California OAH special education order · November 12, 2024

Order Clarifying Issue 9

OAH Case No. 2024010524 · ALJ Laurie Gorsline

ALJ corrected Issue 9 during the hearing to match Student's complaint. As corrected, the issue asks whether Los Angeles Unified predetermined exiting Student from special education before the October 23, 2023 IEP, without parental consent.

Issue 9 restated Other orders

This case went to decision

Student v. Los Angeles Unified School District: Los Angeles Unified prevails on all 13 claims by a high-achieving autistic student; missing prior written notice found harmless. (2025)

Summary

Partway through a multi-day due process hearing, the ALJ revisited Issue 9. She acted after discussing it with the parties on November 6, 2024, and reviewing the complaint again. On her own motion, she issued an order correcting Issue 9 so it accurately reflects the complaint. As corrected, the issue is whether Los Angeles Unified denied Student a FAPE by predetermining, before the October 23, 2023 IEP and without parental consent, to exit Student from special education.

Why it matters

The ALJ can correct how an issue is worded even during the hearing so that it matches what the complaint actually alleged. Self-represented parents should check the issue statements closely and raise any mismatch with the ALJ.

People named in the order

  • Kara Hatfield, Administrative Law Judge (prehearing conference)
  • Laurie Gorsline, Administrative Law Judge (hearing)
  • Brian Davenport, Attorney for Los Angeles Unified

Topics

issue clarification predetermination exit from special education parental consent self-represented parent

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE MATTER OF:

PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT,

V.

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.

OAH CASE NUMBER 2024010524

ORDER CLARIFYING ISSUE 9

NOVEMBER 12, 2024

On January 16, 2024, the Office of Administrative Hearings, called OAH, received a due process hearing request from Parent on behalf of Student, called a complaint, naming Los Angeles Unified School District, called Los Angeles Unified.

On August 19, 2024, Administrative Law Judge Kara Hatfield held a prehearing conference by videoconference. On August 20. 2024, OAH issued an Order Following Prehearing Conference.

Administrative Law Judge Laurie Gorsline, called the ALJ, heard this matter by videoconference on September 17, 18, 20, 24, 25, and November 5, 6 and 7, 2024.

Parent represented Student. Attorney Brian Davenport represented Los Angeles Unified.

On September 19, 2024, the ALJ issued an Order Clarifying Issues for Hearing.

Based upon the discussion with the parties on November 6, 2024, and the Administrative Law Judge’s further review of the complaint, the ALJ issues the following order correcting Issue 9 to accurately reflect the issue stated in the complaint. A free appropriate education is called a FAPE. An individualized education program is called an IEP.

ISSUE 9

9. Did Los Angeles Unified deny Student a FAPE by predetermining to exit

Student from special education prior to the October 23, 2023 IEP, without parental consent?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Laurie Gorsline Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings