California OAH special education order · April 7, 2023

Order Requiring Supplemental Evidence

OAH Case No. 2023020865 · ALJ Marlo Nisperos

OAH deferred ruling on Student's stay put motion and ordered Student to file the last agreed upon and implemented IEP, which was missing from the motion, with district responses to follow.

Ruling Stay put

Summary

On March 16, 2023, Student filed a motion for stay put. The motion included a prior written notice from Antioch Unified School District but not Student's last agreed upon and implemented IEP. OAH ordered Student to file that IEP by April 13, 2023, at 3:00 p.m. Antioch and Alameda Unified School Districts must file their responses by April 17, 2023, at 5:00 p.m.

Why it matters

OAH decides stay put by looking at the last agreed upon and implemented IEP. A stay put motion should attach that IEP, or the ruling may be delayed.

Topics

stay put supplemental evidence last implemented iep multiple districts

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE MATTER OF:

PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT,

v.

ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND

ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.

OAH CASE NUMBER 2023020865

ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE

APRIL 7, 2023

On March 16, 2023, Student filed a motion for stay put with the Office of Administrative Hearings, called OAH. Student’s motion included a prior written notice from Antioch Unified School District. Student did not attach a copy of Student’s last agreed upon and implemented individualized education program, called IEP. Student must file with OAH a copy of the last agreed upon and implemented IEP by Thursday, April 13, 2023, at 3:00 p.m.

Antioch Unified School District and Alameda Unified School District must file their responses by Monday, April 17, 2023, at 5:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Marlo Nisperos Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings