California OAH special education order · August 1, 2024

Order Granting Motion to Consolidate

OAH Case No. 2024070979, 2024030766 · ALJ Charles Marson

OAH consolidated Monrovia's new due process case with Student's pending case over Student's timeliness objection. Monrovia plausibly explained its late filing as a response to Parents' new private school reimbursement demand.

This case went to decision

Student v. Monrovia Unified School District (consolidated): Monrovia Unified denied FAPE by not offering social skills training and must fund up to $3,200 in PEERS sessions. (2024)

Summary

Monrovia filed its own due process case and a motion to consolidate it with Student's earlier case less than a month before Student's hearing was set to begin. Student opposed, arguing the motion came too late and was meant to delay the hearing. OAH granted consolidation. Both cases turn on the March 15, 2024 IEP offer and the independent assessment by Dr. Helena Johnson, and Monrovia adequately explained its timing: Parents' July 29, 2024 10-day notice demanded reimbursement for a private school placement. Student showed no prejudice, so OAH made Monrovia's case the primary case, vacated Student's dates, and reset the hearing to August 27-29, 2024.

Why it matters

When opposing a late consolidation motion, families should show concrete prejudice and address the district's stated reasons, not timing alone. Here, sending a 10-day notice seeking reimbursement gave the district a credible reason to file its own case and move the hearing date and the 45-day decision timeline.

Key authority cited

  • Gov. Code, § 11507.3, subd. (a)
  • Code Civ. Proc., § 1048, subd. (a)

People named in the order

  • Dr. Helena Johnson, Independent educational assessor

Topics

consolidation unilateral placement 10-day notice reimbursement hearing delay independent educational evaluation

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CONSOLIDATED MATTERS INVOLVING:

MONROVIA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,

and

PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT,

OAH CASE NUMBER 2024070979

OAH CASE NUMBER 2024030766

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

AUGUST 1, 2024

On March 21, 2024, Student filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings a Request for Due Process Hearing in OAH case number 2024030766, Student's Case, naming the Monrovia Unified School District.

On July 30, 2024, Monrovia filed a Request for Due Process Hearing in OAH case number 2024070979, District's case, naming Student. On that same day Monrovia filed a motion to consolidate the two matters.

On August 1, 2024, Student filed an opposition to the motion to consolidate on the ground that it was filed too late and too close to the upcoming hearing in his case, which is calendared to begin on August 20, 2024.

CONSOLIDATION

No statute or regulation specifically provides a standard to be applied in deciding a motion to consolidate special education cases. However, OAH will generally consolidate matters that involve the same parties, a common question of law and/or fact, and when consolidation of the matters furthers the interests of judicial economy by saving time or preventing inconsistent rulings. (See Gov. Code, § 11507.3, subd. (a)

[administrative proceedings may be consolidated if they involve a common question of law or fact]; Code of Civ. Proc., § 1048, subd. (a) [same applies to civil cases].)

Here, both cases involve common questions of law and fact. In his case, Student alleges, among other things, that Monrovia denied him a free appropriate public education, called a FAPE, when it declined at a March 15, 2024 individual education program, called IEP, team meeting to consider the results and recommendations of an independent educational assessment by Dr. Helena Johnson. In District's case, Monrovia alleges that the program offered at the March 15, 2004 IEP team meeting would provide Student a FAPE in the least restrictive environment, and that it should be allowed to implement that program should Parents again seek special education from the District.

Student appears to agree that the two cases involve common questions of law and fact, but opposes the motion on the ground that it was filed too late. Anticipating this argument, Monrovia asserts that it only filed its action because on July 29, 2024, it received from Parents a 10-day notice of unilateral action announcing that they had enrolled Student in a private school for the upcoming academic year and would seek reimbursement from the District.

In his opposition, Student asserts that this chronology shows that Monrovia is attempting by its motion to consolidate to delay the upcoming hearing. It also asserts that Monrovia "has cited no authority or explanation" to explain why a 10-day notice of unilateral placement would require it to file a separate due process complaint. However, Monrovia's motion does provide an explanation by asserting that the 10-day notice included a demand by Parents for reimbursement for the expenses of the private placement for the next school year. It is at least plausible that a district otherwise not motivated to file its own request for due process would change its strategy when newly faced with the prospect of having to pay for a year's worth of tuition and related expenses for a unilateral private school enrollment. Student's opposition does not mention the reimbursement demand.

Monrovia has adequately explained the timing of its motion. In addition, Student does not attempt to establish that any prejudice to his interests would result from granting the motion to consolidate.

As shown above, Student's Case and Monrovia's Case involve common questions of law and fact. In addition, consolidation furthers the interests of judicial economy because the witnesses and documents required for proof in the two matters will substantially overlap. Consolidation will also avoid the prospect of inconsistent judgments. Accordingly, consolidation is granted.

ORDER

1. Monrovia's Motion to Consolidate is granted.

2. Monrovia's Case is designated as the primary case. All dates previously set

in Student's Case, OAH case number 2024030766, are vacated.

3. The 45-day timeline for issuance of the decision in the consolidated cases

shall be based on the date of the filing of the complaint in Monrovia's Case, OAH case number 2024070979. The prehearing conference is calendared for August 16, 2024, at 10 AM. The due process hearing is calendared for August 27, 28, and 29, 2024.

Charles Marson Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings