California OAH special education order · July 26, 2021

Order Following Prehearing Conference Granting Request for Continuance

OAH Case No. 2021070206 · ALJ Marlo Nisperos

OAH granted Parent's late, opposed request to continue the prehearing conference and hearing so Parent could seek counsel, after mail problems kept Parent from receiving case documents until the day of the conference.

This case went to decision

Victor Valley Union High School District v. Student: Victor Valley Union High School District may reassess a student without parental consent; its request to suspend services is denied. (2021)

Summary

At the prehearing conference, Parent asked to continue the prehearing conference and due process hearing in Victor Valley's case so Parent could look for a lawyer. Parent had not received OAH's documents until that day because of mail delivery problems. Victor Valley opposed, saying it was ready for hearing and had other hearings scheduled in August. The ALJ found good cause for both the late filing and the continuance and reset the prehearing conference to September 13, 2021 and the hearing to September 21-23, 2021. Any attorney Parent retains must be ready to proceed on those dates.

Why it matters

Parents served with a district-filed complaint can get a short continuance to find counsel when they show good cause, such as not receiving case papers in time, even over district objection. A newly retained attorney will be expected to proceed on the reset dates.

Key authority cited

  • 34 C.F.R. § 300.515(a) & (c)
  • Ed. Code, § 56502, subd. (f)
  • Ed. Code, § 56505, subd. (f)(3)
  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1020
  • Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332(c)-(d)

People named in the order

  • Rikesha Lane, Attorney for Victor Valley Union High School District
  • Marlo Nisperos, Administrative Law Judge

Topics

continuance good cause self-represented parent district-filed case right to counsel late motion

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE MATTER OF:

VICTOR VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT,

v.

PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT.

OAH CASE NUMBER 2021070206

ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING CONFERENCE

GRANTING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE

JULY 26, 2021

On July 26, 2021, Administrative Law Judge Marlo Nisperos, Office of Administrative Hearings held a telephonic prehearing conference. The Administrative Law Judge will be referred to as an ALJ. The prehearing conference will be referred to as a PHC. Rikesha Lane, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Victor Valley Union High School District. Parent appeared on behalf of Student. The PHC was recorded. Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:

HEARING DATES, TIMES, AND LOCATION

Parent moved to continue the prehearing conference and due process hearing to seek counsel. Additionally, Parent did not receive documents from OAH related to this matter until today based on mail delivery problems at their residence.

The motion was not filed three days before the PHC. Parent established good cause for filing the motion less than three days before this PHC. Victor Valley opposed the motion citing other due process hearings in which it is a party that are scheduled throughout August. Additionally, Victor Valley is prepared to proceed to hearing.

A due process hearing must be conducted and a decision rendered within 45 days of receipt of the due process notice unless an extension is granted for good cause. (34 C.F.R. § 300.515(a) & (c) (2006); Ed. Code, §§ 56502, subd. (f), 56505, subd.

(f)(3); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1020.) As a result, continuances are disfavored. Good cause may include the unavailability of a party, counsel, or an essential witness due to death, illness or other excusable circumstances; substitution of an attorney when the substitution is required in the interests of justice; a party’s excused inability to obtain essential testimony or other material evidence despite diligent efforts; or another significant, unanticipated change in the status of the case as a result of which the case is not ready for hearing. (Ed. Code, § 56505, subd. (f)(3); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332(c).)

OAH considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including the proximity of the hearing date; previous continuances or delays; the length of continuance requested; the availability of other means to address the problem giving rise to the request; prejudice to a party or witness as a result of a continuance; the impact of granting a continuance on other pending hearings; whether trial counsel is engaged in another trial; whether the parties have stipulated to a continuance; whether the interests of justice are served by the continuance or imposing conditions on the continuance; and any other relevant fact or circumstance. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332(d).)

The request for continuance is granted for good cause. Student is on notice that if counsel is retained, that attorney must be prepared to proceed to hearing on the currently scheduled hearing dates. All previously scheduled dates are vacated. The case shall proceed as follows:

Prehearing Conference: September 13, 2021 at 1:00 p.m.

All other prehearing matters shall be addressed at the September 13, 2021 prehearing conference. All prehearing motions must be filed three business days before the PHC.

Due Process Hearing: September 21, 2021, through September 23, 2021.

The hearing shall begin at 9:30 AM each day unless otherwise ordered. The hearing shall continue day to day at the discretion of the ALJ.

Hearing Location: Videoconference hearing using Microsoft Teams.

The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify. A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed.

SETTLEMENT

The parties shall immediately inform OAH in writing if they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. If the parties reach a settlement within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.

If a full and final written settlement agreement is reached after 5:00 PM the day before the hearing, the parties shall leave a voicemail message regarding the settlement at (916) 274-6035. The parties should also leave contact information such as cellular phone numbers of each party or counsel for each party. At the same time, the parties should send the signature page of the signed agreement or a letter withdrawing the case to OAH at https://www.applications.dgs.ca.gov/oah/oahsftweb.

Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages before the hearing.

If the matter settles subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement, the parties shall provide the date of the next board meeting. The hearing dates will not be cancelled without this information.

FAILURE TO COMPLY

Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of evidence or other sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Marlo Nisperos Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings