California OAH special education order · October 15, 2024

Order Determining Due Process Complaint Sufficient

OAH Case No. 2024100161 · ALJ Paul H. Kamoroff

OAH found Student's due process complaint against Bellflower sufficient because it identified four issues, gave adequate facts, and stated well-defined proposed resolutions.

Complaint found sufficient Sufficiency of complaint

Summary

Bellflower filed a Notice of Insufficiency challenging Student's due process complaint. OAH denied the challenge and found the complaint sufficient. It identified four issues, well-defined proposed resolutions, and enough facts for Bellflower to respond and take part in a resolution session and mediation. All mediation, prehearing conference, and hearing dates were confirmed.

Why it matters

A complaint that clearly states its issues, the supporting facts, and proposed resolutions will survive a district's sufficiency challenge, because OAH reads pleading requirements liberally under the IDEA.

Key authority cited

  • 20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(7)(A)
  • 20 U.S.C. § 1415(c)
  • Sen. Rep. No. 108-185
  • 71 FR 46540-46541, 46699
  • Escambia County Bd. of Educ. v. Benton (S.D. Ala. 2005) 406 F.Supp.2d 1248

Topics

sufficiency notice of insufficiency pleading standards due process complaint

Full text of the order

Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.

BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE MATTER OF:

PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT,

v.

BELLFLOWER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.

OAH CASE NUMBER 2024100161

ORDER DETERMINING DUE PROCESS COMPLAINT

SUFFICIENT

OCTOBER 15, 2024

On October 3, 2024, Parent on behalf of Student filed a Due Process Hearing Request, called a complaint, with the Office of Administrative Hearings, called OAH, naming Bellflower Unified School District, called Bellflower. On October 14, 2024, Bellflower filed a Notice of Insufficiency as to the complaint.

The named parties have the right to challenge the complaint’s sufficiency.

(20 U.S.C. § 1415(b) & (c).) The party filing the complaint is not entitled to a hearing unless the complaint meets the requirements of title 20 United States Code section 1415(b)(7)(A).

A complaint is sufficient if it: (1) describes the problem relating to the proposed change regarding the Student’s identification, evaluation, or educational placement, or providing the Student a free appropriate public education; (2) includes facts about the problem; and (3) includes a proposed resolution to the extent known and available to the party at the time. (20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(7)(A)(ii)(III) & (IV).) These requirements prevent vague and confusing complaints, and promote fairness by providing the named parties with sufficient information to know how to prepare for the hearing and how to participate in resolution sessions and mediation. (See H.R.Rep. No. 108-77, 1st Sess.

(2003), p. 115; Sen. Rep. No. 108-185, 1st Sess. (2003), pp. 34-35.)

The complaint provides enough information when it provides an awareness and understanding of the issues forming the basis of the complaint. (Sen. Rep. No. 108-185, supra, at p. 34.) The pleading requirements should be liberally construed in light of the broad remedial purposes of the IDEA and the relative informality of the due process hearings it authorizes. (Alexandra R. ex rel. Burke v. Brookline School Dist. (D.N.H., Sept.

10, 2009, CIV. 06-CV-0215-JL) 2009 WL 2957991[nonpub. opn.]; Escambia County Bd. Of Educ. V. Benton (S.D. Ala. 2005) 406 F.Supp.2d 1248, 1259-1260; Sammons v. Polk County School Bd. (M.D. Fla., Oct. 28, 2005, 8:04CV2657T24EAJ) 2005 WL 2850076 [nonpub. Opn.]; but cf. M.S.-G v. Lenape Regional High School Dist. Bd. Of Educ. (3d Cir.

2009) 306 Fed.Appx. 772, 775 [nonpub. opn.].) Whether the complaint is sufficient is a matter within the sound discretion of the Administrative Law Judge. (Assistance to States for the Educ. Of Children with Disabilities & Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities (Aug. 14, 2006) 71 FR 46,540-46541, 46699.)

The facts alleged in Student’s complaint are sufficient. Student’s complaint identifies four issues, well-defined proposed resolutions, and adequate facts about the problems to permit Bellflower to respond and participate in a resolution session and mediation. Student has met the statutorily required standard regarding identifying issues, facts, and proposed resolutions. (20 U.S.C. §1415(b)(7)(A)(ii)(IV).)

ORDER

1. The complaint is sufficient under title 20 United States Code section

1415(b)(7)(A)(ii).

2. All mediation, prehearing conference, and hearing dates in this matter are

confirmed.

Paul H Kamoroff Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings