must conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times. Cellular phones must be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless the ALJ grants permission otherwise.

LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS

A party or participant to this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in a mediation or hearing may contact OAH at (916) 263- 0880, or send an email to OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov as soon as the need is known. The e- mail should have “Request for Accommodation” in the Subject Line. Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OAH/Services/Page-Content/Office-of-Administrative- Hearings-Services-List-Folder/Accommodations-at-OAH.

HEARING OPEN OR CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC

The hearing is closed to the public. Special Education hearings are closed to the public unless Student requests the hearing to be open to the public.

SETTLEMENT

The parties are encouraged to continue working together to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately if they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing.

In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880. At the same time, the parties should send the signature page of the signed agreement or a letter withdrawing the case to OAH at https://www.applications.dgs.ca.gov/oah/oahsftweb.

If a full and final written settlement agreement is reached after 4:00 p.m. the day prior to hearing, the parties shall leave a voicemail message regarding the settlement at (916) 274-6035. The parties should also leave contact information such as cellular phone numbers of each party or counsel for each party.

Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received and processed by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages before the hearing.

If the matter settles subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement, the parties shall provide the date of the next board meeting. The hearing dates will not be cancelled without this information.

FAILURE TO COMPLY

The failure to comply with this Order may result in the exclusion of evidence or other sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Adrienne L. Krikorian Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings