California OAH special education order · March 13, 2023
Order Following Expedited Prehearing Conference for Hearing by Videoconference and Order Denying Crescent View's Motion to Unexpedite
OAH Case No. 2023020131 · ALJ Marlo Nisperos
OAH denied Crescent View's motion to unexpedite because Student's single expedited claim is against Clovis only, and found that the truancy-based change-of-placement claim qualifies for an expedited hearing.
Summary
Crescent View Public Charter School moved to unexpedite the case, arguing the complaint lacked the facts needed for an expedited hearing. At the prehearing conference, Student clarified that his only expedited claim is against Clovis. That claim is that Clovis impermissibly moved him to Community Day School for truancy that was a manifestation of his disability. The ALJ denied the motion, explaining that the expedited claim will proceed against Clovis while Crescent View remains a respondent in the non-expedited hearing. The ALJ also vacated her own briefing schedule, finding the claim meets the expedited threshold and the complaint gave Clovis enough notice of its alleged knowledge of Student's disability, while leaving open whether habitual truancy can violate a code of student conduct.
Why it matters
An expedited discipline hearing cannot be unexpedited while any expedited claim remains, even if one respondent is not involved in that claim. A change of placement based on truancy can be enough to trigger expedited discipline protections, with the code-of-conduct question decided at hearing.
Key authority cited
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(k)(3)(A)
- 20 U.S.C. § 1415(k)(4)(B)
- 34 C.F.R. § 300.532
- Molina v. Bd. of Educ. of Los Lunas Schools (D.N.M. 2016) 157 F.Supp.3d 1064
- Ed. Code § 56505.1(h)
- Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49
Topics
Full text of the order
Published text of the OAH order. Page headers and numbers from the original PDF have been dropped.
BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE MATTER OF:
PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT,
v.
CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND
CRESCENT VIEW PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL.
OAH CASE NUMBER 2023020131
ORDER FOLLOWING EXPEDITED PREHEARING
CONFERENCE FOR HEARING BY VIDEOCONFERENCE AND
ORDER DENYING CRESCENT VIEW’S
MOTION TO UNEXPEDITE
MARCH 13, 2023
On March 13, 2023, Administrative Law Judge Marlo Nisperos, Office of Administrative Hearings, held a prehearing conference by videoconference. The Administrative Law Judge is called an ALJ. The Office of Administrative Hearings is called OAH. The prehearing conference is called a PHC.
Rosa Hiriji, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Student. Kathleen Anderson, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Clovis Unified School District. Deborah Cesario, Attorney at Law, appeared on behalf of Crescent View Public Charter School. At PHC, Student clarified that he has not alleged any violations against respondent Crescent View in the expedited due process hearing. As a result, Crescent View elected to exit the PHC once the issue was clarified.
The PHC was recorded. Based upon discussion with the parties, the ALJ issues the following order:
HEARING DATES, TIMES, AND LOCATION
DUE PROCESS HEARING
The hearing will take place on March 21, 22, and 23, 2023, and continue day to day at the discretion of the ALJ. The hearing maybe held on Monday and Friday. The hearing shall begin at 9:30 AM each day and generally end at 3:30 PM, unless otherwise ordered. The parties anticipate it will take up to five days to complete the hearing.
Additional hearing dates will be discussed with the ALJ during the hearing.
HEARING LOCATION
OAH is authorized to conduct due process hearings by videoconference or telephone. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) OAH will conduct the due process hearing by videoconference using the Zoom application. Unless otherwise ordered, participants are required to appear by videoconference using computer or device with video capability and Zoom.
The parties shall immediately notify all potential witnesses of the hearing dates and shall subpoena witnesses, if necessary, to ensure that the witnesses will appear to testify. A party’s failure to notify or subpoena a witness to testify will not be considered good cause to continue the hearing. Instructions for issuing and responding to subpoenas and optional forms for subpoenas can be found on the website at https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OAH/Case-Types/Special- Education/Forms/Subpoenas?search=special%20education%20subpoena.
ISSUES AND PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS
The ALJ has clarified the statement of the issue as allowed by the holdings in J.W.
v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist. (9th Cir. 2010) 626 F.3d 431, 442-443, and Ford v. Long Beach Unified Sch. Dist. (9th Cir. 2002) 291 F.3d 1086, 1090. (But see M.C. v. Antelope Valley Union High Sch. Dist. (9th Cir. 2017) 858 F.3d 1189, 1196, fn. 2 [dictum].) No change in substance has been made. A party believing that the issue has been misstated or omitted shall promptly file a notice in writing stating its concern and citing relevant allegations in the complaint by page and lines. The issue at the due process hearing and proposed resolutions, as alleged in the complaint and clarified by the parties and the ALJ during the PHC are:
ISSUE
Did Clovis Unified School District impermissibly change Student’s placement to Community Day School for behaviors that were a manifestation of his disability?
PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS
The resolutions requested by Student include a manifestation determination meeting, expunge all Student records related to student attendance review board investigations and proceedings, compensatory education, and independent educational evaluation.
Clovis filed its response to Student’s amended complaint on February 17, 2023.
Crescent View filed its response to Student’s amended complaint on March 2, 2023.
(M.C. v. Antelope Valley Union High School Dist. (9th Cir. 2017) 858 F.3d 1189, 1199- 1200.)
EXHIBITS
The parties shall serve their exhibits on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7). The parties shall upload their exhibits electronically according to the Order Setting Procedures for Filing Exhibits Electronically.
Timely uploading electronic hearing exhibits five business days before the first day of hearing constitutes that party’s timely exchange of evidence in compliance with Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7).
Except for good cause shown, or unless used solely for rebuttal or impeachment, any exhibit not timely exchanged as required by Education Code section 56505, subdivision (e)(7) shall not be admitted into evidence at the hearing unless the ALJ rules that it is admissible.
IDENTIFYING EXHIBITS AND PAGE NUMBERS
Each exhibit must be identified by a letter and number. Student must use the letter S before the number to identify Student’s exhibits. Clovis must use the letter D before the number to identify Clovis’ exhibits. For example, S-1 means Student’s exhibit 1 and D-1 means Clovis exhibit 1. A cover sheet with this identifying letter and number should be the first page of each exhibit. The electronic evidence program will automatically number the exhibits and additional page numbering or bates stamping should not be added.
Based on Crescent View’s departure from the PHC, it was not ordered to upload exhibits for the expedited due process hearing.
CONTENT
Each exhibit must consist of one document. Separate documents may not be combined into one exhibit. Emails or letters may be consolidated into one exhibit if they are part of a single chain of messages. Exhibits should be in chronological order.
Parties should include resumes or curriculum vitae for each witness expected to testify as an expert.
Clovis’ exhibits must include a copy of the school calendar for each school year in question.
Electronic copies of exhibits filed with OAH shall be filed by 5:00 PM at least five business days before the first day of hearing. Please refer to the General Order OAH issued with the Scheduling Order that contains the Order Setting Procedures for Filing Exhibits Electronically. It includes instructions for how to file exhibits electronically.
Beginning three business days before the hearing, the electronic evidence system will not allow parties to upload exhibits unless permitted by the ALJ during the hearing at the ALJ’s discretion.
WITNESSES
The parties shall serve their list of witnesses on each other in compliance with Education Code section 56505. No party shall be permitted to call any witnesses not timely disclosed except for good cause shown, supported by written declaration under penalty of perjury, and at the discretion of the ALJ.
Parties are responsible for ensuring that all participants are familiar with and follow the Instructions for Joining the Online Due Process Hearing provided with this Order. Participants who have not previously used the Zoom application, may find informative instructions on at by visiting, Getting Started with Zoom at https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/categories/200101697.
The parties are responsible for ensuring that witnesses join the virtual hearing room at the designated date and time to testify. Witnesses are required to join the due process hearing by computer and appear by videoconference unless they do not have the necessary computer equipment. If a witness does not have the necessary equipment, the ALJ may permit the witnesses to appear by audio only or by telephone.
“Audio only” means using a computer without video. A witness’s inability to attend the hearing by videoconference will be discussed at the start of the hearing.
The parties are responsible for producing their own witnesses unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ. Parties shall make witnesses under their control reasonably available. The parties must schedule their witnesses to avoid delays in the hearing and to minimize or eliminate the need for calling witnesses out of order.
The ALJ has discretion to limit the number of witnesses and the time allowed for testimony. Education Code, section 56505.1, subdivision (h), empowers the ALJ to set a reasonable limit on the length of the hearing after consideration of four factors. The first two factors are the issues to be heard and the complexity of facts to be proven. The second two factors are the ability of the parties or their representatives to present their respective cases and the parties’ estimates of the time needed to present their cases.
MEET AND CONFER
The parties are encouraged to review and shorten their witness and exhibit lists before the hearing. Evidence may be excluded if it is repetitive, cumulative, or insufficiently probative to justify the time it would take to hear.
The parties are ordered to meet and confer no later than March 17, 2023, at 5:00 PM to discuss scheduling witnesses and how much time each witness will take. The parties shall discuss any issues related to counsel and witnesses appearing by videoconference for hearing, electronically viewing exhibits during the hearing, and subpoenas, if any. The parties should attempt to eliminate duplicate exhibits from their hearing exhibits. The parties shall discuss whether they can produce a written stipulation as to pertinent facts, contentions, resolutions and the authenticity and admissibility of documents to shorten the length of time needed for the hearing.
As part of the meet and confer process, Clovis shall inform Student which proposed witnesses are District employees. Clovis shall also identify the witnesses on Student’s list that require a subpoena. Clovis may agree to accept service for a witness under Clovis’ control or provide Student with the witness’s most recent contact information.
At the PHC, Student requested for Clovis to respond to Student’s email requesting confirmation that the listed witnesses were district employees. Clovis agreed to respond to Student’s email and inform Student if the listed witnesses are district employees by 5:00 PM on March 14, 2023.
PARTICIPANT INFORMATION FORM
Both parties have an ongoing obligation to ensure that OAH has current information on the Participant Information Form filed with OAH and shall file an updated Form as necessary. The Participant Information Form is not served upon the opposing party. The ongoing obligation to ensure that the Participant Information Form filed with OAH is current does not change the parties’ statutory obligation to timely disclose their witnesses to the other party(s) at least five business days prior to hearing.
The parties must file an updated Participant Information Form to inform OAH of any changes, additions, or deletions, including the required information no later than 5:00 PM at least two business days before the first day of hearing.
Any contact information provided shall be used for the limited purpose of issuing subpoenas or for contacting a witness to attend the hearing. Any contact information shall not be disclosed to any other person.
EVIDENCE PRESENTATION
In an administrative proceeding, the burden of proof is ordinarily on the party requesting the hearing. (Schaffer v. Weast (2005) 546 U.S. 49, 62.) In this case Student requested the hearing and bears the burden of proof. Student’s case-in-chief shall be presented first, followed by Clovis, unless otherwise ordered.
WITNESS LISTS
The parties must provide a joint proposed witness list to the ALJ on the first day of hearing. The list should include the first and last name of the witness, which party is calling the witness to testify, and include dates and time estimates of each witness’s expected testimony. In the event an agreement cannot be reached, each party shall prepare a separate written list. Student must have witnesses available in case there is no agreement.
At the beginning of the hearing, the ALJ and the parties will discuss the length of time anticipated for each witness and scheduling issues for individual witnesses. The ALJ will finalize the witness schedule. Parties must be prepared at the end of each day to discuss the witnesses to be presented the next day and the estimated time for the testimony of each witness.
SCOPE OF WITNESS EXAMINATION
Each witness will be called to testify only once, except for rebuttal purposes. All parties must examine a witness on all issues when the witness is first called to testify.
Requiring a witness to appear only once takes priority over the order in which parties present their case-in-chief.
AUDIO ONLY OR TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY
Whether a witness may appear by audio only or telephone instead of videoconference is a matter within the discretion of the ALJ. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, § 3082, subd. (g).) Any party seeking to present a witness by audio only or telephone shall request permission to do so before the hearing. Any party seeking to present a witness who cannot access exhibits electronically must inform the ALJ at the beginning of the hearing.
ELECTRONIC RECORDINGS
AUDIO RECORDING
A party may request permission to make an audio recording of the hearing.
Permission to make an audio recording is subject to the ALJ’s discretion and based upon the following conditions:
1. the OAH recording is the only official recording;
2. the parties shall turn their recording device on and off at the same time
that the ALJ is on and off the record to avoid recording conversations while off the record;
3. operation of the party’s recording mechanism will not be allowed to delay
the hearing;
4. a party’s recording may not be given, provided or played to a witness, or
potential witness;
5. the recording is subject to the same confidentiality as the due process
hearing; and
6. participants shall not take screenshots of the videoconference nor share or
publish any portion of the videoconference or audio recording.
Student’s and Clovis’ requests to make an audio recording of the hearing is granted.
VIDEO RECORDING
No party, witness or anyone else may videorecord any part of the proceedings or stream live through any means.
RECORDINGS AS EXHIBITS
Recordings may not be uploaded electronically without the ALJ’s permission. The ALJ has discretion to admit or exclude evidence in the form of a recording. Any request to submit a recording shall be considered at the time of hearing.
The ALJ may grant or deny the request or grant the request subject to certain conditions. The party offering the recording must establish that all or a part of the recording is relevant. The ALJ may request a transcript of the portion of the recording requested or have the party offering the recording to provide an exact identifiable portion of the recording the party seeks to admit. The identities of any person speaking on the portion of the tape being introduced must be established. An ALJ may allow the opposing party to offer additional portions of a recording to establish the context, or to rebut, the recording.
COMPENSATORY EDUCATION OR REIMBURSEMENT
Any party seeking reimbursement for expenditures shall present admissible evidence of these expenditures, or a stipulation to the amount of the expenditures. A party seeking compensatory education should provide evidence regarding the type, amount, duration, and need for any requested compensatory education. Documents offered as evidence to support a request for reimbursement must be separated by vendor.
MOTIONS
BRIEFING ON WHETHER AN EXPEDITED ISSUE WAS PLED IN STUDENT’S
COMPLAINT
At the PHC, Student stated that truancy was the violation of the code of student conduct for which Student was subject to an impermissible change of placement.
Student also argued that the facts in paragraphs 15, 53, and 56, of Student’s complaint gave Clovis notice of facts that Student was entitled to protections of 20 U.S.C. 1415(k).
At the PHC, the undersigned gave Student and Clovis an opportunity to file written briefs to argue whether the single expedited issue alleged herein met the statutory requirements to proceed as an expedited hearing. However, upon further reflection of the arguments made at the PHC, the undersigned finds that the issue as clarified during the PHC meets the threshold requiring an expedited hearing to be held. The issue of whether truancy meets the criteria for be a violation of the code of conduct is a mixed question of law and fact that requires an evidentiary expedited due process hearing.
Additionally, Student’s complaint contains sufficient facts to put Clovis on notice that Student intended to allege Clovis had a basis of knowledge that Student was a child with a disability. As a result, the undersigned reconsiders and vacates the briefing schedule ordered during the PHC. However, no pre-hearing finding is made regarding whether habitual truancy can be a violation of a code of student conduct. The parties are permitted, but not required, to submit their written briefs regarding that legal point on the first day of hearing.
CRESCENT VIEW PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL MOTION TO UNEXPEDITE
On March 7, 2023, Crescent View filed with OAH a motion to unexpedite.
Crescent View argued that the complaint should be unexpedited with respect to it because the complaint lacks facts, issues, and proposed resolutions required for an expedited hearing. OAH did not receive a written response to the motion to unexpediate. At the PHC, Student stated that he is not alleging an expedited claim involving Crescent View.
APPLICABLE LAW
A parent of a child with a disability who disagrees with any decision by a school district regarding a change in educational placement of the child based upon a violation of a code of student conduct, or who disagrees with a manifestation determination made by the district, may request and is entitled to receive an expedited due process hearing. (20 U.S.C. § 1415(k)(3)(A); 34 C.F.R. § 300.532(a) (2006), All subsequent references to the Code of Federal Regulations are to the 2006 version.) An expedited due process hearing before OAH must occur within 20 school days of the date the complaint requesting the hearing is filed. (20 U.S.C. § 1415(k)(4)(B); 34 C.F.R. § 300.532(c)(2).) The procedural right to an expedited due process hearing is mandatory and does not authorize OAH to make exceptions or grant continuances of expedited matters. (Ibid.) A matter can only be unexpedited or continued if no issue is alleged that is subject to an expedited hearing, if the student withdraws the issues in the complaint that triggered the expedited hearing, or if the student elects to challenge the change of placement under title 20, section 1415, subdivision (b)(6)(A) and not subdivision (k).
(Molina v. Bd. of Educ. of Los Lunas Schools (D.N.M. 2016) 157 F.Supp.3d 1064, 1068- 1071.)
DISCUSSION
Student’s single expedited claim is alleged against Clovis. As a result, Crescent View is not alleged to have been involved in the claim that will be decided in the expedited hearing. Crescent View chose to leave the expediated prehearing conference after Student stated he was not alleging expedited claims that involved Crescent View.
No orders were made for Crescent View to participate in the expedited due process hearing. Crescent View was not prohibited from attending or participating in the expedited hearing. Crescent View remains a respondent in the non-expedited due process hearing. Crescent View’s request to unexpedite is denied as the single expedited claim shall proceed involving Clovis.
No other prehearing motions are pending or contemplated. Any motion that was not filed three business days before the PHC, shall be supported by a declaration under penalty of perjury establishing good cause why the motion was not timely filed.
STIPULATIONS
Stipulations to pertinent facts, contentions, resolutions and authenticity and admissibility of documents are encouraged. Any proposed stipulation shall be submitted to the assigned ALJ in writing prior to the start of the hearing.
CONDUCT OF PARTICIPANTS AND HEARING ROOM DECORUM
All participants to the videoconference should observe the same decorum as in an in-person due process hearing. Participants must conduct themselves in a professional and courteous manner at all times. Cellular phones, telephones and computer notifications must be shut off or set to silent during the hearing unless the ALJ grants permission otherwise. Participants should appear from a private location, unless otherwise ordered. Participants should take reasonable efforts to minimize background noise and maintain adequate room lighting. Use of virtual background images are at the discretion of the ALJ. Witnesses are prohibited from reading exhibits, documents, notes, text messages, telephones or computers while testifying, unless permitted to do so by the ALJ. The parties, their representative and witnesses are prohibited from passing notes to, exchanging electronic messages with, or signaling the witness in any way while the witness is testifying.
LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
A Spanish language interpreter is needed. OAH will provide the interpreter.
A party or participant in this case, such as a witness, requiring reasonable accommodation to participate in a mediation or hearing may contact OAH at (916) 263-0880, or send an email to OAHADA@dgs.ca.gov as soon as the need is known. The e-mail should have “Request for Accommodation” in the Subject Line.
Additional information concerning requests for reasonable accommodation is available on OAH’s website at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/OAH/Services/Page-Content/Office-of- Administrative-Hearings-Services-List-Folder/Request-Reasonable-Accommodations- for-OAH-Legal-Proceedings.
HEARING CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC
The hearing is closed to the public. Special education hearings are closed to the public unless Student requests the hearing to be open to the public.
SETTLEMENT
The parties are encouraged to continue working together to reach an agreement before the due process hearing. The parties shall inform OAH in writing immediately if they reach a settlement or otherwise resolve the dispute before the scheduled hearing.
In addition, if a settlement is reached within five days of the scheduled start of the due process hearing, the parties shall also inform OAH of the settlement by telephone at (916) 263-0880. At the same time, the parties should send the signature page of the signed agreement or a letter withdrawing the case to OAH by visiting OAH Secure e-file at https://www.applications.dgs.ca.gov/oah/oahsftweb.
If a full and final written settlement agreement is reached after 4:00 PM the day prior to hearing, the parties shall leave a voicemail message regarding the settlement at (916) 274-6035. The parties should also leave contact information such as cellular phone numbers of each party or counsel for each party.
Dates for hearing will not be cancelled until the letter of withdrawal or signature page of the signed agreement has been received and processed by OAH. If an agreement in principle is reached, the parties should plan to attend the scheduled hearing unless different arrangements have been agreed upon by the assigned ALJ. The assigned ALJ will check for messages before the hearing.
If the matter settles subject to board approval, in addition to a signed copy of the signature page of the settlement agreement, the parties shall provide the date of the next board meeting. The hearing dates will not be cancelled without this information.
FAILURE TO COMPLY
The failure to comply with this Order may result in the exclusion of evidence or other sanctions.
ORDER INCLUDES ALL RULINGS
This Order includes all rulings made at the prehearing conference. Any discussion and conversation not referenced in this Order is not binding on the ALJ conducting the hearing and may not be relied upon by the parties. The parties should be aware that, at hearing, the ALJ conducting the hearing has discretion to reconsider any part of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Marlo Nisperos Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings
