California OAH special education order · February 7, 2014
Order Following Pre-Hearing Conference
OAH Case No. 2013100575 · ALJ Laurie Gorsline
OAH denied Student's motion in limine to limit District witness testimony and Student's request to keep a District representative out of the hearing room, and set the hearing and issues.
This case went to decision
Student v. Irvine Unified School District: Irvine Unified's moderate/severe autism class offers for 2012-2014 upheld; all of Student's least restrictive environment claims denied. (2014)
Summary
At the prehearing conference, Student asked OAH to limit the testimony of District's witnesses and to prevent District from having a representative in the hearing room during testimony. The ALJ denied the motion in limine without prejudice and ruled that District may have a representative of its choice present. The order granted Student's request to audio record the hearing, limited use of the parties' recordings to the attorneys, and set two issues for hearing: whether District's offers of a moderate/severe special day class denied Student a FAPE in the least restrictive environment, and whether District failed to offer the same mainstreaming hours Student had in 2012-2013.
Why it matters
A motion in limine denied without prejudice can be raised again at hearing, but districts generally may keep a representative in the room. Parents can get permission to audio record the hearing, though the recordings stay with counsel and cannot be shared with witnesses or made public.
Key authority cited
- Ed. Code § 56505, subd. (e)(7)
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g)
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of:
PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, OAH CASE NO. 2013100575
v. ORDER FOLLOWING PRE-HEARING
CONFERENCE
IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
On February 7, 2014, a telephonic prehearing conference (PHC) was held before Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Laurie Gorsline, Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). Attorney Vanessa Jarvis and Attorney Amanda Selogie appeared on behalf of Student (Student). Attorney Alefia Mithaiwala appeared on behalf of Irvine Unified School District (District). The PHC was recorded.
Based on discussion of the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:
1. Hearing Dates, Times, and Location. The shall take place on February 18, 19,
20 and 24, 2014, and continuing day to day, Monday through Thursday as needed at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing shall begin each day at 9:00 a.m. and end at 5:00 p.m.
with the exception of the first day of hearing, on which day the hearing shall begin at 1:30 p.m., unless otherwise ordered.
The hearing shall take place at the Westwood Training Center located at 1 Liberty, Irvine, CA 92620, (949) 936-8500. District will ensure that parking is available for Student and his representatives and the ALJ.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates, and shall subpoena witnesses if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will be available to testify.
A witness will not be regarded as unavailable for purposes of showing “good cause” to continue the hearing if the witness is not properly notified of the hearing date or properly subpoenaed, as applicable.
2. Issues and Proposed Resolutions. The issues at the due process hearing are
listed below.
a) Did District deny Student a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment by offering a moderate/severe special day class (SDC) for the 2011-2012, 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 school years at the Individualized Education Program (IEP) team meetings held on or after October 15, 2011? b) Did District deny Student a FAPE for the 2013-2014 school year by failing to offer the same number of hours of mainstreaming Student received while attending Culverdale Elementary School during the 2012-2013 school year?
3. Exhibits. Exhibits shall be pre-marked and placed in three-ring exhibit
binders prior to the hearing. The parties shall use numbers to identify exhibits, but shall place the letter “S” or “D” in front of the exhibit to designate if it is a Student or District exhibit (for example, “S-5, S-6, or D-1, D-2”). Each exhibit shall be internally paginated by exhibit, or all of a party’s exhibits shall be Bates-stamped. Each exhibit binder shall contain a detailed table of contents. The parties shall serve their evidence binders on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). At the hearing, each party shall supply an exhibit binder containing its exhibits for use by the ALJ, and a second exhibit binder for use by witnesses. The parties may not serve exhibits on OAH prior to the hearing. In the event of duplicate exhibits, the most legible version will be used. The parties shall meet and confer to delete duplicate exhibits from the exhibit binders.
The parties shall exchange resumes or curriculum vitae for each witness who is expected to testify as to their professional credentials. Notwithstanding the requirements of Education Code section 56505, subd. (e)(7), the parties shall exchange resumes and curriculum vitae not later than 24 hours before the witness is scheduled to testify.
