OAH Special Education Decisions on District-filed: implement IEP
303 decisions: student prevailed on all issues in 48, split in 75, district prevailed on all issues in 180.
Search and filter these decisions
- Student v. Etiwanda School District (consolidated)Etiwanda School District must fund $39,000 in reading intervention for a student with dyslexia; April 2025 IEP found not to offer a FAPE and cannot be implemented without parent consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 5 of 11 issues (3 in part)
- Sweetwater Union High School District v. StudentSweetwater Union may implement its 2025 IEP and conduct a mental health assessment without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. West Covina Unified School District (consolidated)West Covina Unified wins all 18 of Student's claims over its nonpublic school offer but cannot implement its May 2025 IEP without consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 19 issues
- Monrovia Unified School District v. StudentMonrovia Unified failed to prove its campus-based IEP offered a FAPE to a home-schooled ninth grader; it may not implement the IEP.Student prevailed on all issuesVanaman German LLP represented the student
- Kern High School District v. StudentKern High School District may implement a 10th grader's IEP and reassess him without parental consent after parents declined to participate.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. San Diego Unified School District (consolidated)San Diego Unified must fund 375 compensatory hours and two IEEs after failing a hard-of-hearing student on instruction and LRE.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Saddleback Valley Unified School District (consolidated)Saddleback Valley Unified need not fund three IEEs and may implement its special day class IEP offer without consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Redondo Beach Unified School District (consolidated)Redondo Beach Unified may place student at HELP Group nonpublic school without parent consent; all ten student claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Long Beach Unified School District v. StudentLong Beach Unified offered a FAPE and may move a student with autism to a co-taught class without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Escondido Union School District v. StudentEscondido Union School District may not implement its placement change without consent because no general education teacher attended IEP meetings.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Santa Rosa Academy Charter School (consolidated)Santa Rosa Academy Charter School must provide counseling, social skills training, and $12,250 in behavior services; settlement claims rejected.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 10 issues
- Student v. Monrovia Unified School District (consolidated)Monrovia Unified denied FAPE by not offering social skills training and must fund up to $3,200 in PEERS sessions.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 16 issues
- Student v. Twin Rivers Unified School District (consolidated)Twin Rivers Unified must restore $8,800 for READ Academy tuition and pay mileage; January 2024 IEP denied FAPE.Split decision: student prevailed on 6 of 7 issues (2 in part)
- Tahoe Truckee Unified School District v. StudentTahoe Truckee Unified may not implement deaf tenth grader's IEP without parent consent; ASL interpreter, speech, transportation offers denied FAPE.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Capistrano Unified School District (consolidated)Capistrano Unified may implement IEP placing first-grader in special day class without parent consent; student's LRE and aide claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- The Accelerated Schools v. StudentThe Accelerated Schools cannot implement its nonpublic school IEP over parent's objection; ALJ finds goals, services and minutes inadequate.Student prevailed on all issues
- Center Joint Unified School District v. StudentCenter Joint Unified may not place an eighth grader at a separate special education school without Parent's consent.Student prevailed on all issues
- Venture Academy v. StudentVenture Academy may implement its reduced-services IEP and reassess a sixth grader without parental consent, ALJ rules.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Ukiah Unified School District (consolidated)Ukiah Unified must fund 277 compensatory hours, an AAC assessment, and staff training; its October 2023 IEP is rejected.Split decision: student prevailed on 32 of 38 issues (1 in part)
- Conejo Valley Unified School District v. StudentConejo Valley Unified may not place a student with autism in a Texas residential center without parent consent.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Snowline Joint Unified School District (consolidated)Snowline Joint Unified prevails on every issue; a settlement waiver barred earlier claims, and its December 2023 IEP was approved.District prevailed on all issues
- Manteca Unified School District v. StudentManteca Unified may exit an eighth grader from special education without parental consent, ALJ rules after repeated assessments.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. South Sutter Charter School (consolidated)South Sutter Charter School must fund about $26,000 in private dyslexia tutoring and mileage and train staff; assessment, assistive technology, and ESY claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 10 of 15 issues (2 in part)
- Garden Grove Unified School District v. StudentGarden Grove Unified may implement a student's May 2023 IEP, including a move to a moderate-severe special day class, without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Victor Elementary School District v. StudentVictor Elementary may implement its moderate-to-severe special day class IEP without Parent's consent after ALJ finds it offered FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Santa Ana Unified School District v. StudentSanta Ana Unified may move a third grader to Rossier Park nonpublic school without parental consent; ALJ finds IEP offered FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Central Unified School District v. StudentCentral Unified may not implement 11th grader's February–March 2023 IEP without parent consent after ALJ finds multiple FAPE denials.Student prevailed on all issues
- Lemoore Union Elementary School District v. StudentLemoore Union Elementary may not implement its IEP without consent after staff unilaterally rewrote it as a new annual offer.Student prevailed on all issues
- Simi Valley Unified School District v. StudentSimi Valley Unified's October 2022 IEP moving a ninth grader from residential treatment to Phoenix School offered a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Corona-Norco Unified School District (consolidated)Corona-Norco Unified cannot move autistic seventh grader to Life Skills class over parent objection; must reconvene IEP within 30 days.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 13 issues
- Student v. Folsom-Cordova Unified School District (consolidated)Folsom-Cordova Unified may implement its moderate-to-severe special day class IEP without parent consent; all of Student's claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Carmel Unified School District (consolidated)Carmel Unified may not implement its May 2022 IEP without consent; ALJ orders 20 compensatory hours and staff LRE training.Split decision: student prevailed on 4 of 13 issues
- Riverbank Unified School District v. StudentRiverbank Unified may implement IEP moving student with cerebral palsy to a Waterford High moderate to severe special day class.District prevailed on all issues
- Fruitvale School District v. StudentFruitvale School District may not implement its May 2022 IEP without consent because of unmeasurable goals and unclear service offers.Student prevailed on all issuesVanaman German LLP represented the student
- Student v. Los Angeles Unified School District (consolidated)Los Angeles Unified must fund 450 tutoring hours and return a student to a public special day class after an improper virtual placement.Split decision: student prevailed on 10 of 20 issues
- Hanford Elementary School District v. StudentHanford Elementary may not implement third-grader's IEP without parent consent; ALJ finds participation violation and unclear accommodations.Student prevailed on all issues
- Fallbrook Union Elementary School District v. StudentFallbrook Union Elementary's IEP offered a FAPE; a trained health technician, not a one-to-one nurse, met the student's needs.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Etiwanda School District (consolidated)Etiwanda School District offered FAPE in triennial IEP and may implement it without parent consent; all student claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Etiwanda School District (consolidated)Etiwanda School District cannot implement its December 2021 IEP; it must fund therapy hours, a physical therapy IEE, and staff training.Split decision: student prevailed on 5 of 17 issues
- Student v. Lammersville Unified School District (consolidated)Lammersville Unified must fund 127.5 hours of reading instruction and repay $1,800; its October 2021 IEP is upheld.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 15 issues (2 in part)
- Lucerne Elementary School District v. StudentLucerne Elementary may implement its IEP placing a first grader in a moderate-to-severe special day class without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Grossmont Union High School District v. StudentGrossmont Union High School District may implement IEP placing student at its MERIT therapeutic school without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Lakeport Unified School District v. StudentLakeport Unified may not implement IEP moving student to regional program; communication goals, services, and device were missing.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Bonita Unified School District (consolidated)Bonita Unified's triennial IEP offered a FAPE, but its distance learning denied FAPE; up to $18,000 in compensatory services ordered.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 9 issues
- Pivot Charter School – San Diego v. StudentPivot Charter School – San Diego may not implement its November 2020 IEP over parents' objection; offer was unclear and unproven.Student prevailed on all issues
- Cucamonga School District v. StudentCucamonga School District may implement its autism program placement without parent consent; ALJ finds October 2020 IEP offered FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Rocklin Unified School District (consolidated)Rocklin Unified may not implement its 2020 IEP without consent because its placement and occupational therapy offers were unclear.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- Student v. Panama-Buena Vista Union School District (consolidated)Panama-Buena Vista Union must provide 211.5 compensatory hours for assessment failures; its behavior assessment and IEP offer upheld.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 3 issues (1 in part)
- Student v. Upland Unified School District (consolidated)Upland Unified wins every decided issue; adult student's eligibility lapsed after mother withheld triennial consent; two district claims not reached.District prevailed on all issues
- Plumas Lake Elementary School District v. StudentPlumas Lake Elementary may implement a kindergartner's speech IEP without parental consent; ALJ finds no need for a device-based goal.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Norris School District (consolidated)Norris School District must fund 200 hours of compensatory services, but may implement its January 2020 special day class IEP.Split decision: student prevailed on 7 of 9 issues (6 in part)
- Student v. Bakersfield City School District (consolidated)Bakersfield City must fund two IEEs and compensatory tutoring, counseling and social skills for a kindergartner; mental health assessment upheld.Split decision: student prevailed on 6 of 8 issues
- Poway Unified School District v. StudentPoway Unified's May 2019 IEP continuing a nonpublic school placement at TERI offered FAPE; district may implement it without consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Greenfield Union School District v. StudentGreenfield Union may implement its August 2019 IEP without Parent's consent after ALJ finds the offer provided FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Greenfield Union School District v. StudentGreenfield Union may implement its August 2019 IEP without parent consent after ALJ finds it offered FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Alta Loma Elementary School District v. StudentAlta Loma Elementary's May 2019 IEP placing a student with autism in a County autism class offered a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Oakland Unified School District (consolidated)Oakland Unified may place student in a special day class but owes weekly tutoring for delaying its due process filing.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 14 issues
- Colton Unified School District v. StudentColton Unified's triennial assessments were appropriate and its general education IEP offered FAPE; no IEEs at public expense.District prevailed on all issues
- San Francisco Unified School District v. StudentSan Francisco Unified may not implement its SOAR Academy IEP without parent consent because the offer was unclear.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Lompoc Unified School District (consolidated)Lompoc Unified denied FAPE through inadequate behavior supports, a flawed speech assessment, and an involuntary transfer; 240 compensatory hours ordered.Split decision: student prevailed on 5 of 9 issues
- Student v. Pleasant Valley School District et al. (consolidated)Pleasant Valley School District and Ventura County Office of Education win all issues; district may implement 2019 IEP without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Aspire Public Schools v. StudentAspire Public Schools may stop curb-to-curb transportation for an autistic kindergartner; its IEP with a curbside aide offers a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Coronado Unified School District v. StudentCoronado Unified may implement IEP moving student from residential treatment to home while keeping his nonpublic school placement.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Aveson Global Leadership Academy (consolidated)Aveson Global Leadership Academy must repay $32,613 in nonpublic school tuition and therapy, plus mileage, over child find delays and missing behavior services.Split decision: student prevailed on 4 of 16 issues
- Student v. Burbank Unified School District (consolidated)Burbank Unified must reimburse $36,910.17 for private preschool and speech therapy; general education and full-time aide claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 20 of 57 issues (6 in part)
- Glendora Unified School District v. StudentGlendora Unified's IEP offers of special education core classes and later home instruction provided a FAPE in the least restrictive environment.District prevailed on all issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified may not implement its August 2018 IEP without parent consent; ALJ finds three procedural violations.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Middletown Unified School District (consolidated)Middletown Unified must reimburse Anova private school costs and fund more placement; its cognitive and academic assessments were upheld.Split decision: student prevailed on 5 of 11 issues
- Lucia Mar Unified School District v. StudentLucia Mar Unified fails to prove its fall 2018 IEP for a 20-year-old offered a FAPE; the IEP cannot be implemented without Parent's consent.Student prevailed on all issues
- River Springs Charter School v. StudentRiver Springs Charter School's homeschool IEP offer denied FAPE, but the charter may reassess the student without parental consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- Capistrano Unified School District v. StudentCapistrano Unified may place a nonverbal ninth grader with autism in the county Special Schools program without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Escondido Union School District v. StudentEscondido Union wins on both issues: its psychoeducational assessment stands without an IEE, and its IEP may be implemented.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Temple City Unified School District (consolidated)Temple City Unified cannot implement unclear 2018 IEP and must offer special day class with specified mainstreaming; current placement continues meanwhile.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issuesVanaman German LLP represented the student
- Bellflower Unified School District v. StudentBellflower Unified fails to prove its February 2018 initial IEP offered FAPE; the IEP cannot be implemented without parent consent.Student prevailed on all issues
- Carlsbad Unified School District v. StudentCarlsbad Unified's July 2018 IEP offered a fifth grader with a reading disability a FAPE; district may implement it without consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Milpitas Unified School District v. StudentMilpitas Unified may not implement its 2018 IEP without consent after holding meetings without the parent and making an unclear offer.Student prevailed on all issues
- Berkeley Unified School District v. StudentBerkeley Unified may not implement its nonpublic school IEP without parent consent; unmeasurable, outdated goals defeated its FAPE claim.Student prevailed on all issues
- William S. Hart Union High School District v. StudentHart Union High School District fails to prove its IEP offered FAPE; request to implement aide over parent objection denied.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Poway Unified School District (consolidated)Poway Unified's nonpublic school offer was appropriate but denied FAPE for lack of school details; student's three claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 4 issues
- Student v. Irvine Unified School District (consolidated)Irvine Unified must reimburse over $21,000 in Prentice School, tutoring and assessment costs after improperly modifying a student's curriculum.Split decision: student prevailed on 18 of 68 issues (5 in part)
- Los Alamitos Unified School District v. StudentLos Alamitos Unified may not implement a triennial IEP without consent after excluding parents and relying on flawed assessments.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Springs Charter Schools, also known as River Springs Charter School (consolidated)River Springs Charter must provide 128 hours of compensatory instruction, but its offer of placement at Flabob Academy is upheld as FAPE.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 12 issues
- Student v. Garden Grove Unified School District (consolidated)Garden Grove Unified's triennial IEP offered FAPE and may be implemented; district's request to finish assessments without consent denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 8 issues
- Student v. Del Mar Union School District (consolidated)Del Mar Union must repay a $3,500 private assessment and fund 80 therapy hours; residential placement reimbursement denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 12 issues (3 in part)
- Alhambra Unified School District v. StudentAlhambra Unified may implement its high school special day class offer without parent consent despite unclear service entries.District prevailed on all issues
- Summit Public Schools-Denali v. StudentSummit Public Schools-Denali may not assess without consent through a "diagnostic placement" or implement its June 2018 IEP.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. San Diego Unified School District (consolidated)San Diego Unified wins on all issues and may implement a ninth grader's February 2018 IEP without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Menifee Union School District v. StudentMenifee Union may reassess a medically fragile student without consent and implement its December 2017 IEP over parent objection.District prevailed on all issues
- Chaffey Joint Union High School District v. StudentChaffey Joint Union High School District may place a student with autism at Bliss Academy without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- John Swett Unified School District v. StudentJohn Swett Unified cannot implement its February 2018 IEP without consent after holding an IEP meeting without the parent.Student prevailed on all issues
- Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District v. StudentNorwalk-La Mirada Unified may implement its special day class IEP offer for a first grader without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Tahoe Truckee Unified School District v. StudentTahoe Truckee Unified failed to prove its split California-Nevada IEP offered FAPE but may assess the deaf student without consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- Gilroy Unified School District v. StudentGilroy Unified may reassess a student with autism without consent but cannot implement its piecemeal, unfinished IEP offer.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- San Marcos Unified School District v. StudentSan Marcos Unified may implement its high school IEP without parental consent after the ALJ found it offered a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Fountain Valley Unified School District (consolidated)Fountain Valley must fund 105.5 hours of one-to-one instruction and reimburse $2,697.50; autism eligibility and goals claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 7 issues
- Student v. San Diego Unified School District (consolidated)San Diego Unified must reimburse a year of nonpublic school tuition and transportation after failing to implement a consented IEP.Split decision: student prevailed on 7 of 19 issues
- Colton Joint Unified School District v. StudentColton Joint Unified may place an eighth grader at a nonpublic school and reassess him without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Sacramento City Unified School District v. StudentSacramento City Unified fails to prove its May 2017 IEP offered FAPE because incomplete assessments left goals without accurate baselines.Student prevailed on all issues
- Oakland Unified School District v. StudentOakland Unified may implement IEP placing third grader at Highland Academy without parent consent; placement held least restrictive environment.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Riverside Unified School District (consolidated)Riverside Unified prevails on all issues; ALJ finds December 2016 IEP offered FAPE and may be implemented without consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Chaffey Joint Union High School District v. StudentChaffey Joint Union High School District's offer of out-of-state residential treatment placement upheld as a FAPE in the least restrictive environment.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Ocean View School DistrictOcean View School District prevails on all claims, including time-barred Larry P. IQ-testing claims and parent-participation claims.District prevailed on all issues
- Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District v. StudentFairfield-Suisun Unified may move a hard-of-hearing student with intellectual disability to a functional academics class without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. San Dieguito Union High School District (consolidated)San Dieguito Union High School District's May 2016 transition IEP offered FAPE; district may implement it without parents' consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Barstow Unified School District v. StudentBarstow Unified may implement IEP placing student at an out-of-state residential treatment center without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. East Whittier City School District (consolidated)East Whittier City School District must keep kindergartner in general education with added supports; special day class offer rejected.Student prevailed on all issuesVanaman German LLP represented the student
- Ontario-Montclair School District v. StudentOntario-Montclair School District may implement its October 2016 IEP placing a third grader with autism in a special day class.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Alhambra Unified School District (consolidated)Alhambra Unified prevails on all issues; ALJ upholds its non-diploma functional program offer and its speech and OT assessments.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Temecula Valley Unified School District (consolidated)Temecula Valley Unified must fund a year of nonpublic school tuition and 36 hours of OT, but its 2016 special day class offer is upheldSplit decision: student prevailed on 10 of 68 issues
- Student v. Los Angeles Unified School District (consolidated)Los Angeles Unified's general education STEM magnet offer for an eighth grader with autism upheld; all of the parent's claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Big Pine Unified School District v. StudentBig Pine Unified may implement IEP placing sixth grader in out-of-state residential treatment program without Mother's consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Elk Grove Unified School District v. StudentElk Grove Unified may implement its IEP moving a fifth grader with autism to a self-contained class without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Bonsall Unified School District (consolidated)Bonsall Unified must reimburse $44,838.69 for Arch Academy tuition and transportation and cannot implement its 2016 IEP without consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 6 of 13 issues (3 in part)
- Student v. Tehachapi Unified School DistrictTehachapi Unified prevails on claims over an ABA-trained aide and BCBA supervision following an earlier OAH decision.District prevailed on all issues
- Garvey School District v. StudentGarvey School District may implement its October 2016 IEP without parent consent after an ALJ found it offered a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Anaheim City School District (consolidated)Anaheim City School District cannot implement its vague placement offer without consent, but Student's three FAPE claims are denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 4 issues
- Dublin Unified School District v. StudentDublin Unified may not replace a nonpublic agency aide with a district aide without proving its whole IEP offers a FAPE.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Huntington Beach City School District (consolidated)Huntington Beach City School District must reimburse $32,755 for child find and 2015 IEP failures; its 2016 IEP upheld.Split decision: student prevailed on 5 of 7 issues
- Lodi Unified School District v. StudentLodi Unified may implement its May 2016 IEP, including a plan to fade one-to-one behavior services, without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Pleasant Valley School District (consolidated)Pleasant Valley School District may keep an eight-year-old in a moderate to severe special day class over parents' objection.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Dehesa School District et al. (consolidated)Dehesa School District and Community Montessori Charter must reimburse $20,709 in private school tuition and fund 68 hours of services.Split decision: student prevailed on 10 of 14 issues (1 in part)
- Student v. Soledad Unified School District (consolidated)Soledad Unified may not implement its September 2016 IEP without consent and must fund 25 hours of math tutoring.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Bassett Unified School District (consolidated)Bassett Unified defeats Student's predetermination and placement claims, but its April 2016 IEP offer is found to deny FAPE on procedural grounds and cannot be implemented without parental consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 3 issues
- Baldwin Park Unified School District v. StudentBaldwin Park Unified may move a student with an intellectual disability to a moderate/severe class without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Murrieta Valley Unified School District v. StudentMurrieta Valley Unified may place third grader in Monte Vista behavioral class without parent consent, ALJ rules.District prevailed on all issues
- Clovis Unified School District v. StudentClovis Unified may place an eighth grader with an intellectual disability in a special day class for academics without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. River Springs Charter School (consolidated)River Springs Charter School must fund The Prentice School tuition, a fall 2016 semester there, and a $5,250 IEE.Split decision: student prevailed on 10 of 11 issues (3 in part)
- Student v. Capistrano Unified School District (consolidated)Capistrano Unified denied FAPE by holding an annual IEP meeting without the parent on one day's notice; transportation claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 5 issues
- Student v. Downey Unified School District (consolidated)Downey Unified denied FAPE by omitting motor goals, physical therapy and sensory supports; behavior aide change upheld.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. San Diego Unified School District (consolidated)San Diego Unified may place an eight-year-old with autism in a moderate/severe special day class over parental objection.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Westminster School District (consolidated)Westminster School District's May 2015 IEP offered a FAPE, but its October 2015 amendment, made without an IEP meeting, denied FAPE.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 9 issues
- Student v. Torrance Unified School DistrictTorrance Unified must fund 23 hours of compensatory education and train staff; Student loses placement, transportation and IEE claims.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 5 issues
- San Bruno Park Unified School District v. StudentSan Bruno Park Unified's July 2015 kindergarten IEP, with full inclusion and a full-time aide, offered FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Huntington Beach City School District (consolidated)Huntington Beach City School District's IEP offer and psychoeducational assessment upheld; no IEE at public expense for student.District prevailed on all issues
- Tustin Unified School District v. StudentTustin Unified may not implement kindergarten IEP over parents' objection; its partial special day class placement was not the least restrictive environment.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Glendale Unified School District (consolidated)Glendale Unified offered a FAPE in both years; parents' claims denied, and district may implement its 2015 IEP without consent.District prevailed on all issuesVanaman German LLP represented the student
- Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District v. StudentPalos Verdes Peninsula Unified's offer of residential treatment for an adult student was a FAPE in the least restrictive environment.District prevailed on all issues
- Oakland Unified School District v. StudentOakland Unified may not implement its March 2015 residential placement IEP because the offer was unclear and unsupported by evidence.Student prevailed on all issues
- Vista Unified School District v. StudentVista Unified may not implement its January 2015 IEP without parent consent; the IEP met procedural rules but did not offer FAPE.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- Rim of the World Unified School District v. StudentRim of the World Unified may implement its January 2015 IEP without parent consent; a male aide and mountain biking were not required.District prevailed on all issues
- Torrance Unified School District v. StudentTorrance Unified's middle school IEP denied a FAPE because it offered no after-school transportation to a student with autism.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Snowline Joint Unified School District (consolidated)Snowline Joint Unified's offer of an out-of-state residential placement was the least restrictive environment; all of Student's claims were denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Downey Unified School District (consolidated)Downey Unified must reimburse $9,324.80 for summer Lindamood-Bell after an unclear 2013 ESY offer; all other claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 26 issues (1 in part)
- Vista Unified School District v. StudentVista Unified may implement its May 2014 IEP placing a student with autism at Stein Education Center over parents' objections.District prevailed on all issues
- Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District v. StudentSanta Monica-Malibu Unified may place a tenth grader at Linden Center nonpublic school without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Desert Sands Unified School District v. StudentDesert Sands Unified's 2013 IEP denied FAPE by dropping adapted PE and omitting OT; home instruction and reassessment upheld.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 3 issues
- Student v. Fresno Unified School District (consolidated)Fresno Unified must fund 55 months of individualized compensatory education through EvoLibri for a 22-year-old denied FAPE for 39 months.Split decision: student prevailed on 11 of 14 issues
- Student v. Twin Rivers Unified School District (consolidated)Twin Rivers Unified must provide 34 hours of compensatory behavior services; its special day class offer may be implemented.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 4 issues
- Capistrano Unified School District v. StudentCapistrano Unified's offer of a behavior intervention classroom at Wood Canyon Middle School upheld as a FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Magnolia Elementary School District v. StudentMagnolia Elementary School District's triennial assessment and nonpublic school IEP offer upheld; district may implement the IEP.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Newport-Mesa Unified School District (consolidated)Newport-Mesa Unified's triennial assessment and special day class IEP offer upheld; district may implement IEP without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Burbank Unified School District v. StudentBurbank Unified may place a 9-year-old with autism at Five Acres therapeutic nonpublic school without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- San Mateo-Foster City School District v. StudentSan Mateo-Foster City School District may not implement its 2013 IEP offer because no teachers attended key IEP meetings.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Huntington Beach Union High School District et al. (consolidated)Huntington Beach Union High may place student at a locked Utah treatment center; all claims against both districts denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Temecula Valley Unified School District (consolidated)Temecula Valley Unified must fund up to 50 counseling hours and an OT assessment; it may assess mental health without consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 13 issues (1 in part)
- Student v. San Marcos Unified School District (consolidated)San Marcos Unified may place student in high school special day classes; ALJ denies all of Student's claims.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Hemet Unified School District (consolidated)Hemet Unified's May 2013 preschool special day class offer upheld, but it cannot implement its January 2014 offer.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 4 issues
- Long Beach Unified School District v. StudentLong Beach Unified's September 2013 IEP offered a FAPE, and the district may implement it without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- San Leandro Unified School District v. StudentSan Leandro Unified may place a third grader in its counseling enriched class at Roosevelt Elementary without Mother's consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Fresno Unified School District (consolidated)Fresno Unified denied a 22-year-old student a FAPE from October 2010 onward; ALJ orders assessments before deciding compensatory education.Split decision: student prevailed on 12 of 16 issues
- Student v. Las Virgenes Unified School District (consolidated)Las Virgenes Unified offered FAPE in its Social Communication Program; parents' request for an IEE and continued nonpublic school placement denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Clovis Unified School District v. StudentClovis Unified's 2013 IEP offer for an eighth grader with intellectual disability, as revised by prior written notice, upheld as FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Tustin Unified School District (consolidated)Tustin Unified may implement IEP moving medically fragile student from county program to Currie Middle School; Student's claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Manteca Unified School District (consolidated)Manteca Unified wins all issues and may place student at Children's Home of Stockton without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Irvine Unified School District v. StudentIrvine Unified's moderate/severe special day class offer for a kindergartner with autism upheld; district may implement IEP without consent.District prevailed on all issues
- San Dieguito Union High School District v. StudentSan Dieguito Union High School District's speech and PT assessments and nonpublic school IEP offer upheld; no IEEs owed.District prevailed on all issues
- Oakland Unified School District v. StudentOakland Unified may implement its full-time school IEP over a parent's objection, but cannot contact the student's doctors without her consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- Student v. Fresno Unified School District (consolidated)Fresno Unified's assessments upheld and parents' IEP claims denied, but its four-school placement offer cannot be implemented.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 7 issues
- Aspire Public Schools v. StudentAspire Public Schools may not implement an IEP written at a meeting held without parents after Mother asked to reschedule.Student prevailed on all issues
- Fresno Unified School District v. StudentFresno Unified may reassess a 21-year-old without consent and implement its IEP; services may end if parents refuse to cooperate with reassessment.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 3 issues (1 in part)
- Student v. Baldwin Park Unified School District et al. (consolidated)Baldwin Park and Covina Valley Unified need not refer a deaf student to the California School for the Deaf; 2012 IEP upheld.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Redlands Unified School District (consolidated)Redlands Unified prevails on all issues; assessments, IEPs, and behavior support plans upheld and June 2012 IEP offered FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. El Centro Elementary School District (consolidated)El Centro Elementary must provide 15 hours of compensatory occupational therapy; its special day class offers are upheld.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 10 issues (1 in part)
- Manhattan Beach Unified School District v. StudentManhattan Beach Unified's offer of residential treatment at Devereaux in Texas was a FAPE and may be implemented without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Manhattan Beach Unified School District v. StudentManhattan Beach Unified offered FAPE with in-school aide and its own behavior analyst, and ESY was not required; district may implement IEPs.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Lucia Mar Unified School District (consolidated)Lucia Mar Unified prevails on all issues; its February 2012 IEP, with special day class and revised behavior plan, offered FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Garden Grove Unified School District (consolidated)Garden Grove Unified wins on all issues: 2009 claims fail and its 2011 nonpublic school offer is found to provide FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (consolidated)Santa Monica-Malibu Unified prevails on all issues; its autism-focused class at Grant Elementary with a full-day aide offered FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Cloverdale Unified School District v. StudentCloverdale Unified's December 2011 IEP offering a special day class placement provided FAPE and may be implemented without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Fountain Valley School District (consolidated)Fountain Valley School District's kindergarten IEP and behavior plan offered FAPE; parents' private school reimbursement claim denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified's June 2011 general education kindergarten IEP for a student with autism offered a FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Ocean View School District (consolidated)Ocean View School District's July 2011 IEP with a district-run ABA program offered FAPE; parents' predetermination and eligibility claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified's May 2011 IEP offering an auditory/oral deaf and hard-of-hearing class at Melrose offered FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Carlsbad Unified School District v. StudentCarlsbad Unified's IEP replacing an agency aide with a District aide offered FAPE and may be implemented without consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Oak Park Unified School District v. StudentOak Park Unified's June 2011 IEP offered a FAPE; district may implement it without consent if student enrolls.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Baldwin Park Unified School District (consolidated)Baldwin Park Unified denied FAPE by failing to assess and support a 6-year-old's behavior; placement and other claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 11 issues (1 in part)
- Student v. Victor Valley Union High School District et al. (consolidated)Victor Valley Union High must keep student partly mainstreamed and conduct a new behavior assessment; most of 55 claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 6 of 89 issues
- Del Mar Union School District v. StudentDel Mar Union may place third grader in Torrey Hills special day class; offer found to provide FAPE in least restrictive environment.District prevailed on all issues
- San Dieguito Union High School District v. StudentSan Dieguito Union High School District's nonpublic school offer provided a FAPE; residential placement not required.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Los Angeles Unified School District (consolidated)Los Angeles Unified may move a fifth grader from full inclusion to a special day class; ALJ finds FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Fullerton Unified School District v. StudentFullerton Unified may not implement its 2011-2012 IEP without consent after predetermining a school change for a student with autism.Student prevailed on all issues
- San Ramon Valley Unified School District v. StudentSan Ramon Valley Unified may implement its middle school special day class IEP offer without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Whittier City School District v. StudentWhittier City School District may implement IEP placing student in a special day class without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Palo Alto Unified School District v. StudentPalo Alto Unified may implement its IEP removing a third grader's one-to-one aide; ALJ orders preferential seating added.District prevailed on all issues
- Palm Springs Unified School District v. StudentPalm Springs Unified may implement a student's IEP and behavior plan without parental consent despite parents' homework objection.District prevailed on all issues
- Newport-Mesa Unified School District v. StudentNewport-Mesa Unified's March 2011 IEP moving a fifth grader with autism to a special day class offered FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Alta Loma School District et al. (consolidated)Alta Loma School District must fund OT, APE and AT independent evaluations; IEPs upheld and Lindamood-Bell reimbursement denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 17 issues
- Garden Grove Unified School District v. StudentGarden Grove Unified offered a FAPE in its June 2010 IEP and may implement the nonpublic school placement without guardian consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Twin Rivers Unified School District v. StudentTwin Rivers Unified may not implement its January 2011 IEP without consent after ALJ finds predetermination and denied parent participation.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Palo Alto Unified School District (consolidated)Palo Alto Unified must add monthly job coaching and train staff after IEP lapses; its 2011 functional skills IEP is upheld.Split decision: student prevailed on 5 of 35 issues (2 in part)
- Tracy Unified School District et al. v. StudentTracy Unified and San Joaquin County Office of Education win: their autism special day class offer provided a FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Riverside Unified School District v. StudentRiverside Unified's offer of nonpublic school placement at Somerset upheld as a FAPE in the least restrictive environment.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Jefferson Union High School District (consolidated)Jefferson Union High must provide 456 compensatory hours; ALJ rejects its therapeutic day school offer as a denial of FAPE.Split decision: student prevailed on 27 of 43 issues (8 in part)
- Bakersfield City School District v. StudentBakersfield City School District offered FAPE, including SEAL Center placement, and may reassess the student without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. StudentLa Mesa-Spring Valley School District fails to prove its general education placement offer with resource support provides FAPE.Student prevailed on all issues
- Moreno Valley Unified School District v. StudentMoreno Valley Unified's offer of a functional skills program offered a 21-year-old with autism FAPE; Mother must allow OT assessment.District prevailed on all issues
- Newport-Mesa Unified School District v. StudentNewport-Mesa Unified may place a 16-year-old in a moderate-to-severe special day class at Estancia High without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Redondo Beach Unified School District (consolidated)Redondo Beach Unified prevails: its OT assessment stands, and its Essential Skills IEP offer may be implemented without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Encinitas Unified School District v. StudentEncinitas Unified's May 2010 IEP offering a special day class with mainstreaming provided FAPE, ALJ rules for the District.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Baldwin Park Unified School District (consolidated)Baldwin Park Unified may exit a student with ADHD from special education; ALJ finds he no longer qualifies under OHI.District prevailed on all issues
- Fullerton Elementary School District v. StudentFullerton Elementary School District's May 2010 IEP offered FAPE without home ABA services; District may implement it without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. StudentFullerton Joint Union High School District's offer of an out-of-state residential treatment center placement upheld as a FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Grossmont Union High School District v. StudentGrossmont Union High School District's offer of residential treatment placement offered FAPE in the least restrictive environment, ALJ rules.District prevailed on all issues
- Bakersfield City School District v. StudentBakersfield City School District may implement its kindergarten special day class IEP for a student with autism without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Ravenswood City School District (consolidated)Ravenswood City School District must fund three years at Stellar Academy plus 600 tutoring hours for a student with a learning disability.Split decision: student prevailed on 8 of 21 issuesVanaman German LLP represented the student
- Castro Valley Unified School District v. StudentCastro Valley Unified may implement its April 2010 IEP for a student with visual impairment without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. New Haven Unified School District (consolidated)New Haven Unified must fund a behavior assessment and 100 hours of reading and writing instruction; private school placement denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 4 of 4 issues (4 in part)
- Acalanes Union High School District v. StudentAcalanes Union High School District's IEP at Las Lomas offered a FAPE in the LRE; parents' Bayhill reimbursement claim denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Poway Unified School District v. StudentPoway Unified's August 2009 IEP offered a FAPE and may be implemented if the student returns to public school.District prevailed on all issues
- La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. StudentLa Mesa-Spring Valley School District may place a kindergartner in its behavioral special day class at La Presa Elementary.District prevailed on all issues
- Corona-Norco Unified School District v. StudentCorona-Norco Unified's March 2009 IEP offered FAPE despite parents' absence; district may implement it without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Roseville City Elementary School District v. StudentRoseville City Elementary's offer of a county-run autism class to a seventh grader was a FAPE in the LRE, ALJ rules.District prevailed on all issues
- Burbank Unified School District v. StudentBurbank Unified's assessments upheld, but its offer of a nonpublic school placement at Villa Esperanza denied a FAPE in the LRE.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- Student v. Exeter Union School District (consolidated)Exeter Union's plan to replace a nonpublic agency with its own behavior program offered a FAPE; District prevails on all issues.District prevailed on all issues
- Corona-Norco Unified School District v. StudentCorona-Norco Unified may implement its October 2008 IEP and conduct physical therapy and assistive technology assessments without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- San Ramon Valley Unified School District v. StudentSan Ramon Valley Unified's triennial assessment and moderate/severe special day class offer upheld; no public funding for parents' IEE.District prevailed on all issues
- Poway Unified School District v. StudentPoway Unified's offer of a high school special day class, replacing a long-running home program, offered FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Clovis Unified School District (consolidated)Clovis Unified prevails on all issues; its assessments are upheld and it may implement its January 2009 IEP without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Santa Ana Unified School District v. StudentSanta Ana Unified's June 2009 IEP offered a FAPE in the least restrictive environment and may be implemented without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Clovis Unified School District (consolidated)Clovis Unified's assessments and modified IEP upheld; district owes 195 compensatory hours, including 20 for missed summer ESY.Split decision: student prevailed on 4 of 21 issues (3 in part)
- Student v. Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District (consolidated)Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified's autism class offer and home-to-school transition plan provided FAPE; all of Student's claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Corona-Norco Unified School District v. StudentCorona-Norco Unified may implement its November 2008 IEP and stop funding a 13-year-old's nonpublic agency services.District prevailed on all issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified's offer of a moderate intellectual disability special day class placement for a fifth grader was upheld as FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Taft City School District v. StudentALJ finds Taft City School District's February 2009 IEP offered a FAPE, allowing implementation without consent through April 16, 2009.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. St. Helena Unified School District (consolidated)St. Helena Unified must reimburse 25 percent of private school tuition, $6,236.03, over a Life Skills class placement; other claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 7 issues (2 in part)
- Fresno Unified School District v. StudentFresno Unified fails to prove its special day class offer was the least restrictive environment; full-inclusion student stays at Duncan.Student prevailed on all issues
- Corning Union Elementary School District v. StudentCorning Union Elementary's IEP moving a student from home hospital instruction to a special day class offered a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- West Covina Unified School District v. StudentWest Covina Unified's 2008-2009 IEP did not offer a FAPE; ALJ denies district's request to implement it.Student prevailed on all issues
- San Diego Unified School District v. StudentSan Diego Unified's June 2008 IEP offering the STARS special day class at Taft Middle School provided a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Baldwin Park Unified School District (consolidated)Baldwin Park Unified must fund an audiology assessment and compensatory services; its Canyon View School offer may start in fall 2009.Split decision: student prevailed on 9 of 17 issues (1 in part)
- San Francisco Unified School District v. StudentSan Francisco Unified's offer of a special day class at El Dorado Elementary upheld as a FAPE in the least restrictive environment.District prevailed on all issues
- Sequoia Union High School District v. StudentSequoia Union High School District's offer of a special day class placement for a 15-year-old autistic student upheld as FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Murrieta Valley Unified School District v. StudentMurrieta Valley Unified's offer of a severely handicapped special day class for a kindergartner was a FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Hermosa Beach City School District (consolidated)Hermosa Beach City School District offered a FAPE; parents' claim for nonpublic school reimbursement at Summit View denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Modesto City Schools (consolidated)Modesto City Schools must fund an intensive one-to-one ABA program and repay $2,298.75 after refusing to discuss parents' placement request.Split decision: student prevailed on 5 of 14 issues
- Student v. Simi Valley Unified School District (consolidated)Simi Valley Unified prevails on every claim brought by a blind 22-year-old student; ALJ upholds her age-out exit.District prevailed on all issues
- Carlsbad Unified School District v. StudentCarlsbad Unified's 2008 general education IEP offer with learning center support offered a FAPE; district may implement it without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- San Jacinto Unified School District v. StudentSan Jacinto Unified's IEP moving a student from home instruction to high school did not offer FAPE because it lacked accommodations.Student prevailed on all issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified's nonpublic school offer for a 13-year-old with autism provided FAPE; no guaranteed female aide required.District prevailed on all issues
- Chula Vista Elementary School District v. StudentChula Vista Elementary's special day class offer was not the least restrictive environment for a first grader with language delays.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Hemet Unified School District (consolidated)Hemet Unified's autism kindergarten offer denied FAPE; district must fund the CARD in-home ABA program through 2007-2008.Split decision: student prevailed on 8 of 12 issues (1 in part)
- Yucaipa-Calimesa Joint Unified School District v. StudentYucaipa-Calimesa's June 2007 IEP offer did not provide FAPE because it inaccurately described the new autism class.Student prevailed on all issues
- San Diego Unified School District v. StudentSan Diego Unified may implement an IEP moving a 19-year-old with intellectual disability from high school to a community-based transition program.District prevailed on all issues
- Ocean View School District et al. v. StudentOcean View School District's May 2007 IEP, including general education placement, a shadow aide and ABA social skills services, offered an autistic student a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Newport-Mesa Unified School District v. StudentNewport-Mesa Unified denied FAPE by holding an IEP meeting without the parents after refusing to reschedule so their attorney could attend.Student prevailed on all issues
- Newport-Mesa Unified School District v. StudentNewport-Mesa Unified's offer to move a student from a nonpublic school to a district special day class offered FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Sierra Unified School District v. StudentSierra Unified may not move student to center-based Ramacher campus; offer denied FAPE in the LRE and was predetermined.Student prevailed on all issues
- Lancaster Elementary School District v. StudentLancaster Elementary School District's June 2007 IEP ending occupational therapy offered a FAPE; no one appeared for the student.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Capistrano Unified School District et al. (consolidated)Capistrano Unified and Orange County Department of Education prevail; Tesoro High special day class offered FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Alameda City Unified School District v. StudentAlameda Unified's June 2007 IEP offering an autism special day class and services offered a FAPE; parents did not appear.District prevailed on all issues
- Modesto City Schools v. StudentModesto City Schools may not implement its May 2007 IEP over parent's objection and must hold a new IEP meeting.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 4 issues (2 in part)
- Sierra Unified School District v. StudentSierra Unified fails to show a county-run special day class at Beth Ramacher Center was FAPE for a student with severe disabilities.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. San Diego Unified School District (consolidated)San Diego Unified's IEPs denied FAPE over G-tube feeding and transition plan gaps; assessment upheld and most claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 18 issues
- Capistrano Unified School District v. StudentCapistrano Unified's behavior support plan was upheld, but its May 2007 IEP was found to deny FAPE because of flawed behavior and transition goals.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- San Diego Unified School District v. StudentSan Diego Unified may reassess a student with a speech or language impairment and implement his speech IEP without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Temecula Valley Unified School District (consolidated)Temecula Valley Unified's emotional-disturbance special day class offered FAPE; family's request for Winston School placement denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Ocean View School District et al. v. StudentOcean View School District's ESY and 2007-2008 middle school offer found to be a FAPE after Student stipulated.District prevailed on all issues
- Paramount Unified School District v. StudentParamount Unified loses its own case: the ALJ finds its September 2006 IEP denied FAPE and orders a new IEP meeting.Student prevailed on all issues
- Manhattan Beach Unified School District v. StudentManhattan Beach Unified may reassess a second grader without parental consent and implement its October 2006 IEP.District prevailed on all issues
- Chula Vista Elementary School District v. StudentChula Vista Elementary may implement its initial IEP for a six-year-old with autism; the District prevailed on all issues.District prevailed on all issues
- Rosedale Union School District v. StudentRosedale Union's offer of a county special day class at Almondale Elementary provides FAPE in the least restrictive environment.District prevailed on all issues
- Capistrano Unified School District v. StudentCapistrano Unified's triennial reassessment and 2006 IEP offer of resource math support upheld; district prevailed on all issues.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Los Angeles Unified School District (consolidated)Los Angeles Unified must fund speech and psychoeducational IEEs after delaying its own filing; unclear behavior goal denied FAPE.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Alameda Unified School District (consolidated)Alameda Unified prevails on all issues; parents caused service gaps, and the Haight Elementary autism class offered a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Rocklin Unified School District v. StudentRocklin Unified's kindergarten IEP and eclectic teaching approach for a student with autism provided a FAPE; district prevailed on all issues.District prevailed on all issues
- Orange Unified School District v. StudentOrange Unified's 2006-2007 high school IEP offer for a ninth grader with a learning disability is upheld as a FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- San Diego Unified School District v. StudentSan Diego Unified may place a 15-year-old at Riley School and refer him for a mental health assessment without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Chula Vista Elementary School District v. StudentChula Vista Elementary's August 2006 IEP was not a FAPE because assessments were incomplete and required teachers were absent.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Hemet Unified School District (consolidated)Hemet Unified must fund six months of clinic-based OT for a late, flawed OT assessment; residential placement request denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 20 issues
- San Jacinto Unified School District v. StudentSan Jacinto Unified's IEP placing a tenth grader at Keystone nonpublic school with a behavior plan offered FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Fallbrook Union High School District v. StudentFallbrook Union High may move a 17-year-old with autism from a nonpublic school to its new on-campus special day class.District prevailed on all issues
- Glendora Unified School District v. StudentGlendora Unified cannot eliminate physical therapy or cut occupational therapy for a six-year-old with autism; offer was not a FAPE.Student prevailed on all issues
- Rosedale Union School District v. StudentRosedale Union proves student's eligibility is speech or language impairment, not autism, and its first-grade offer is a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Willits Unified School District v. StudentWillits Unified's offer of a high school special day class with a one-to-one aide was a FAPE for 2006-2007.District prevailed on all issues
- San Ramon Valley Unified School District v. StudentSan Ramon Valley Unified provided an appropriate replacement behavior provider after its nonpublic agency behaviorist became unavailable.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Byron Union School District et al. (consolidated)Byron Union School District's interim placement and IEP offers, including a separate Spectrum campus placement, upheld; all Student claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Glendale Unified School District (consolidated)Glendale Unified prevails on academic, speech, IEE, and Lindamood-Bell claims; missed 2003 occupational therapy found but no remedy ordered.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 6 issues (1 in part)
- Student v. East Whittier City School District (consolidated)East Whittier City School District's assessments upheld and special day class offer found to provide FAPE; all student claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Sylvan Union School District v. StudentSylvan Union may place a kindergartner with autism in a special day class and reassess OT, but not AT or APE.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 9 issues
- Lowell Joint School District v. StudentLowell Joint School District's 2004 and 2006 IEP offers for a preschooler with autism provided a FAPE; parents did not appear.District prevailed on all issues
- Rialto Unified School District v. StudentRialto Unified's special day class placement at Casey Elementary offered a FAPE; District may implement it over parents' objection.District prevailed on all issues
- Mount Diablo Unified School District v. StudentMount Diablo Unified's November 2005 kindergarten IEP offer for a five-year-old autistic student provided a FAPE in the LRE.District prevailed on all issues
- Poway Unified School District v. StudentPoway Unified's 2005-2006 IEP offered FAPE; a brief general education teacher attendance lapse did not deny FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Covina-Valley Unified School District v. StudentCovina-Valley Unified's special day class offer for summer 2005 and 2005-2006 upheld as a FAPE; no reimbursement owed.District prevailed on all issues
- San Ramon Valley Unified School District v. StudentSan Ramon Valley Unified's 2005 ESY and 2005-2006 offers provided FAPE; district may assess without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Poway Unified School District (consolidated)Poway Unified offered FAPE to a high school student with ADHD; parents' assessment, participation, and reimbursement claims denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Fremont Unified School District v. StudentALJ upholds Fremont Unified and California School for the Deaf offer of full-time autism special day class for deaf student.District prevailed on all issues
- Lodi Unified School District v. StudentLodi Unified's offer of an autism special day class is upheld as FAPE in the LRE over the parent's request for full inclusion.District prevailed on all issues
- San Ramon Valley Unified School District v. StudentSan Ramon Valley Unified's offers for 2004-2005, ESY 2005, and 2005-2006 are upheld as providing a FAPE.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. San Ramon Valley Unified School District (consolidated)San Ramon Valley Unified's 2005-06 IEP offer for an autistic 11th grader upheld; parent's stay put motions denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Gateway Unified School District v. StudentGateway Unified's 2005-2006 special day class offer provided FAPE; district may implement it and must fix one writing goal.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. East Whittier City Elementary School DistrictEast Whittier City Elementary must reimburse $300 for missed speech therapy, but its reduced speech offer may be implemented.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 5 issues (1 in part)
- San Diego Unified School District v. StudentSan Diego Unified may implement its off-campus TRACE transition IEP for a 21-year-old student over his mother's objection.District prevailed on all issues