OAH Special Education Decisions Involving California Department of Education
7 decisions: student prevailed on all issues in 5, split in 0, district prevailed on all issues in 2.
Search and filter these decisions · 9 OAH orders involving California Department of Education
- Student v. California Department of EducationCalifornia Department of Education did not deny FAPE when state schools for the deaf and blind declined to assess student.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Los Angeles County Office of Education et al.On remand, LACOE was responsible for RTC placement until juvenile hall release; LAUSD is responsible afterward, and CDE is not.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Los Angeles Unified School District et al.Los Angeles County Office of Education must immediately implement a juvenile hall student's IEP by placing him at an out-of-state residential treatment center and funding the educational and related services part of the placement.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Orange County Department of Education et al. (consolidated)Irvine Unified, not Orange County's education office or the state, must provide FAPE for a court ward's Texas residential placement.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Orange County Department of Education et al. (consolidated)Newport-Mesa Unified, home district of a dependent youth's court-appointed responsible adult, was responsible for her FAPE during an out-of-state placement.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Orange County Department of Education et al. (consolidated)The responsible adult's district, not Orange County Department of Education or CDE, owed FAPE to a juvenile dependent placed out of state.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Orange County Department of Education et al.Orange County Department of Education must implement IEP and fund Utah residential placement; LAUSD, Charter Oak, and CDE not responsible.Student prevailed on all issues