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not included in the exhibit lists and not previously exchanged shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless it is supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
4. Witnesses. Each party is responsible for procuring the attendance at hearing
of its own witnesses. Each party shall make witnesses under its control reasonably available. The parties shall schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order. The parties shall comply with Education Code section 56505(e)(7). Neither party shall be permitted to call witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
The parties are ordered to meet and confer by February 12, 2014 as to the schedule of witnesses and coordinate the availability and order of testimony of witnesses, to ensure that there is a witness available to testify at all times during the hearing, and to ensure that the hearing is completed as scheduled. On the first day of hearing, the parties shall provide the ALJ with a detailed schedule of witnesses which shall include an estimate of time for each side’s direct and cross examination. Each witness will only be called once to testify, except for rebuttal purposes, and both parties shall examine the witnesses when the witness is first called. Prior to the commencement of the due process hearing, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for cross-examination of each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses.
The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness lists prior to the hearing, bearing in mind that evidence will be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear such evidence.
The District shall have witnesses available in case agreement on a witness list is not reached. The parties shall be prepared at the end of each day of hearing to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the time the testimony of each such witness is expected to take. The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses who testify and the time allowed for witnesses’ testimony.
5. Telephonic Testimony. Neither party anticipates that any witness will testify
by telephone. Whether a witness may appear by telephone is a matter within the discretion of the ALJ. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g). Any party seeking to present a witness by telephone shall move in advance for leave to do so, unless the opposing party has stipulated that the witness may appear by telephone. The proponent of the witness shall provide the proposed witness with a complete set of exhibit binders from all parties, containing all of each party’s exhibits, prior to the hearing; and shall ensure that the hearing room has sound equipment that allows everyone in the room to hear the witness, and the witness to hear objections and rulings. No witness will be heard by telephone unless all these requirements have been fulfilled.
6. District Representative. Student’s motion to prevent District from having a
representative in the hearing room during testimony is denied. District may have a representative of its choice present in the hearing room during testimony.
7. Motions. Student filed a motion in limine to limit testimony of District’s
witnesses. Student’s motion in limine is denied without prejudice.
At present there are no other prehearing motions pending or contemplated. Any motion filed after this date shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause as to why the motion was not made prior to or during the prehearing conference of February 7, 2014.
8. Stipulations. Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions or resolutions are
encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in written form. The parties shall meet and confer prior to the hearing regarding any proposed stipulations.
9. Conduct of Counsel and Hearing Room Decorum. Counsel, all parties, and all
witnesses shall conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times.
Cellular phones, pagers, recorders, and other noisemaking electronic devices shall be shut off or set to silent during the hearing unless permission to the contrary is obtained from the ALJ.
Student’s request to audio record the hearing is granted. The OAH audio recording of the hearing is the only official record of the hearing. The parties’ recordings shall only be used by the parties’ attorneys to assist the attorneys with the conduct of the case. The recordings may not be shared with any potential witness in the case, and may not be publicly disseminated. The parties’ recorders must be turned off at all times that the ALJ has stated that the OAH recording is being taken off the record.
10. Compensatory Education/Reimbursement. Any party seeking reimbursement
of expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of expenditures, as part of its case in chief. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education.
11. Special Needs and Accommodations. At present neither party anticipates the
need for special accommodation for any witness or party, or for translation services.
12. Hearing Will Be Closed To the Public.
13. Settlement. The parties are encouraged to continue working together
to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately should they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing. In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880.
IF A FULL AND FINAL WRITTEN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS REACHED
AFTER 5:00 P.M. THE DAY PRIOR TO HEARING, THE PARTIES SHALL LEAVE A
VOICEMAIL MESSAGE REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT AT (916) 274-6035. THE
PARTIES SHOULD ALSO LEAVE CONTACT INFORMATION SUCH AS CELLULAR
PHONE NUMBERS OF EACH PARTY OR COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY. THE
PARTIES SHOULD SIMULTANEOUSLY FAX THE SIGNATURE PAGE OF THE
SIGNED AGREEMENT OR A LETTER WITHDRAWING THE CASE TO THE OAH AT
THE FAXINATION LINE at 916-376-6319.
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages the evening prior to the hearing or the morning of the hearing.
14. Failure to comply with this order may result in the exclusion of evidence or
other sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 07, 2014 /s/
LAURIE GORSLINE
Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
