California OAH special education order · February 17, 2023

Order Following Prehearing Conference for Hearing by Videoconference, and Dismissing Certain of District's Issues

OAH Case No. 2023010119, 2022080567 · ALJ Christine Arden

OAH set Student's five issues and Granite Mountain Charter School's three assessment-defense issues for a videoconference hearing, and dismissed all other issues in the school's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

This case went to decision

Student v. Granite Mountain Charter School: Granite Mountain Charter School prevails on all claims, including IEE requests and therapist supervision; one claim dismissed with prejudice. (2023)

Summary

After a prehearing conference in these consolidated cases, the ALJ framed the issues for a Zoom hearing starting March 7, 2023. Student's issues cover four topics: the school's delay in responding to Parent's June 2022 request for independent educational evaluations, its failure to implement occupational therapy and speech services, its interference with Parent's participation in IEP meetings, and an unclear "as needed" offer of behavior consultation. The school's case was limited to defending its August 2021 occupational therapy, speech and language, and functional behavior assessments. All other issues in the school's complaint were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. No mediation was scheduled because the school declined to take part.

Why it matters

A district's own due process complaint can be cut back at the prehearing conference to the issues OAH can actually hear, such as defending its assessments against an IEE request. Parents can also raise a district's delay in filing or funding IEEs as a separate FAPE claim.

Key authority cited

  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g)
  • Ed. Code § 56505, subd. (e)(7)
  • Ed. Code § 56505.1, subd. (h)
  • Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49
  • M.C. v. Antelope Valley Union High School Dist. (9th Cir. 2017) 858 F.3d 1189

People named in the order

  • Vivian Billups Randolph, Attorney for Granite Mountain Charter School
  • Christine Arden, Administrative Law Judge

Topics

prehearing conference jurisdiction independent educational evaluation charter school consolidated case self-represented parent

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CONSOLIDATED MATTERS INVOLVING:

PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT,

and

GRANITE MOUNTAIN CHARTER SCHOOL,

OAH CASE NUMBER 2023010119

OAH CASE NUMBER 2022080567

ORDER FOLLOWING PREHEARING CONFERENCE FOR

HEARING BY VIDEOCONFERENCE, AND DISMISSING

CERTAIN OF DISTRICT’S ISSUES

FEBRUARY 17, 2023

On February 17, 2023, Administrative Law Judge Christine Arden, Office of Administrative Hearings, held a prehearing conference by videoconference. The Administrative Law Judge is called an ALJ. The Office of Administrative Hearings is called OAH. The prehearing conference is called a PHC.

Mother appeared on behalf of Student. Vivian Billups Randolph, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Granite Mount Charter School. The PHC was recorded. Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:

HEARING DATES, TIMES, AND LOCATION

DUE PROCESS HEARING

The hearing will take place on March 7, 2023, through March 9, 2023, and continue day to day at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 AM each day and generally end at 3:30 PM, unless otherwise ordered. The parties anticipate it will take four to seven days to complete the hearing. Additional hearing dates will be discussed with the ALJ during the hearing.

HEARING LOCATION

OAH is authorized to conduct due process hearings by videoconference or telephone. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) OAH will conduct the due process hearing by videoconference using the Zoom application. Unless otherwise ordered, participants are required to appear by videoconference using computer or device with video capability and Zoom.

The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates and shall subpoena witnesses, if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will appear to testify. A party’s failure to notify or subpoena a witness to testify will not be considered good cause to continue the hearing. Instructions for issuing and responding to subpoenas and optional forms for subpoenas can be found on the website at https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OAH/Case-Types/Special- Education/Forms/Subpoenas?search=special%20education%20subpoena.

ISSUES AND PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS

The issues at the due process hearing, and proposed resolutions, as alleged in the complaint and clarified by the parties and the ALJ during the PHC are:

ISSUES

STUDENT’S ISSUES:

1. Did Granite Mountain Charter School deny Student a free appropriate public

education, called a FAPE, during the 2022-2023 school year through January 6, 2023, by delaying to either file an action with OAH until August 29, 2022, to defend its assessments of Student in the areas of occupational therapy, speech and language, and functional behavior, as legally compliant, or fund independent educational evaluations in those areas in response to Parent’s verbal request for independent educational evaluations made at the June 10, 2022 individualized educational program, called an IEP, team meeting, and in an email?

2. Did Granite Mountain Charter School deny Student a FAPE, during the 2021-2022

school year by failing to implement occupational therapy services and speech and language services by using either properly credentialed therapists, or by properly supervised assistants?

3. Did Granite Mountain Charter School deny Student a FAPE, during the 2021-2022

school year from February 2022, by significantly impeding upon Parent’s opportunity to participate in the decision-making process regarding provision of a FAPE to Student by:

a. failing to have neither the occupational therapist and the speech and

language pathologist, nor their assistants who worked with Student, attend the IEP team meetings held in February, May, and June, 2022;

b. forbidding Student’s special education teacher from sharing data

regarding Student’s academic progress on goals and other collected data about Student, at the IEP team meeting held on June10, 2022;

c. failing to allow discussion of Parent’s concerns at the IEP team meetings

held in May 2022, and June 2022; and

d. changing Student’s goals in the areas of speech and language, and

occupational therapy without Parent’s consent?

4. Did Granite Mountain Charter School deny Student a FAPE, in the IEP dated May

25, 2022, and the IEP dated June 10, 2022, by failing to make a clear offer of a FAPE by stating that the applied behavioral analysis consultation will be provided “as needed,” rather than for an exact number of minutes per month?

5. Did Granite Mountain Charter School deny Student a FAPE by failing to

implement Student’s goals in the areas of speech and language, and occupational therapy, offered in the IEP(s) dated February 2022, May 25, 2022, and June 10, 2022?

DISTRICT’S ISSUES:

1. Was Granite Mountain Charter School’s August 2021 occupational therapy

assessment of Student legally compliant, such that Student is not entitled to an independent educational evaluation in the area of occupational therapy at public expense?

2. Was Granite Mountain Charter School’s August 2021 speech and language

assessment of Student legally compliant, such that Student is not entitled to an independent educational evaluation in the area of speech and language at public expense?

3. Was Granite Mountain Charter School’s August 2021 functional behavior

assessment of Student legally compliant, such that Student is not entitled to an independent educational evaluation in the area of functional behavior at public expense? All other issues alleged in Granite Mountain Charter School’s due process request are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

A party must immediately file a written request for relief if the issues as stated in this Order do not reflect their understanding of the issues as clarified at the PHC.

PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS

The resolutions requested by Student include an Order finding that Granite Mountain Charter School shall fund independent educational evaluations in areas as established at hearing. Student further seeks an Order that Granite Mountain Charter School shall fund compensatory education as established at hearing.

The resolutions requested by Granite Mountain Charter School include an Order finding that its assessments of Student conducted in August 2021, in the areas of occupational therapy, speech and language, and functional behavior, were legally compliant, and Student is not entitled to independent educational evaluations in those areas at public expense.

Granite Mountain Charter School filed its response to Student’s complaint on January 9, 2023. (M.C. v. Antelope Valley Union High School Dist. (9th Cir. 2017) 858 F.3d 1189, 1199-1200.)

EXHIBITS

The parties shall serve their exhibits on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). The parties shall upload their exhibits electronically according to the Order Setting Procedures for Filing Exhibits Electronically.

Timely uploading electronic hearing exhibits five business days before the first day of hearing constitutes that party’s timely exchange of evidence in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7).

Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not timely exchanged as required by Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7) shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless the ALJ rules that it is admissible.

IDENTIFYING EXHIBITS AND PAGE NUMBERS

Each exhibit must be identified by a letter and number. Student must use the letter S before the number to identify Student’s exhibits. Granite Mountain Charter School must use the letter D before the number to identify its exhibits. For example, S-1 means Student’s exhibit 1 and D-1 means Granite Mountain Charter School’s exhibit 1.

A cover sheet with this identifying letter and number should be the first page of each exhibit. The electronic evidence program will automatically number the exhibits and additional page numbering or bates stamping should not be added.

CONTENT

Each exhibit must consist of one document. Separate documents may not be combined into one exhibit. Emails may be consolidated into one exhibit if they are part of a single chain of messages. Exhibits should be in chronological order.

Parties should include resumes or curriculum vitae for each witness expected to testify as an expert or about their education or professional experience or credentials.

Granite Mountain Charter School’s exhibits must include a copy of the school calendar for each regular and extended school year in question.

Electronic copies of exhibits filed with OAH shall be filed by 5:00 PM at least five business days before the first day of hearing. Please refer to the General Order OAH issued with the Scheduling Order that contains the Order Setting Procedures for Filing Exhibits Electronically. It includes instructions for how to file exhibits electronically.

Beginning three business days before the hearing, the electronic evidence system will not allow parties to upload exhibits unless permitted by the ALJ during the hearing at the ALJ’s discretion.

WITNESSES

The parties shall serve their list of witnesses on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505. No party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.

Parties are responsible for ensuring that all participants are familiar with and follow the Instructions for Joining the Online Due Process Hearing provided with this Order. Participants who have not previously used the Zoom application, may find informative instructions on at by visiting, Getting Started with Zoom at https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/categories/200101697.

The parties are responsible for ensuring that their witnesses join the virtual hearing room at the designated date and time to testify. Witnesses are required to join the due process hearing by computer and appear by videoconference unless they do not have the necessary computer equipment. If a witness does not have the necessary equipment, the ALJ may permit the witnesses to appear by audio only or by telephone.

“Audio only” means using a computer without video. A witness’s inability to attend the hearing by videoconference will be discussed at the start of the hearing.

The parties are responsible for producing their own witnesses unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ. Parties shall make witnesses under their control reasonably available. The parties must schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order.

The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses and the time allowed for testimony. Education Code, section 56505.1, subdivision (h), empowers the ALJ to set a reasonable limit on the length of the hearing after consideration of four factors. The first two factors are the issues to be heard and the complexity of facts to be proven. The second two factors are the ability of the parties or their representatives to present their respective cases and the parties’ estimates of the time needed to present their cases.

MEET AND CONFER

The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness and exhibit lists before the hearing. Evidence may be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear.

The parties are ordered to meet and confer no later than 5:00 PM on March 1, 2023, to discuss scheduling witnesses and how much time each witness will take. The parties shall discuss any issues related to counsel and witnesses appearing by videoconference for hearing, electronically viewing exhibits during the hearing, and subpoenas, if any. The parties should attempt to eliminate duplicate exhibits from their hearing exhibits. The parties shall discuss whether they can produce a written stipulation as to pertinent facts, contentions, resolutions and the authenticity and admissibility of documents to shorten the length of time needed for the hearing.

As part of the meet and confer process, Granite Mountain Charter School shall inform Student which proposed witnesses are District employees. Granite Mountain Charter School shall also identify the witnesses on Student’s list that require a subpoena.

Granite Mountain Charter School is ordered to either agree to accept service for a witness under its control, or provide Student with the witness’s most recent contact information.

PARTICIPANT INFORMATION FORM

Both parties have an ongoing obligation to ensure that OAH has current information on the Participant Information Form filed with OAH and shall file an updated Form as necessary. The Participant Information Form is not served upon the opposing party. The ongoing obligation to ensure that the Participant Information Form filed with OAH is current does not change the parties’ statutory obligation to timely disclose their witnesses to the other party(s) at least five business days prior to hearing.

The parties must file an updated Participant Information Form to inform OAH of any changes, additions, or deletions, including the required information no later than 5:00 PM at least two business days before the first day of hearing.

Any contact information provided shall be used for the limited purpose of issuing subpoenas or for contacting a witness to attend the hearing. Any contact information shall not be disclosed to any other person.

EVIDENCE PRESENTATION

In an administrative proceeding, the burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49, 62.) In this case Student requested a hearing and bears the burden of proof on his case. Granite Mountain Charter School also requested hearing and bears the burden of proof on its case. In this consolidated matter, Student’s case-in-chief shall be presented first, followed by Granite Mountain Charter School’s case-in-chief, unless otherwise ordered.

WITNESS LISTS

The parties must provide a joint proposed witness list to the ALJ on the first day of hearing. The list should include the first and last name of the witness, which party is calling the witness to testify, and include dates and time estimates of each witness’s expected testimony. In the event an agreement cannot be reached, each party shall prepare a separate written list. Granite Mountain Charter School must have witnesses available in case there is no agreement.

At the beginning of the hearing, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses. The ALJ will finalize the witness schedule. Parties must be prepared at the end of each day to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the estimated time for the testimony of each witness.

SCOPE OF WITNESS EXAMINATION

Each witness will be called to testify only once, except for rebuttal purposes. All parties must examine a witness on all issues when the witness is first called to testify.

Requiring a witness to appear only once takes priority over the order in which parties present their cases-in-chief.

AUDIO ONLY OR TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY

Whether a witness may appear by audio only or telephone instead of videoconference is a matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by audio only or telephone shall request permission to do so before the hearing. Any party seeking to present a witness who cannot access exhibits electronically must inform the ALJ at the beginning of the hearing.

ELECTRONIC RECORDINGS

AUDIO RECORDING

A party may request permission to make an audio recording of the hearing.

Permission to make an audio recording is subject to the ALJ’s discretion and based upon the following conditions:

1. the OAH recording is the only official recording;

2. the parties shall turn their recording device on and off at the same time

that the ALJ is on and off the record to avoid recording conversations while off the record;

3. operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay

the hearing;

4. a party’s recording may not be given, provided or played to a witness, or

potential witness;

5. the recording is subject to the same confidentiality as the due process

hearing; and

6. participants shall not take screenshots of the videoconference nor share or

publish any portion of the videoconference or audio recording.

Both Student’s and District’s requests to make an audio recording of the hearing are granted, subject to the above six conditions.

VIDEO RECORDING

No party, witness or anyone else may videorecord any part of the proceedings or stream live through any means.

RECORDINGS AS EXHIBITS

Recordings may not be uploaded electronically without the ALJ’s permission. The ALJ has discretion to admit or exclude evidence in the form of a recording. Any request to submit a recording shall be considered at the time of hearing.

The ALJ may grant or deny the request or grant the request subject to certain conditions. The party offering the recording must establish that all or a part of the recording is relevant. The ALJ may request a transcript of the portion of the recording requested or have the party offering the recording to provide an exact identifiable portion of the recording the party seeks to admit. The identities of any person speaking on the portion of the tape being introduced must be established. An ALJ may allow the opposing party to offer additional portions of a recording to establish the context, or to rebut, the recording.

COMPENSATORY EDUCATION OR REIMBURSEMENT

Any party seeking reimbursement for expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of the expenditures. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education. Documents offered as evidence to support a request for reimbursement must be separated by vendor.

MOTIONS

Student requested a mediation be scheduled. However, Granite Mountain Charter School declined to participate in a mediation. Since mediation is voluntary and both parties are not willing to participate in a mediation, a mediation was not scheduled by the ALJ.

No other prehearing motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion that was not filed three business days before the PHC, shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause why the motion was not timely filed.

STIPULATIONS

Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions, resolutions and authenticity and admissibility of documents are encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in writing prior to the start of the hearing.

CONDUCT OF PARTICIPANTS AND HEARING ROOM DECORUM

All participants to the videoconference should observe the same decorum as in an in-person due process hearing. Participants must conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times. Cellular phones, telephones and computer notifications must be shut off or set to silent during the hearing unless the ALJ grants permission otherwise. Participants should appear from a private location, unless otherwise ordered. Participants should take reasonable efforts to minimize background noise and maintain adequate room lighting. Use of virtual background images are at the discretion of the ALJ. Witnesses are prohibited from reading exhibits, documents, notes, text messages, telephones or computers while testifying, unless permitted to do so by the ALJ. The parties, their representative and witnesses are prohibited from passing notes to, exchanging electronic messages with, or signaling the witness in any way while the witness is testifying.

LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS

A party or participant in this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in a mediation or hearing may contact OAH at (916) 263-0880, or send an email to OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov as soon as the need is known. The e-mail should have “Request for Accommodation” in the Subject Line.

Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OAH/Services/Page-Content/Office-of- Administrative-Hearings-Services-List-Folder/Request-Reasonable-Accommodations- for-OAH-Legal-Proceedings.

HEARING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

The hearing is open to the public. Special education hearings are closed to the public unless a student requests the hearing to be open to the public.

An ALJ may restrict attendance because of the physical limitations of the hearing facility or take other action to promote due process or the orderly conduct of the hearing. (Cal. Code Regs., Tit. 1, § 1030.) Government Code, section 11425.20 empowers the ALJ to order an open hearing to be closed or make other protective orders to the extent necessary or proper to ensure a fair hearing in the circumstances of the case. Currently, amid COVID-19 concerns, all hearings are being conducted via videoconference without observers present or participating in the videoconference.

OAH will provide the hearing recording upon request.

SETTLEMENT

The parties are encouraged to continue working together to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately if they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing.

In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880. At the same time, the parties should send the signature page of the signed agreement or a letter withdrawing the case to OAH by visiting OAH Secure e-file at https://www.applications.dgs.ca.gov/oah/oahsftweb.

If a full and final written settlement agreement is reached after 4:00 PM the day prior to hearing, the parties shall leave a voicemail message regarding the settlement at (916) 274-6035. The parties should also leave contact information such as cellular phone numbers of each party or counsel for each party.

Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received and processed by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages before the hearing.

If the matter settles subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement, the parties shall provide the date of the next board meeting. The hearing dates will not be cancelled without this information.

FAILURE TO COMPLY

The failure to comply with this Order may result in the exclusion of evidence or other sanctions.

ORDER INCLUDES ALL RULINGS

This Order includes all rulings made at the prehearing conference. Any discussion and conversation not referenced in this Order is not binding on the ALJ conducting the hearing and may not be relied upon by the parties. The parties should be aware that, at hearing, the ALJ conducting the hearing has discretion to reconsider any part of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Christine Arden Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings