California OAH special education order · November 27, 2013
Order Following Pre-Hearing Conference
OAH Case No. 2013100575 · ALJ Robert Helfand
OAH granted Student's motion to exclude all witnesses except the parties from the hearing room and set a December 2013 hearing on whether a moderate/severe special day class denied Student FAPE in the least restrictive environment.
This case went to decision
Student v. Irvine Unified School District: Irvine Unified's moderate/severe autism class offers for 2012-2014 upheld; all of Student's least restrictive environment claims denied. (2014)
Summary
After a telephonic prehearing conference, ALJ Robert Helfand set the due process hearing for December 10-12 and 17, 2013 at the District's offices. The single issue is whether the District denied Student a FAPE by placing Student in a moderate/severe special day class that was not an appropriate placement in the least restrictive environment. The ALJ granted Student's motion to exclude all witnesses except the parties from the hearing room and said Student's motion to record the hearing would be decided on the first day of hearing. The order also set rules for exhibits, witness lists and scheduling, telephonic testimony, and evidence of reimbursement and compensatory education.
Why it matters
A party can ask the ALJ to keep witnesses out of the hearing room so that their testimony is not shaped by hearing others testify. Witnesses and exhibits left out of prehearing statements can be excluded unless good cause is shown by sworn declaration.
Key authority cited
- Ed. Code § 56505, subd. (e)(7)
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g)
People named in the order
- Michael Zhe, Witness (Student and District)
- Sharyn Kerr, Witness (Student)
- Jodi Cossit, Witness (Student and District)
- Kathy Durocher, Witness (Student and District)
- Debra Martin, Witness (Student and District)
- Courtney Tachiki, Witness (Student)
- Nancy Wilson, Witness (Student and District)
- Susan Kemp, Witness (Student and District)
- Jennifer Mobley, Witness (Student and District)
- Helen Wu, Witness (Student)
- Lindsay Castro, Witness (Student)
- Laura Biggerstaff, Witness (Student)
- Dr. Chris Davidson, Expert witness (Student)
- Jan Brenner, Witness (District)
- Mary Bevernick, Witness (District)
- Mary Clarke, Witness (District)
- Karen Clevenger, Witness (District)
- Maureen Jester, Witness (District)
- Stacy Kredel, Witness (District)
- Ginger Longwell, Witness (District)
- Roxanne Olsh, Witness (District)
- Linda Roth, Witness (District)
- Lauren Seng, Witness (District)
- Rebecca Von Duering, Witness (District)
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH CASE NO. 2013100575
v. ORDER FOLLOWING PRE-HEARING
CONFERENCE
IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
On December 2, 2013, a telephonic prehearing conference (PHC) was held before Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Robert Helfand, Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).
Jennifer Guze Campbell, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Parent on behalf of Student (Student). Alefia Mithaiwala, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of the Irvine Unified School District (District). The PHC was not recorded.
Based on discussion of the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:
1. Hearing Dates, Times, and Location. The hearing shall take place on
December 10 -12 and 17, 2013 at the District’s offices located 5050 Barranca Parkway, Irvine, CA 92604. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 a.m. the first day of the hearing and at 9:00 a.m. all other days unless otherwise ordered.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify.
A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.
2. Issue and Proposed Resolutions. The issue at the due process hearing is.
Whether the District has deprived Student of a free appropriate public education (FAPE) by placing Student in a moderate/severe special day class, which was not an appropriate placement in the least restrictive environment?
3. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring exhibit
binders prior to the hearing. The parties shall use numbers to identify exhibits, but shall place the letter “S” or “D” in front of the exhibit to designate if it is a Student or District exhibit (for example, “S-5, S-6, or D-1, D-2”). Each exhibit shall be internally paginated by exhibit, or all of a party’s exhibits shall be Bates-stamped. Each exhibit binder shall contain a detailed table of contents. The parties represent that they have served their evidence binders on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7).
At the hearing, each party shall supply an exhibit binder containing its exhibits for use by the ALJ, and a second exhibit binder for use by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH prior to the hearing. In the event of duplicate exhibits, the most legible version will be used.
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not included in the exhibit lists and not previously exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless it is supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
The parties are directed to meet and confer by December 6, 2013 to ensure that each party’s evidence book does not contain copies of the same documentary evidence.
4. Witnesses. Each party is responsible for procuring the attendance at hearing
of its own witnesses. Each party shall make witnesses under its control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. Neither party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not disclosed in the party’s prehearing conference statement except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
The parties are ordered to meet and confer by December 6, 2013, as to the schedule of witnesses. The parties have agreed to coordinate the availability and order of testimony of witnesses to ensure that there is a witness available to testify at all times during the hearing, and to ensure that the hearing is completed as scheduled.
The following witnesses will be called to testify by Student: Student’s parents, Michael Zhe, Sharyn Kerr, Jodi Cossit, Kathy Durocher, Debra Martin, Courtney Tachiki, Nancy Wilson, Susan Kemp, Jennifer Mobley, Helen Wu, Lindsay Castro, Laura Biggerstaff, and Dr. Chris Davidson. Student has designated Dr. Davidson as an expert witness.
The following witnesses will be called to testify by the District: Jan Brenner, Mary Bevernick, Student’s parents, Mary Clarke, Karen Clevenger, Jodi Cossit, Kathy Durocher, Maureen Jester, Susan Kemp, Stacy Kredel, Ginger Longwell, Debra Martin, Jennifer Mobley, Roxanne Olsh, Linda Roth, Lauren Seng, Rebecca Von Duering, Nancy Wilson, and Michael Zhe.
The witness schedule will be finalized at the commencement of the due process hearing. The parties shall be prepared at the end of each day of hearing to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the time the testimony of each such witness is expected to take.
The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness lists prior to the hearing, bearing in mind that evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear.
5. Scope of Witness Examination. After the first direct and cross-examinations,
each party shall be limited in examining the witness to only those matters raised in the immediately preceding examination.
6. Telephonic Testimony. Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a
matter within the discretion of the ALJ. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g). Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall move in advance for leave to do so, unless the opposing party has stipulated that the witness may appear by telephone. The proponent of the witness shall provide the proposed witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties, containing all of each party’s exhibits, prior to the hearing; and shall ensure that the hearing room has sound equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all these requirements have been fulfilled.
8. Motions. Student’s motion to exclude all witnesses, except for the parties from
the hearing room is granted.
Student’s motion to record the hearing will be ruled on at the first day of hearing.
No other pretrial motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion filed after this date shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause as to why the motion was not made prior to or during the prehearing conference.
9. Stipulations. Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are
encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in written form.
10. Conduct of Counsel and Hearing Room Decorum. Counsel, all parties, and all
witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times.
Cellular phones, pagers, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off or set to vibrate during the hearing unless permission to the contrary is obtained from the
ALJ.
11. Compensatory Education/Reimbursement. Any party seeking reimbursement
of expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of expenditures, as part of its case in chief. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.
12. Special Needs and Accommodations. At present neither party anticipates the
need for special accommodation for any witness or party, or for translation services.
13. Hearing Closed To the Public.
14. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue working together
to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.
IF A FULL AND FINAL WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS REACHED
AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A
VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035. THE
PARTIES SHOULD ALSO LEAVE CONTACT INFORMATION SUCH AS CELLULAR
PHONE NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY. THE
PARTIES SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY FAX THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE
SIGNED AGREEMENT OR A LETTER WITHDRAWING THE CASE TO THE OAH AT
THE FAXINATION LINE at 916-376-6319.
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.
16. Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of evidence or
other sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 27, 2013 /s/
ROBERT HELFAND
Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
