OAH Special Education Decisions on District-filed: assess without consent
164 decisions: student prevailed on all issues in 14, split in 29, district prevailed on all issues in 121.
Search and filter these decisions
- Conejo Valley Unified School District v. StudentConejo Valley Unified may conduct a full initial special education assessment of a 10th grader without his parents' consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Sweetwater Union High School District v. StudentSweetwater Union may implement its 2025 IEP and conduct a mental health assessment without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Ojai Unified School District (consolidated)Ojai Unified wins every issue over a student's home hospital program and may reassess her without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Delano Joint Union High School District v. StudentDelano Joint Union High School District may reassess a high school student without parent consent under its March 2025 plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Kern High School District v. StudentKern High School District may implement a 10th grader's IEP and reassess him without parental consent after parents declined to participate.District prevailed on all issues
- Simi Valley Unified School District v. StudentSimi Valley Unified may reassess student without parent consent; request to be excused from FAPE if parent refuses denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Soledad Unified School District v. StudentSoledad Unified may not reassess a fourth grader without parental consent because its assessment plan and notices were deficient.Student prevailed on all issues
- Fremont Union High School District v. StudentFremont Union High School District may reassess a 10th grader without parent consent; its request for an advisory FAPE ruling is denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Anaheim Elementary School District v. StudentAnaheim Elementary may reassess a sixth grader without parental consent after Father refused in writing to consent to the triennial assessment plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Rosedale Union School District (consolidated)Rosedale Union must fund independent speech and psychoeducational evaluations after holding two IEP meetings without parents; may assess without consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 11 of 14 issues
- Venture Academy v. StudentVenture Academy may implement its reduced-services IEP and reassess a sixth grader without parental consent, ALJ rules.District prevailed on all issues
- Pleasanton Unified School District v. StudentPleasanton Unified may not assess without consent under flawed 2023 plan; must issue new triennial plan and train staff.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- El Segundo Unified School District v. StudentEl Segundo Unified may assess a third grader in academics, cognition, health, and social-emotional areas without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Corona-Norco Unified School District v. StudentCorona-Norco Unified may complete overdue triennial reassessments without parental consent after parents demanded conditions that would invalidate testing.District prevailed on all issues
- Hueneme Elementary School District v. StudentHueneme Elementary may reassess a student at sites it chooses, without the grandparent's conditions on location or her presence.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Mt. Diablo Unified School District (consolidated)Mt. Diablo Unified owes nine hours of compensatory education and $100 for a heated lunchbox; may conduct feeding assessment without consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 11 of 22 issues
- Student v. Magnolia Science Academy-Santa Ana (consolidated)Magnolia Science Academy-Santa Ana may reassess a student without parent consent; three-year rule applies despite disputed prior IEP.District prevailed on all issues
- Newark Unified School District v. StudentNewark Unified may reassess student without parent consent; ALJ rejects parent's objection to standardized testing.District prevailed on all issues
- Rosedale Union Elementary School District v. StudentRosedale Union Elementary may reassess an eighth grader without parental consent after parents refused to sign its triennial plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Modesto City Schools (consolidated)Modesto City Schools prevails on all 16 student claims; ALJ denies district's request to have its chosen assessor's evaluation count as an IEE.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 17 issues
- Sycamore Academy of Science and Cultural Arts, Chino Valley v. StudentSycamore Academy may conduct functional behavior and mental health assessments of an eight-year-old student without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Enterprise Elementary School District (consolidated)Enterprise Elementary must fund 104 hours of in-home services and a health IEE after its virtual-only offer denied FAPE.Student prevailed on all issues
- Murrieta Valley Unified School District v. StudentMurrieta Valley Unified may not reassess an eighth grader without consent because it made no reasonable effort to obtain Parents' informed consent.Student prevailed on all issues
- Tustin Unified School District v. StudentTustin Unified may conduct a ninth grader's triennial reassessment without one parent's consent, ALJ rules.District prevailed on all issues
- Victor Valley Union High School District v. StudentVictor Valley Union High School District may reassess a student without parental consent; its request to suspend services is denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Soledad Unified School District v. StudentSoledad Unified may finish an overdue cognitive and social-emotional reassessment of an eighth grader without further parental consent or conditions.District prevailed on all issues
- Val Verde Unified School District v. StudentVal Verde Unified may reassess a 16-year-old student, including by a school psychologist, without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Round Valley Unified School District v. StudentRound Valley Unified may conduct a triennial reassessment without parental consent; its request to be relieved of future duties is denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Chino Valley Unified School District (consolidated)Chino Valley Unified's offer addressed autistic student's pica and elopement; district may assess in person without parents' conditions.District prevailed on all issues
- Anaheim Elementary School District v. StudentAnaheim Elementary may assess a six-year-old in person without parental consent or conditions, but no physical exam without consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Corona-Norco Unified School District v. StudentCorona-Norco Unified may reassess a student with autism without parental consent; request for advisory ruling on FAPE denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Trivium Charter School v. StudentTrivium Charter School may reassess a tenth grader without parent consent; its request to compel medical releases is denied.District prevailed on all issues
- William S. Hart Union High School District v. StudentWilliam S. Hart Union High School District may reassess a ninth grader with autism without parental consent, months before his triennial review.District prevailed on all issues
- Irvine Unified School District v. StudentIrvine Unified's academic assessment is upheld with no IEE owed, and Irvine may assess without consent if the parent wants special education.District prevailed on all issues
- Los Alamitos Unified School District v. StudentLos Alamitos Unified may reassess a 17-year-old with autism without Mother's consent after Father signed the plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Upland Unified School District v. StudentUpland Unified may reassess a 14-year-old student with ADHD without parental consent under its March 2019 assessment plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Cajon Valley Union School District v. StudentCajon Valley Union may give a 12-year-old an initial special education assessment without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- River Springs Charter School v. StudentRiver Springs Charter School's homeschool IEP offer denied FAPE, but the charter may reassess the student without parental consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- Anaheim Elementary School District v. StudentAnaheim Elementary may assess a homeschooled preschooler without parental consent, but its school nurse may not perform a physical exam.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Tuolumne County Superintendent of Schools et al. (consolidated)Tuolumne County Superintendent of Schools and Curtis Creek must fund residential placement at Madison Oaks and reimburse $11,025 after broad FAPE denials.Split decision: student prevailed on 19 of 22 issues (2 in part)
- Upland Unified School District v. StudentUpland Unified may not reassess student without consent because its assessment plan was not in Parent's native Spanish.Student prevailed on all issues
- Berkeley Unified School District v. StudentBerkeley Unified may reassess a ninth grader with autism without parental consent, but may not use the Differential Ability Scales.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Garden Grove Unified School District (consolidated)Garden Grove Unified's triennial IEP offered FAPE and may be implemented; district's request to finish assessments without consent denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 8 issues
- Summit Public Schools-Denali v. StudentSummit Public Schools-Denali may not assess without consent through a "diagnostic placement" or implement its June 2018 IEP.Student prevailed on all issues
- Menifee Union School District v. StudentMenifee Union may reassess a medically fragile student without consent and implement its December 2017 IEP over parent objection.District prevailed on all issues
- Riverdale Joint Unified School District v. StudentRiverdale Joint Unified may reassess student without parental consent at locations it chooses; parents must sign medical releases.District prevailed on all issues
- Tahoe Truckee Unified School District v. StudentTahoe Truckee Unified failed to prove its split California-Nevada IEP offered FAPE but may assess the deaf student without consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- Gilroy Unified School District v. StudentGilroy Unified may reassess a student with autism without consent but cannot implement its piecemeal, unfinished IEP offer.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- Corcoran Joint Unified School District v. StudentCorcoran Joint Unified may reassess an 11-year-old student without parent consent despite parents' concerns about testing anxiety.District prevailed on all issues
- Visalia Unified School District v. StudentVisalia Unified may reassess a fifth grader with a speech or language impairment without parental consent under its December 2017 plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Vista Unified School District v. StudentVista Unified may reassess a 16-year-old student without parental consent after parents ignored repeated bilingual requests.District prevailed on all issues
- Colton Joint Unified School District v. StudentColton Joint Unified may place an eighth grader at a nonpublic school and reassess him without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Escondido Union School District (consolidated)Escondido Union prevails on all claims over behavior-emergency IEP meetings and delayed mental health and autism assessments.District prevailed on all issues
- Carlsbad Unified School District v. StudentCarlsbad Unified may reassess a 14-year-old with autism without parent consent; request for advisory FAPE order denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Upland Unified School District v. StudentUpland Unified may reassess a fourth grader without parental consent; parent cannot limit test choice or timing.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Irvine Unified School District (consolidated)Irvine Unified must repay $5,803 in private school costs and fund 120 compensatory hours after cutting a student's full-time aide to one hour a day.Student prevailed on all issues
- Fremont Unified School District v. StudentFremont Unified may reassess a 10th grader with anxiety-related attendance problems without parent consent; services may stop if Student is not produced.District prevailed on all issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified may conduct a high school student's triennial reassessment without parental consent after the parent refused the assessment plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Whittier City School District v. StudentWhittier City School District may conduct a student's triennial reassessment, including school psychologist testing, without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Vista Unified School District v. StudentVista Unified may reassess a 17-year-old student with autism without parental consent under its October 2016 assessment plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Anaheim Elementary School District v. StudentAnaheim Elementary may assess student without parental consent under its November 2016 comprehensive assessment plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Lucia Mar Unified School District v. StudentLucia Mar Unified may reassess an autistic second grader's behavior, social-emotional functioning, and health without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. San Dieguito Union High School District (consolidated)San Dieguito Union High may reassess student without consent; parents' conditions voided consent and all student claims are denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Garvey School District v. StudentGarvey School District may reassess a student with autism without parental consent after parents refused and did not appear.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Elk Grove Unified School DistrictElk Grove Unified owed no special education services for 2016-2017 because Parent did not comply with an assessment order.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Sweetwater Union High School District (consolidated)Sweetwater Union High must fund three IEEs after a review-only triennial; assistive technology and transition IEEs denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 5 of 7 issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified may reassess a 17-year-old autistic student without parental consent; its occupational therapy assessment was upheld.District prevailed on all issues
- El Rancho Unified School District v. StudentEl Rancho Unified may not assess a student without parent consent because it did not prove the parent received the plan.Student prevailed on all issues
- Vista Unified School District v. StudentVista Unified may reassess a 10th grader with autism, including a medical assessment, without his mother's consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District v. StudentNorwalk-La Mirada Unified may conduct a student's overdue triennial reassessment without the father's consent, ALJ rules.District prevailed on all issues
- Pasadena Unified School District v. StudentPasadena Unified may not conduct an intensive counseling services assessment without parents' consent; the district's request is denied.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. River Springs Charter School (consolidated)River Springs Charter School must fund The Prentice School tuition, a fall 2016 semester there, and a $5,250 IEE.Split decision: student prevailed on 10 of 11 issues (3 in part)
- Elk Grove Unified School District v. StudentElk Grove Unified may reassess a six-year-old private school student without parent consent under its January 2016 assessment plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Carlsbad Unified School District v. StudentCarlsbad Unified may conduct a 13-year-old's first triennial reassessment without Parents' consent, the ALJ rules.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Manteca Unified School District (consolidated)Manteca Unified must provide 448 hours of tutoring and counseling over defective IEP goals; general education placement claim denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 4 of 26 issues
- San Dieguito Union High School District v. StudentSan Dieguito Union High School District may complete triennial assessments; Student must make herself available within 45 days.District prevailed on all issues
- William S. Hart Union High School District v. StudentWilliam S. Hart Union High School District may conduct an initial special education assessment of a ninth grader without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Vista Unified School District v. StudentVista Unified may proceed with triennial reassessment under its December 2015 plan as modified and signed by the mother at hearing.District prevailed on all issues
- Castro Valley Unified School District v. StudentCastro Valley Unified may reassess a 17-year-old student without parent consent; the parent's conditions on assessment counted as a refusal.District prevailed on all issues
- Buena Park School District v. StudentBuena Park School District loses bid to defend assessments and reassess without consent after failing to provide Romanian-language plans.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Folsom Cordova Unified School District (consolidated)Folsom Cordova Unified must provide 54 tutoring hours for a missing attention goal and English instruction gaps; may assess without consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 23 issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified may reassess a fifth grader with autism over his parent's objection.District prevailed on all issues
- Grossmont Union High School District v. StudentGrossmont Union High School District may reassess a ninth grader without parental consent after the mother repeatedly withheld consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Desert Sands Unified School District v. StudentDesert Sands Unified's 2013 IEP denied FAPE by dropping adapted PE and omitting OT; home instruction and reassessment upheld.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 3 issues
- Monterey Peninsula Unified School District v. StudentMonterey Peninsula Unified may assess a kindergartner for special education without his parents' consent, ALJ rules.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Fresno Unified School District (consolidated)Fresno Unified must fund 55 months of individualized compensatory education through EvoLibri for a 22-year-old denied FAPE for 39 months.Split decision: student prevailed on 11 of 14 issues
- Clovis Unified School District v. StudentClovis Unified may conduct triennial intellectual and adaptive behavior testing of a 12-year-old without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Kern High School District v. StudentKern High School District may conduct a triennial reassessment without parental consent; Mother's residency-based motion to dismiss denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Bonita Unified School District v. StudentBonita Unified may conduct an initial special education assessment of a first grader without his mother's consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Del Mar Union School District v. StudentDel Mar Union School District may not assess a first grader without parental consent; the ALJ found no suspected disability.Student prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Temecula Valley Unified School District (consolidated)Temecula Valley Unified must fund up to 50 counseling hours and an OT assessment; it may assess mental health without consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 13 issues (1 in part)
- Student v. Fresno Unified School District (consolidated)Fresno Unified denied a 22-year-old student a FAPE from October 2010 onward; ALJ orders assessments before deciding compensatory education.Split decision: student prevailed on 12 of 16 issues
- Student v. West Contra Costa Unified School District (consolidated)West Contra Costa Unified wins every issue; parents must allow triennial testing without the mother observing.District prevailed on all issues
- Oakland Unified School District v. StudentOakland Unified may implement its full-time school IEP over a parent's objection, but cannot contact the student's doctors without her consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 2 issues
- Torrance Unified School District v. StudentTorrance Unified may complete a triennial reassessment without parental consent, and parents may not be present in the testing room.District prevailed on all issues
- Fallbrook Union Elementary School District v. StudentFallbrook Union Elementary may conduct an educationally related mental health assessment of a 14-year-old without his mother's consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Anaheim City School District v. StudentAnaheim City School District may assess a fifth grader without parental consent under its March 28, 2013 assessment plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Poway Unified School District (consolidated)Poway Unified may give a fourth grader with autism the KABC-II cognitive test over parent objection; auditory processing claim denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Fresno Unified School District v. StudentFresno Unified may reassess a 21-year-old without consent and implement its IEP; services may end if parents refuse to cooperate with reassessment.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 3 issues (1 in part)
- Lucia Mar Unified School District v. StudentLucia Mar Unified may reassess a student with qualified assessors of its choice despite the parent's objection to familiar staff.District prevailed on all issues
- Santa Clara Unified School District v. StudentSanta Clara Unified's Beacon nonpublic school offer was a FAPE, and the District may reassess the student without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Torrance Unified School District v. StudentTorrance Unified may complete a triennial assessment without parental consent or parents present; FAPE obligation ends if student not presented.District prevailed on all issues
- Cucamonga School District v. StudentCucamonga School District may reassess a third grader with autism without parental consent; the ALJ rejected the parent's Larry P. objection to the tests.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Santa Clara Unified School District (consolidated)Santa Clara Unified's moderate to severe SDC offer upheld as the LRE; district may give a cognitive assessment only.Split decision: student prevailed on 1 of 4 issues (1 in part)
- San Luis Coastal Unified School District v. StudentSan Luis Coastal Unified may give autism test with two school psychologists after parents' objection to one assessor was resolved at hearing.District prevailed on all issues
- Cloverdale Unified School District v. StudentCloverdale Unified may conduct a 12-year-old's triennial reassessment without parental consent after parents did not appear at hearing.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Fullerton School District (consolidated)Fullerton School District must reimburse $6,475 for an independent evaluation after offering reassessment instead of funding or defending.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 3 issues
- Student v. Manteca Unified School District (consolidated)Manteca Unified prevails on all issues; nonverbal ability test did not violate Larry P., and District may assess without consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Santa Cruz City School District et al. (consolidated)Santa Cruz City Schools and County Office must provide 240 compensatory hours for flawed goals and behavior plan; residential placement denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 16 issues (2 in part)
- Student v. Oakland Unified School District (consolidated)Oakland Unified must fund 255 hours of tutoring for unprovided resource services; District may conduct triennial assessment without consent.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 10 issues
- Panama-Buena Vista Union School District v. StudentPanama-Buena Vista Union may assess a preschooler without parental consent under its March 2011 assessment plan; records issue dismissed.District prevailed on all issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified may conduct a triennial assessment of a 16-year-old without parental consent after years of refusals.District prevailed on all issues
- Bakersfield City School District v. StudentBakersfield City School District offered FAPE, including SEAL Center placement, and may reassess the student without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Sequoia Union High School District (consolidated)Sequoia Union High School District must reimburse nonpublic school tuition through 2013 after Student prevailed on every issue.Student prevailed on all issues
- Moreno Valley Unified School District v. StudentMoreno Valley Unified's offer of a functional skills program offered a 21-year-old with autism FAPE; Mother must allow OT assessment.District prevailed on all issues
- Roseville City School District v. StudentRoseville City School District's occupational therapy assessment was appropriate, so the district need not fund an independent evaluation.District prevailed on all issues
- Garvey School District v. StudentGarvey School District may conduct a triennial psychoeducational and speech-language reassessment without parental consent, and without the parent present.District prevailed on all issues
- Tustin Unified School District v. StudentTustin Unified may conduct an 18-year-old's triennial reassessment with its own staff assessors without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Lodi Unified School District v. StudentLodi Unified may assess a student for special education without parental consent, ALJ rules after the district filed for hearing.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District (consolidated)Dry Creek Joint Elementary may reassess a student with dyslexia, and its 2009-2010 IEP offer is upheld; father sanctioned $3,880.District prevailed on all issues
- Corona-Norco Unified School District v. StudentCorona-Norco Unified may implement its October 2008 IEP and conduct physical therapy and assistive technology assessments without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Moreno Valley Unified School District (consolidated)Moreno Valley Unified prevails on all claims; November 2008 IEP upheld and District may obtain a medical assessment.District prevailed on all issues
- Glendale Unified School District v. StudentGlendale Unified may conduct an initial special education assessment of a seventh grader without his parents' consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Lafayette School District v. StudentLafayette School District must pay half of parents' $4,800 IEE after unnecessarily delaying its response, and it may reassess the student.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 4 issues (1 in part)
- Newport-Mesa Unified School District v. StudentNewport-Mesa Unified may reassess an 11-year-old autistic student on home instruction without parental consent, including a health assessment.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Sequoia Union High School District (consolidated)Sequoia Union High must reimburse $12,780 in private tuition for cancelling a 2006 IEP meeting; most other claims denied.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 15 issues
- Chico Unified School District v. StudentChico Unified may reassess a 16-year-old with a learning disability without his father's consent, ALJ rules.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Adelanto Elementary School District (consolidated)Adelanto Elementary owes 210 Lindamood Bell hours and 114 speech therapy hours for missed eligibility; may conduct behavior assessment.Split decision: student prevailed on 5 of 12 issues (1 in part)
- Mt. Diablo Unified School District v. StudentMt. Diablo Unified may reassess a high school student at Children's Health Council without parental consent and must pay family travel costs.District prevailed on all issues
- San Ramon Valley Unified School District v. StudentSan Ramon Valley Unified may conduct a triennial reassessment without parental consent; the parents' request for an IEE at District expense is denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Sequoia Union High School District v. StudentSequoia Union High School District may reassess a high school student without parental consent, using its own qualified staff.District prevailed on all issues
- Lancaster Elementary School District v. StudentLancaster Elementary School District may assess a 12-year-old under its August 2007 plan without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Anaheim Union High School District v. StudentAnaheim Union High cannot reassess a parent-placed private school student without consent; district relieved of FAPE duty meanwhile.Student prevailed on all issues
- Ripon Unified School District v. StudentRipon Unified may complete a triennial reassessment without parental consent or the parents' added testing conditions.District prevailed on all issues
- San Diego Unified School District v. StudentSan Diego Unified may reassess a student with a speech or language impairment and implement his speech IEP without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Manhattan Beach Unified School District v. StudentManhattan Beach Unified may reassess a second grader without parental consent and implement its October 2006 IEP.District prevailed on all issues
- Poway Unified School District v. StudentPoway Unified may not override parents' refusal to consent to a triennial reassessment of their privately placed 19-year-old daughter.Student prevailed on all issues
- Beverly Hills Unified School District v. StudentBeverly Hills Unified may assess a seventh grader without parental consent after the parents ignored three assessment plan mailings.District prevailed on all issues
- Lake Elsinore Unified School District v. StudentLake Elsinore Unified may not assess a home-schooled student without consent; it owes no FAPE while the parent refuses services.Student prevailed on all issues
- Paramount Unified School District v. StudentParamount Unified may reassess a sixth grader with a learning disability without parental consent before considering parents' exit request.District prevailed on all issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified may assess a high school student without parental consent under its 2006 and 2007 assessment plans.District prevailed on all issues
- Poway Unified School District v. StudentPoway Unified may assess a 10th grader without signed parental consent after the mother failed to respond to its assessment plan.District prevailed on all issues
- San Diego Unified School District v. StudentSan Diego Unified may place a 15-year-old at Riley School and refer him for a mental health assessment without parent consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. StudentLos Angeles Unified may assess an 11th grader without parent consent under its February 2007 assessment plan.District prevailed on all issues
- Irvine Unified School District v. StudentIrvine Unified may reassess an adult autistic student under his consented plan; Student must be made reasonably available for testing.District prevailed on all issues
- Oxnard Elementary School District v. StudentOxnard Elementary School District may assess a seventh grader without parental consent; parent's request for an IEE is premature.District prevailed on all issues
- Poway Unified School District v. StudentPoway Unified may conduct an early triennial reassessment of an adult student without consent; the student did not appear at hearing.District prevailed on all issues
- Panama-Buena Vista Union School District v. StudentPanama-Buena Vista Union may reassess a 13-year-old whose parents signed the plan but never brought him to testing.District prevailed on all issues
- Orange Unified School District v. StudentOrange Unified may reassess a 12-year-old after a conflicting private evaluation; the district's request for sanctions against the parents was denied.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. San Diego Unified School District (consolidated)San Diego Unified must reimburse $66,920 for a Utah residential school after missing emotional disturbance; District may reassess the student.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 3 issues
- Sylvan Union School District v. StudentSylvan Union may reassess a student with autism under its April 2006 plan, but its IEPs did not offer FAPE.Split decision: student prevailed on 3 of 4 issues
- Berkeley Unified School District v. StudentBerkeley Unified may reassess a 16-year-old for special education eligibility without the guardian's consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Sylvan Union School District v. StudentSylvan Union may place a kindergartner with autism in a special day class and reassess OT, but not AT or APE.Split decision: student prevailed on 2 of 9 issues
- Temecula Valley Unified School District v. StudentTemecula Valley Unified may conduct a triennial reassessment of a student with autism without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Manteca Unified School District v. StudentManteca Unified may complete a triennial speech and health reassessment without parental consent after the parents refused to sign.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Corona-Norco Unified School District (consolidated)Corona-Norco Unified prevails on all issues; parents' refusal to allow reassessment ended Student's FAPE entitlement from June 2005.District prevailed on all issues
- Poway Unified School District v. StudentPoway Unified may refer a student with autism for a county mental health assessment without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Chula Vista Elementary School District v. StudentChula Vista Elementary may reassess a kindergarten-age student under a signed plan after the parent never made her available.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Los Angeles Unified School District (consolidated)Los Angeles Unified wins: parents cannot exit their son from special education, and the District may reassess him.District prevailed on all issues
- Irvine Unified School District v. StudentIrvine Unified may assess a medically fragile high school student over parent objection, starting with an assessment by a qualified doctor.District prevailed on all issues
- Manteca Unified School District v. StudentManteca Unified may reassess a 13-year-old with dyslexia without parental consent after his parents withdrew him from school.District prevailed on all issues
- Carlsbad Unified School District v. StudentCarlsbad Unified may obtain a County Mental Health evaluation, including interviews, without the parent's consent.District prevailed on all issues
- San Ramon Valley Unified School District v. StudentSan Ramon Valley Unified's 2005 ESY and 2005-2006 offers provided FAPE; district may assess without parental consent.District prevailed on all issues
- Student v. Huntington Beach Union High School District (consolidated)Huntington Beach Union High may assess student without parent consent; all ten of the student's FAPE claims denied.District prevailed on all issues