California OAH special education order · June 23, 2022
Order Granting Request for Reconsideration and Granting Joint Request to Reschedule Mediation and Continue Due Process Hearing
OAH Case No. 2022030988 · ALJ Clifford H. Woosley
OAH granted the parties' joint reconsideration motion and continued the hearing to August 30, 2022. Attorney declarations showed the earlier request was meant to reschedule mediation because of prepaid vacations and conflicting hearings.
Summary
OAH had denied the parties' joint request for mediation and a continuance because they had filed it on the form meant for an initial mediation date, and they already had a June 30 mediation set. Both sides then jointly moved for reconsideration, with attorney declarations and exhibits. The declarations explained that they meant to reschedule mediation and continue the hearing because of District counsel's prepaid vacation and Student's counsel's hearings in older cases. OAH found new facts and good cause, granted reconsideration, moved mediation to August 5, 2022, and set the hearing for August 30 through September 1, 2022.
Why it matters
Using the wrong OAH form or giving a bare request can get a continuance denied. A prompt reconsideration motion backed by declarations showing specific conflicts can fix the problem.
Key authority cited
- Gov. Code, § 11521
- Code Civ. Proc., § 1008
- Baldwin v. Home Savings of America (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 1192
- Ed. Code, § 56505, subd. (f)(3)
- 34 C.F.R. § 300.515
- Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332
People named in the order
- Summer D. Dalessandro, Attorney for Corona-Norco Unified School District
- Timothy A. Adams, Attorney for Student
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE MATTER OF:
PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT,
V.
CORONA-NORCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
OAH CASE NUMBER 2022030988
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
AND GRANTING JOINT REQUEST TO RESHEDULE
MEDIATION AND CONTINUE DUE PROCESS HEARING
JUNE 23, 2022
On June 17, 2022, the undersigned Administrative Law Judge issued an order denying the parties’ joint request for a videoconference mediation and continuance of due process hearing. On June 22, 2022, the parties filed a motion for reconsideration of their joint request for mediation and continuance of the due process hearing.
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
The Office of Administrative Hearings will generally reconsider a ruling upon a showing of new or different facts, circumstances, or law justifying reconsideration, when the party seeks reconsideration within a reasonable period of time, generally within ten days. (See, e.g., Gov. Code, § 11521; Code Civ. Proc., § 1008.) The party seeking reconsideration may also be required to provide an explanation for its failure to previously provide the different facts, circumstances or law. (See Baldwin v. Home Savings of America (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 1192, 1199-1200.)
The motion offers new facts, circumstances, or law. to support reconsideration.
The parties’ June 16, 2022, joint request to schedule mediation and continue hearing dates was made using the OAH form designated to be used when parties seek an initial mediation date, which requires a continuance of the hearing to accommodate the mediation. The request was denied because the parties have a June 30, 2022, mediation date, which predated the presently schedule hearing of July 6, and 7, 2022.
The parties intended their June 16, 2022, request to be a motion to reschedule the mediation and continue the hearing because of conflicts with hearings scheduled in other matters and with prepaid vacations. The parties’ motion for reconsideration is supported by the declarations of both parties’ attorneys and exhibits and establishes the parties’ intent to demonstrate good cause for their request.
The parties’ motion for reconsideration is granted.
MOTION TO RESCHEDULE MEDIATION AND CONTINUE HEARING
The parties seek to reschedule the mediation for August 5, 2022, and continue the hearing to August 30 to September 1, 2022.
A due process hearing must be conducted, and a decision rendered, within 45 days of receipt of the due process notice unless an extension is granted for good cause. (34 C.F.R. § 300.515(a) & (c) (2006); Ed. Code, §§ 56502, subd. (f), 56505, subd. (f)(3); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 1, § 1020.) As a result, continuances are disfavored.
Good cause may include the unavailability of a party, counsel, or an essential witness due to death, illness or other excusable circumstances; substitution of an attorney when the substitution is required in the interests of justice; a party’s excused inability to obtain essential testimony or other material evidence despite diligent efforts; or another significant, unanticipated change in the status of the case as a result of which the case is not ready for hearing. (Ed. Code, § 56505, subd. (f)(3); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332(c).)
OAH considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including the proximity of the hearing date; previous continuances or delays; the length of continuance requested; the availability of other means to address the problem giving rise to the request; prejudice to a party or witness as a result of a continuance. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332(d).)
Corona-Norco’s attorney Summer D. Dalessandro is scheduled to be on vacation from June 30 to July 12, 2022, with non-refundable airline tickets. Corona-Norco’s representative similarly has a conflicting scheduled vacation. Student’s attorney Timothy A. Adams has hearings in other older, due process matter on the same hearing dates in this matter. Attorney Adams is similarly schedule for hearings in older due process matter through August 25, 2022.
The parties have demonstrated good cause for continuance. In May 2022, the parties obtained a hearing continuance to August 2022. However, because of the Student’s amended complaint, Corona-Norco’s complaint, and the consolidation of the two matters, the parties now have a hearing scheduled for July 6 and 7, 2022. The July 2022 hearing dates conflict with previously scheduled, prepaid vacations and hearing dates. The parties have collaborated on agreeing to the proposed dates for the rescheduled mediation and continued hearing. The motion to continue is granted.
ORDER
1. The motion for reconsideration is granted.
2. Upon reconsideration, the parties’ joint motion to reschedule the mediation
and continue the hearing is granted.
3. The matter will be set as follows:
MEDIATION DATE is August 5, 2022, 9:00 AM to 4:30 PM.
MEDIATION will occur via telephone or videoconference.
PREHEARING CONFERENCE will be held on August 19, 2022, at 3:00 PM.
DUE PROCESS HEARING will be held on August 30 through September 1, 2022.
The hearing shall begin at 9:30 AM on all days unless otherwise ordered. The hearing shall continue day to day, as needed at the discretion of the Administrative Law Judge. Prehearing conference statements and motions are due to OAH no later than three business days before the prehearing conference or with a showing of good cause why it was not timely filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Clifford H. Woosley Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings Signature:
Email: Clifford.Woosley@dgs.ca.gov Title: Administrative Company: CA Department of General Services (DGS)
